Bloody iPad, *well*
Keep Suarez?
- Thread starter LeTallecWiz
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
I know, I'm in a methodical mood.
Liverpool forward Luis Suarez charged with violent conduct
The FA has charged Liverpool forward Luis Suarez with violent conduct.
The charge follows an incident with Chelsea’s Branislav Ivanovic in yesterday’s fixture at Anfield [21 April 2013].
The incident was not seen by the match officials and has therefore been retrospectively reviewed – click here for a video explanation of ‘not seen incidents’.
It is alleged that the conduct of Suarez constitutes violent conduct and it is The FA’s contention that the standard punishment of three matches that would otherwise apply is clearly insufficient in these circumstances.
Suarez has until 6pm on Tuesday 23 April to respond to the charge, thereafter an Independent Regulatory Commission will be convened this Wednesday, 24 April.
Click here for full details of The FA's Disciplinary Procedures.
The FA has charged Liverpool forward Luis Suarez with violent conduct.
The charge follows an incident with Chelsea’s Branislav Ivanovic in yesterday’s fixture at Anfield [21 April 2013].
The incident was not seen by the match officials and has therefore been retrospectively reviewed – click here for a video explanation of ‘not seen incidents’.
It is alleged that the conduct of Suarez constitutes violent conduct and it is The FA’s contention that the standard punishment of three matches that would otherwise apply is clearly insufficient in these circumstances.
Suarez has until 6pm on Tuesday 23 April to respond to the charge, thereafter an Independent Regulatory Commission will be convened this Wednesday, 24 April.
Click here for full details of The FA's Disciplinary Procedures.
I fucking hate Methodists.
You lot are cunts.
'Clearly'
Fucking dicks.
Lol remember that time Wayne Rooney booted a footballer in the back and the FA wrote to Fifa to get hos THREE game ban reduced. Lolz.
The metro is true to form, usually not even a paragraph for Liverpool, this has a double page spread as well as the back page and and another column. The main article accuses football of degenerating into tribalism, yet later on the article says it would be wonderful if we got rid of Suarez and no one else signs here, basically kick him out of football, remarkable.
Barclay is a grade a fucking cunt though.
I do reckon they'll do a ridiculous number like 10 games though, cos it's suarez.
Course they will, and he'll probably leave or we'll push him and idiots who think that this is the reason we've lost our identity (people who have proven over time they haven't a fucking clue what our identity is or was) will rejoice in us being right and proper, while moaning about how shit Stewart Downing is or some other Mr Average. But heh, we'll have given ourselves a token ounce of self respect back and we can all sit here then while United intimidate and control the football authorities being the epitome of "the right way", but that will be ok because after all, innocent Fergie's a "brilliant manager" and United are the bestest club ever. Blah blah usual hyper bollocks by clueless bellends who haven't a fucking clue what the club is about other than what they've read in a book once about the Liverpool Way.
They can royally get fucked.
Isn't the main difference that in Defoe's case the ref spotted and dealt with it whereas in Suarez's case the ref didn't?
BBC Sporf @BBCSporf 19m BREAKING: Liverpool confirm they have received an undisclosed bid for Luis Suarez, from German side Borussia Munchonacentreback.
Sad but so very true.
Or in direct proportion to the size of his teeth.
I think it clearly means he loves the club
In that case it's a yellow card.
The FA making the rules up as they go. What a surprise.
If the ref didn't give Defoe a yellow card the FA also would have had the chance to ban him.
So I don't quite understand what this has to do with the club.
