He has had good game but probably most of it was upto him playing alongside Kabak. But I see why Klopp did not trust him so much when Hendo was available. On one or two occasions, it was so easy for SU players to go past him. That does not look good when you are playing for EPL champion. But apart from that Klopp needs to trust him more and give him that chance to develop.
When VanDjik is back, I would say give Nat enough starts alongside so that he can develop because Gomez is simply not reliable in terms of injuries.
Some of you lot baffle me... Have you been watching him this season?!? He's done everything asked of him, and then some.
Yes, he's our 4th, maybe even 5th choice CB, and thus, not of an elite standard. Quickly... Name me city's 4th choice CB? Or salford's? And what how close to ousting the starters are those household names.
When we get down as low as any team's 4th or 5th choice, how many are 'good enough'? You know who else wasn't good enough, but now, as usual, because he's not here anymore, he's become Bobby f@#$ing Moore..? Dejan Lovren. And I'd have this lad over him as 4th choice any day.
I love him, gives everything. We wouldn't win the league with him at CB every week but having him on the pitch for the last 10 mins of every game would be great, he doesn't get bullied, wins nearly everything in the air and gives his all. Great example to all the kids who moan about not getting first team football at 12 yrs old.
Sign him up if he wants to stay. If he doesn't, his CV has been enhanced massively with every game he's played this season. I wonder if he's got a youtube video yet?
Just watched it back.. Thaigo let him go.. you could argue that Phillip's should pick him up, but was lazy by Thaigo to just point and assume.Nat Baresi lost McBurnie for their big chance, so both center backs got lucky.
Just watched it back.. Thaigo let him go.. you could argue that Phillip's should pick him up, but was lazy by Thaigo to just point and assume.
Nat Baresi lost McBurnie for their big chance, so both center backs got lucky.
Joe Gomez has lost quite a few half raters in his time too.
Do people really think he's better than Lovren or is this another one of those Sterling/Ibe things?
I'm not gonna slag him off hes been put in a ridiculously difficult position, much like Kabak, but I don't believe he has a future at the club for numerous reasons.
Jesus Christ. Are we really comparing a player nobody wanted a year ago and will be a free agent with a player who’s commanded millions and millions in fees, plsyed in CL league winning teams, league winning teams and WC finalist.I'll bite...
On his best day, yes, Lovern is a much better player than Nat. of course that's fair. But, Lovren had far fewer of his best days with us than people seem to be remembering recently, and on his worst day, he was an utter liability. Nat's a decent player, most games... A solid 6 or 7, most games. 2 times in 10, Lovern would be an 8. Half the time, or more, he'd be a 5 or less.
Lovren was terrifying, most games. Nat's not. He's just a bit scary sometimes.
Jesus Christ. Are we really comparing a player nobody wanted a year ago and will be a free agent with a player who’s commanded millions and millions in fees, plsyed in CL league winning teams, league winning teams and WC finalist.
I’m not a lover of Lovern but fuck me he would have been a much better option this season than Nat.
The fact that you're disagreeing with me makes me feel even better about my post... Djimi fucking Traore won a European Cup.
I think Klopp has made it very clear that Nat is at best a 7th choice CB at this club behind Kabak. I am not saying he would not improve but if we are still relying on him heavily by next season for whatever reason, we will likely not challenge again.
Instead of Nat, we need to sort out our first team CBs. Surely one of Matip or Gomez has to go, we simply cannot rely on them. We need to bring in one, or even two new first team CBs with little to no injury problems.
Fair point, this may be an unpopular opinion but I don't think Gomez has progressed. Hes still relatively young for a senior CB but he's still got big weak spots in his game thats haven't really gone away, he still looks a little bit lost when big bro isn't playing alongside him.
He did. Did he win the league? Was integral to getting to a WC final?
It’s just a laughable position but I’ll leave you to it.
Nat Phillips a better option than Lovern. Fucking LOL.
I think Dreamy is not wrong - objectively Lovren is a better defender than Phillips - quicker, more agile, more tactically flexible. If you’re Croatia or Zenit St. Petersburg and you can choose to build your defense around Lovren or Phillips, it’s obvious who they would choose.
But if you’re Liverpool and need a 4th choose CB to come in in an odd game and not do something incredibly stupid and not take 2-4 games to “shake off the rust” then I think it’s better to have someone like Phillips - maybe less talented, but more reliable.
He did. Did he win the league? Was integral to getting to a WC final?
It’s just a laughable position but I’ll leave you to it.
Nat Phillips a better option than Lovern. Fucking LOL.
Lovren would be injured for 3-4 months after winning this header..