• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Luis Suarez pwned by the Lizards and is Staying, and has said sorry to BR and teammates

"@FootballLaw: PFA: Suarez clause. If LFC dont qualify for CL & receive a £40m offer, then the parties will 'agree to discuss & negotiate in good faith'."
 
"@FootballLaw: PFA: Suarez clause. If LFC dont qualify for CL & receive a £40m offer, then the parties will 'agree to discuss & negotiate in good faith'."
Well, that should make it all clear.

On the other side, none has shown good faith so far....
 
"@FootballLaw: PFA: Suarez clause. If LFC dont qualify for CL & receive a £40m offer, then the parties will 'agree to discuss & negotiate in good faith'."

The clause was leaked to the press in bad faith. He will have to persuade the court that it was a lapse following which he had nothing but good faith. Then he will need to persuade the court that the meetings he had with Ayre, Gerrard and Rodgers were to discuss the weather and nothing to do with his transfer.
 
The clause was leaked to the press in bad faith. He will have to persuade the court that it was a lapse following which he had nothing but good faith. Then he will need to persuade the court that the meetings he had with Ayre, Gerrard and Rodgers were to discuss the weather and nothing to do with his transfer.
But rejecting it blatantly is not negotiating in good faith either? We are right to decline the sum, but refusing to sell at any price and make funny comments about it on twitter is not negotiating in good faith no matter how cool it is?
 
In my case the contract stipulated a salary which the uni refused to honour, and is proven by emails, payslips and bank statements. Even then I'm not taken contract law for granted.

Suarez is just, he lacks intelligence. Even in the way he plays its skillfull and effective, but its not anywhere near as intelligent as Coutinho. We could replace him with a clever player and become a better team.
 
But rejecting it blatantly is not negotiating in good faith either? We are right to decline the sum, but refusing to sell at any price and make funny comments about it on twitter is not negotiating in good faith no matter how cool it is?

£40,000,001. How can you take that in good faith? The other party has obviously tried to fuck you over
 
£40,000,001. How can you take that in good faith? The other party has obviously tried to fuck you over
We can hardly prove that the intention was to fuck us over. The intention was to test the clause and bring us to negotiating? Which we so far haven't done, we just rejected it?

So we haven't honoured the contract as I see it. We should have handler it different... To negotiate that the 3 years remaining of the contract and a Bale fee of 85 m would put Luis in a price bracket of 65-70 m. Given they are direct competitor for 4 th place adds on 5-10 m. Your move. That would either make them raise the cash bid or move out of the deal. Not the shit we see now.
 
Its about time that BR put the hammer down and banished him for now. When his leadership and integrity is publicly called into question, he should act decisively and let Suarez know whose BOSS!

Well done Gaffer 🙂
 
*TWITTER ALERT*

Some people reckon we're gonna hit him with a record fine for bringing the club into disrepute.
 
Suarez has had to eat his words about not wanting to be in England. I'd love to see how he can justify that he had acted in good faith himself.
 
Do Arsenal fans really believe it'd be money well spent, 40 or 50m? Are they really lacking just that one striker to challenge for the title?
 
We can hardly prove that the intention was to fuck us over. The intention was to test the clause and bring us to negotiating? Which we so far haven't done, we just rejected it?

So we haven't honoured the contract as I see it. We should have handler it different... To negotiate that the 3 years remaining of the contract and a Bale fee of 85 m would put Luis in a price bracket of 65-70 m. Given they are direct competitor for 4 th place adds on 5-10 m. Your move. That would either make them raise the cash bid or move out of the deal. Not the shit we see now.



The point is Liverpool and Suarez agreed to negotiate in good faith if a bid of 40 million came in. If Suarez then discloses that clause to the press or Arsenal, he's not acting in good faith anymore. He is using his knowledge of the clause to engineer a way out. That's the very opposite of good faith. So Suarez through his own actions has made that term in his contract unenforceable.
 
Do Arsenal fans really believe it'd be money well spent, 40 or 50m? Are they really lacking just that one striker to challenge for the title?
You forget that they see qualifying for CL as success... Not titles. Hence removing him from our team strengthen their chances of success!!
 
The point is Liverpool and Suarez agreed to negotiate in good faith if a bid of 40 million came in. If Suarez then discloses that clause to the press or Arsenal, he's not acting in good faith anymore. He is using his knowledge of the clause to engineer a way out. That's the very opposite of good faith. So Suarez through his own actions has made that term in his contract unenforceable.
His actions doesn't excuse our actions? It is still wrong of any Liverpool player to bite an opposition even if Luis allready did.
 
Liverpool will rightly say that if Arsenal didn't know about his clause, they would have bid closer to his market value of 50 million. That clause is may as well have been written on toilet paper as Liverpool are under no obligation to even negotiate about any offer now.
 
Liverpool will rightly say that if Arsenal didn't know about his clause, they would have bid closer to his market value of 50 million. That clause is may as well have been written on toilet paper as Liverpool are under no obligation to even negotiate about any offer now.
And how the hell were they not to know about it? There are Polar bears in the fucking arctic knowing about the clause. And if they didn't know the exact content they still triggered it? Why do we know about Costas clause?
 
We only entered into that clause on the assumption it would remain confidential. Now that it has been publicized that is a breach of good faith. Suarez has put the club into a position where good faith is impossible.

It's not some choice on the clubs part. They cannot possible honour that clause now unless they all get hit on the head and suffer memory loss.
 
Back
Top Bottom