• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Keep Suarez?

Sell?

  • YES

    Votes: 19 12.3%
  • NO

    Votes: 135 87.7%

  • Total voters
    154
Take a look at yourself.

I ask you to show me the power under which the FA could have punished Defoe. You copy and paste the rule that allows them to reduce the automatic 3 match ban for a sending off to something less. And you say I can interpret everything the way I want, it's what they do.

Totally fucking childish. If you can't accept being pulled up for being totally fucking wrong and totally idiotic that's on you.

Like others I get totally fed up with the default "everybody's out to get us" , woe is me sorry for ourselves bullshit that gets pulled every single time. Man the fuck up you big pussy

I gave you an example of a situation where the FA charges a player in the exact same situation that Defoe was in and you dismiss saying the FA only did it because they knew he wouldn't appeal. You're clutching at straws, you know damn well if they wanted to charge him they could have done.
 
Suarez deserves heavy punishment. Agreed.

So why the fuck are morons going on about Defoe, if Suarez does deserve heavy punishment ?You can't on the one hand agree he needs to be punished and on the other ask that he be treated the same as someone who got away with it.

Unless you're a massive hypocrite.

I love the way Piedro has been totally ignored by the Scouse contingent btw

Because they want consistency and fairness which isn't that hard to understand, is it?

Defoe's punishment was too lenient and Suarez's was too harsh, no?
 
This thread is fucking boss. Between this one and the Thatcher dead thread, this place has come alive again in recent weeks.

Excellent work Jebus
 
Take a look at yourself.

I ask you to show me the power under which the FA could have punished Defoe. You copy and paste the rule that allows them to reduce the automatic 3 match ban for a sending off to something less. And you say I can interpret everything the way I want, it's what they do.

Totally fucking childish. If you can't accept being pulled up for being totally fucking wrong and totally idiotic that's on you.

Like others I get totally fed up with the default "everybody's out to get us" , woe is me sorry for ourselves bullshit that gets pulled every single time. Man the fuck up you big pussy


It's not even what you say you gibbering bellend it's the way you say it. You seem unable to get your point across without inferring those who disagree are either stupid or lack some form of mental capacity. Thats your issue. You've become socially retarded. And you fucking know it. That's why you felt the need to apologise to me "for acting like a dick" last time I saw you in the alehouse - you sad fuck. Now jog on.
 
WardrobeMalfunction.png


Time for a group hug!
 
Oliver Holt@OllieHolt221h
Why is David Cameron worrying about Luis Suarez being a role model for his son? He should be the role model for his son.
 
Ryan and Ross, the moral beacons, shining their righteousness through the murky masses of Neanderthal Liverpool supporters, noses lifted, chins raised. Continually ignoring the fact that almost everyone has said Suarez has acted like a tit, is not right in the head, have condemned his actions and deserved a ban. Yes you are a different kind of football supporter. One that doesn't get the idea you've been shafted and are happy to bend over the table and get a right royal humping. Go on, squeal like a pig boy.

I'm not sure what to say to that really. It's quite pitiful to be honest.

Much like your recent departure from the forum in a huff, only to retutn a short while later under a bizarre pseudonym. Which you couldn't even do very well, as you we're found out within a day.

You're a bit strange.
 
Everyone agrees that it should be more than the standard ban of 3 matches.

So, the question is how much more. If you forget every other offence he has committed and he recieved a 4/5 match ban you would go fair enough. So if you take into consideration his previous then the logical outcome is a 7/8 match ban. You could also say that as long as he goes to some thought of therapy it is a 5 match ban with 2/3 suspended.

I also think we as a club should have banned him for the remainder of the season to send a message to both the player nad the FA that we took it seriously.
 
I'm not sure what to say to that really. It's quite pitiful to be honest.

Much like your recent departure from the forum in a huff, only to retutn a short while later under a bizarre pseudonym. Which you couldn't even do very well, as you we're found out within a day.

You're a bit strange.

Is that it? The best you can do?
 
Everyone agrees that it should be more than the standard ban of 3 matches.

So, the question is how much more. If you forget every other offence he has committed and he recieved a 4/5 match ban you would go fair enough. So if you take into consideration his previous then the logical outcome is a 7/8 match ban. You could also say that as long as he goes to some thought of therapy it is a 5 match ban with 2/3 suspended.

I also think we as a club should have banned him for the remainder of the season to send a message to both the player nad the FA that we took it seriously.

Well one thing that hasn't really been acknowledged is that the FA said in their statement that they couldn't consider his ban for Ajax as it was in a different country. So effectively this has been based on last years ban.
 
Is that it? The best you can do?

Best I can do at what? You're the one who's been goading me relentlessly throughout this and other threads.

I'm not really that bothered about sparring with you. I don't really think that much of you to be bothered, mostly cos I think you're a bit weird.
 
It's not even what you say you gibbering bellend it's the way you say it. You seem unable to get your point across without inferring those who disagree are either stupid or lack some form of mental capacity. Thats your issue. You've become socially retarded. And you fucking know it. That's why you felt the need to apologise to me "for acting like a dick" last time I saw you in the alehouse - you sad fuck. Now jog on.

I couldn't care less if Ross and I happen to share the same view on this thing (we disagree on just about every other football matter), but the above is ridiculous and taking things too far.

Call me whatever you like.
 
I couldn't care less if Ross and I happen to share the same view on this thing (we disagree on just about every other football matter), but the above is ridiculous and taking things too far.

Call me whatever you like.

Or stay out of it
 
Well one thing that hasn't really been acknowledged is that the FA said in their statement that they couldn't consider his ban for Ajax as it was in a different country. So effectively this has been based on last years ban.

This is where I know they are full of shite, as sub conciously they will be thinking of it hence why it is longer that most reasonable people thought he would get.
 
I've no idea, why don't you ask him?

I can see the correlation you've made though. In that I post something comprehensible, intelligent and valid, and you - like dreamy - dont have the nous to respond to it accordingly.

Or you leave and come back under a different name. For no reason.

Oh actually, not even dreamy did that. Just you. And nikeser did that too actually, so you're in good company.
 
Back
Top Bottom