Journalist apparently.
Keep Suarez?
- Thread starter LeTallecWiz
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Not small change even to a footy player.
They're clearly trying to get in front of the fa discipline panel, it's a good thing, Tbf, despite the stick Ayre gets (from me too) the club have handled this well.
They're clearly trying to get in front of the fa discipline panel, it's a good thing, Tbf, despite the stick Ayre gets (from me too) the club have handled this well.
I thought they were only legally allowed to fine him 2 weeks wages?
I assume if the player agrees it wouldn't be an issue.
Really? That's incredible. It's a terribly written article.
Defoe got a yellow card for biting, and that was the last that was said of it. Suarez looked like he attempted to bite Ivanovic, not leaving a mark, so I'm not sure if he actually got a bite on him, so I'm not sure on what grounds the FA would have to ban him considering the precedent set with Defoe.
I think a fair punishment is maybe some sort of community order from the FA, and that we as a club ban him ourselves from playing until next season. We've fuck all to play for anyways.
Biting is obviously wrong, but there's players going in studs up and two footed every week, that could actually end another players career, and that gets a 3game ban? And don't forget kicking a ball at a player can 'kill a man'....
I think a fair punishment is maybe some sort of community order from the FA, and that we as a club ban him ourselves from playing until next season. We've fuck all to play for anyways.
Biting is obviously wrong, but there's players going in studs up and two footed every week, that could actually end another players career, and that gets a 3game ban? And don't forget kicking a ball at a player can 'kill a man'....
Apart from that time in the World Cup, has Suarez actually been sent off many times? Or at all, even?
You'd think that, given everyone knows that he is a mentalist, he would be watched like a hawk and not get away with anything on the field, yet he always seems to get in trouble afterwards
You'd think that, given everyone knows that he is a mentalist, he would be watched like a hawk and not get away with anything on the field, yet he always seems to get in trouble afterwards
I'm gobsmacked by the people who want a 7-10 match ban. Its insane.
Try this from Chris Bascombe in The Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...ncidents-like-bite-on-Branislav-Ivanovic.html
I'm sure its going to happen though. After the Evra punishment, and the Ajax ban, we know Luis won't get a hand-slapping. Personally, I disagree with comparing this to a bad tackle. That happens in the game - this shouldn't.
No way I'd sell though - especially when teams use this as a reasoning for only offering 40m. Luis is our most exciting player in a generation. Anfield would be a drabber place without him.
What about kicking someone on the ground in the head?
Yeah, but Bascombe is about as bad as it gets.
That was accidental apparently
Nope, it was a cultural thing
But where any of them sold on the back of those incidents? Were they fuck?
I've no problem with the media being all over it. But trying to force us to get rid is fucking appalling.
Not to side-track this too much, but I thought it was a little odd. I mean, given who did it, it's unlikely he meant it, but he still kicked a guy in the head. I would think he should have been banned.
The Alan Shearer defence.
Oh look at us the press how we're always right and just. Fuck off Bascombe you bellend. He has had a bee in his bonnet against us ever since he left The Liverpool Echo and went to work for the News of the World. He quickly lost his connections in the club and got a tit on about it.
Sheila Coleman @SheilaColeman96 Suarez to make donation to Hillsborough families! Ian Ayre/LFC disgraceful to use Hillsborough in this way.#exploitation.
Seems a bit mad that. The money was going to go to charity anyway (don't all premiership fines?), so why not send it to a good one?
Yeah, there's it was to help his pr, but regardless, it's 300k luv, that pays for a shitload of legal advice to dissect the forthcoming information & challenge any lies or undisclosed material.
Probably pissed off at the nature of how the fine came about but if Suarez is being truly contrite here I think using the word "exploitation" is a bit over the top.
Did Ayre/LFC force him to choose Hillsborough or did Suarez request it ? This all seems a bit of a weird reaction to me.
