• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Liverpool's new Stanley Park stadium on hold until recession is over

Status
Not open for further replies.

the count

SCM's least favourite muppet- There was a poll
Honorary Member
Doubt if anyone seen this one coming


Liverpool's new stadium will not be built until the global recession is over and credit becomes available to finance the $800 million project.

By Telegraph staff and agencies
Published: 5:43PM BST 03 Sep 2009

The 60,000-seat replacement for Liverpool's historic but crumbling Anfield was due to have opened next year, but the economic downturn forced co-owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett Jr. to halt building work last August.

The American owners had said it would be a "short-term delay," but they are still not able to put a date on building work resuming.


"Construction on the stadium will begin when the current contraction in the banking industry ends and the global financial markets re-establish their equilibrium," Liverpool's new managing director Christian Purslow said.

Purslow hopes the stadium on the adjacent Stanley Park will be ready in time for 2018 to stage World Cup matches should England's bid to stage the showcase event prove successful.

"The centerpiece is to deliver a world-class football ground that everyone can be proud of, a new home for the club with a stadium of at least 60,000 seats, giving the best possible match experience," Purslow said.

Liverpool has been financially hamstrung by the economics of 45,000-capacity Anfield, where there are just 34 luxury suites and few amenities to generate extra funding to enhance the squad.

Manchester United's Old Trafford can welcome 76,000 fans and Arsenal moved from 38,000-seat Highbury into 60,000-seat Emirates Stadium in July 2006.

Liverpool vice-captain Jamie Carragher has said he is embarrassed and irritated by the delays in replacing the stadium.

Millions of pounds were written-off when existing plans to replace Anfield were ditched after Liverpool was bought by the Hicks and Gillett in 2007 so architects from Hicks' native Texas could design a more spectacular stadium.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/liverpool/6133965/Liverpools-new-Stanley-Park-stadium-on-hold-until-recession-is-over.html
 
[quote author=keniget link=topic=35632.msg938208#msg938208 date=1252003631]
2018?

Unbelievable.
[/quote]

He hopes Keni, no guarantees
 
So just the 20 years after the original plans were drawn up then.
You have to hand it to us.......were fucking shit.
 
If we wait until then to build the stadium, we will have lost significantly more money than the cost of the stadium, in gate receipts.

Horrible.
 
On the bright side by then we will have paid for the loans the americans took out to buy us.

2018 .... unbridled ambition.

You never know .... maybe that shareliverpool action isnt such a bad idea after all..


2000 and fucking 18!!
 
So, Manure, who currently take reportedly £1m more than us for every home matchday, will have made an extra £171 million over the next 9 years over us...IF they don't increase their attendance (which they fucking will). Fucking great. You Yank fucking cocks.

How come (and I bet Pompey are also asking how they get the only Sheik businessman without money) we get the only two reportedly excellent American businessmen who (a) won't speculate to accumulate, (b) have no sporting knowledge, (c) hate each other and (d) don't pay their bills. Fucking hell, this is getting worse with every day.

Didn't Carra say he wanted his testimonial to be at the new Anfield? With these cumsocks running the ship he'll be lucky if his son James has his testimonial there.

As for the 'work was stopped building the ground' back in August 2008, fuck off. You never fucking started. They never will, and we won't have planning permission for Stanley Park in a few years time.
 
469_jaw_dropping.gif
 
Two observations, he only said he hoped it would be ready for the World Cup in 2018, he might also hope it is ready for 2013.
Secondly the article to say that the current stadium is "crumbling" is pretty far off the mark.

regards
 
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=35632.msg938427#msg938427 date=1252047461]
Two observations, he only said he hoped it would be ready for the World Cup in 2018, he might also hope it is ready for 2013.
Secondly the article to say that the current stadium is "crumbling" is pretty far off the mark.

regards
[/quote]

Esp considering Goodison is held together only by some gaffer tape & sheer force of will.
 
[quote author=FoxForceFive link=topic=35632.msg938435#msg938435 date=1252048241]
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=35632.msg938427#msg938427 date=1252047461]
Two observations, he only said he hoped it would be ready for the World Cup in 2018, he might also hope it is ready for 2013.
Secondly the article to say that the current stadium is "crumbling" is pretty far off the mark.

regards
[/quote]

Esp considering Goodison is held together only by some gaffer tape & sheer force of will.
[/quote]

Shouldn't that be 'the people's gaffa tape' ?
 
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=35632.msg938427#msg938427 date=1252047461]
Two observations, he only said he hoped it would be ready for the World Cup in 2018, he might also hope it is ready for 2013.
Secondly the article to say that the current stadium is "crumbling" is pretty far off the mark.

regards
[/quote]

He 'might' also be 'hoping' it's ready for 2018 but think it 'might' be more 'realistic' that it's finished for the 2022 world cup? 😱

All in all - forget about a new stadium under the yanks. I would gobsmacked if a ground is built under their ownership. They'll be long gone by 2018 the chancers.
 
It's time like this I question whether we've being overly fussy about holding onto a new Anfield and not practical enough. Given the ridiculous nature of our future stadium build, if we were any other club I wouldn't be directly opposed to a ground-share with a rival, but Anfield has a special significance, to the club and the millions of fans who pass through the turnstiles, we should never, ever consider the position of a ground-share with Everton. And our clubs unwavering position makes me feel proud.

It may take longer than necessary to build our stadium, our new home, but it will be ours, and it will be special, and it will be so forever. And we'll could fill it full of 80,000 week in week out given the chance.
 
what's the hysteria for - 2018 isn't a target date, it was just mentioned for its significance given our world cup bid.

the stadium makes financial sense, therefore it'll be built when we can afford to build it. if the americans can't afford it, they'll sell - they're not deliberately torturing us.
 
[quote author=peterhague link=topic=35632.msg938641#msg938641 date=1252062570]
what's the hysteria for - 2018 isn't a target date, it was just mentioned for its significance given our world cup bid.

the stadium makes financial sense, therefore it'll be built when we can afford to build it. if the americans can't afford it, they'll sell - they're not deliberately torturing us.[/quote]

Well... as long as its not deliberate eh!
 
[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=35632.msg938220#msg938220 date=1252004861]
So just the 20 years after the original plans were drawn up then.
You have to hand it to us.......were fucking shit.
[/quote]

Got to disagree a little because all major engineering projects are on the books for 10years plus!!!

Oh and answer my PM dammit!!!
 
Liverpool co-owner Tom Hicks has vowed that the club will build a new stadium – but has said that the move will not be financed by the £450million he is set to bank from the sale of baseball club Texas Rangers.

Hicks and business partner George Gillett have been unable to raise the £500m it will cost to fund the development of a 60,000-capacity home for the Reds at Stanley Park because of the credit crunch.

There have been reports in the United States that Hicks has now entered into negotiations with six potential buyers for the Rangers – and that Liverpool will benefit from the windfall.

But Hicks said: “Rangers and Liverpool are totally separate investments, so there is no connection.

“I do plan to keep a significant participation in the Rangers. We are close to winning our division. I want to finish what we have started.

“Liverpool will obtain stadium financing when the financial market opens back up. We have all of our permits and will be ready when the market is ready.â€

Liverpool’s new managing director Christian Purslow admitted last week that the club hope to have the stadium completed in time for 2018 – should England’s World Cup bid be successful.

That is six years behind the original schedule set when Hicks and Gillett bought Liverpool three years ago.

The American pair have been criticised for failing to provide the finance for the stadium and for manager Rafa Benitez to build a championship-winning team.

But Purslow’s portfolio is to develop new commercial streams – and he is in talks with several interested companies about a £15m-a-year kit sponsorship deal.

Hicks added: “Christian Purslow is working hard. Liverpool’s new management focus is producing great new commercial results that will become known in due time.â€


http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Liverpool-WILL-build-a-new-stadium-promises-Tom-Hicks-article146423.html
 
“Rangers and Liverpool are totally separate investments, so there is no connection."

Erm, apart from you. You cunt.
 
if he isn't going to use any money from the rangers sale for liverpool then who gives a shit whether he sells the rangers or not.
 
I never thought Hicks selling the Rangers would be source of funding for our stadium.

I'm a little bit more optimistic now he'll have some more capital. Not saying he'll spend it on us but at least it's there if required.
 
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=35632.msg939263#msg939263 date=1252235779]
I never thought Hicks selling the Rangers would be source of funding for our stadium.

I'm a little bit more optimistic now he'll have some more capital. Not saying he'll spend it on us but at least it's there if required.
[/quote]

That was my thinking, I thought he'd use a small percentage to stump enough capital top build the fucking thing. Obviously not.
 
[quote author=the count link=topic=35632.msg939257#msg939257 date=1252233292]
Liverpool co-owner Tom Hicks has vowed that the club will build a new stadium – but has said that the move will not be financed by the £450million he is set to bank from the sale of baseball club Texas Rangers.Hicks and business partner George Gillett have been unable to raise the £500m it will cost to fund the development of a 60,000-capacity home for the Reds at Stanley Park because of the credit crunch.

There have been reports in the United States that Hicks has now entered into negotiations with six potential buyers for the Rangers – and that Liverpool will benefit from the windfall.

But Hicks said: “Rangers and Liverpool are totally separate investments, so there is no connection.

“I do plan to keep a significant participation in the Rangers. We are close to winning our division. I want to finish what we have started.

“Liverpool will obtain stadium financing when the financial market opens back up. We have all of our permits and will be ready when the market is ready.â€

Liverpool’s new managing director Christian Purslow admitted last week that the club hope to have the stadium completed in time for 2018 – should England’s World Cup bid be successful.

That is six years behind the original schedule set when Hicks and Gillett bought Liverpool three years ago.

The American pair have been criticised for failing to provide the finance for the stadium and for manager Rafa Benitez to build a championship-winning team.

But Purslow’s portfolio is to develop new commercial streams – and he is in talks with several interested companies about a £15m-a-year kit sponsorship deal.

Hicks added: “Christian Purslow is working hard. Liverpool’s new management focus is producing great new commercial results that will become known in due time.â€


http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Liverpool-WILL-build-a-new-stadium-promises-Tom-Hicks-article146423.html

[/quote]

Like we didnt know that already you poxy fucking cunt, why doesn't he just shut the fuck up? Does he honestly believe that somewhere around there is some delusional twat still believing that this was going to happen despite all of the lies and all of the bullshit and greed.

They have absolutely no credibilty left. None. If they did have a shred of credibilty left it would have been borrowed from some idiot.

2018... HOPEFULLY!!!...what we hope or you hope you fucking mug??.....but we wont pay for it!!!..... just what are they fucking like.

I bet hes got a sub prime mortgage on that mansion i just bet you he does
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35632.msg939371#msg939371 date=1252262626]
I bet the club is paying for the mansion
[/quote]

Indeed! Maybe so Ross. i read the full transcript of the Ken bates slander trial in july in his testimony he basically claimed that although rich he doesnt have a pot to piss in and was therefore disputing the damages awarded as he would be unable to pay, he can borrow 3,4 million quid but he cant actually give you any cash.

I find it a strange form of business, not actually to own anything, not producing anything for a profit or having a great idea etc but just being able to borrow to buy and then do it again and again, leveraged they say.... fucking shyster is what i say.

We are literally giving that fella our money for NOTHING.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom