[quote author=Richey link=topic=39427.msg1074945#msg1074945 date=1269260743]
[quote author=the_khl link=topic=39427.msg1074941#msg1074941 date=1269260501]
Ranieri which I reckon is one of the worst top-managers outthere came close enough. And even so withouth the likes of Drogba, Robben, Carvalho, Cech, Cole, Ballack, Mikel and Essien.
Of course he would've won it too had he got the same material to work with.
[/quote]
He had all the money Mourinho had and spent a fucking shit load. What you are essentially saying is that Ranieri wasn't as good in the transfer market as Mourinho, which is true, yet somehow you are trying to portray this as a negative point for Mourinho, which is odd.
[/quote]
When Ranieri took over he wasn't initially handed Romans bucks. He was however the first one to splash the cash on the likes of Makelele, Duff, Cole, Crespo, Veron, Glen Johnson, Wayne Bridge, Gallas and Mutu. A lot of those players helped Mourinho along as did the maturing Terry and Lampard.
Fact of the matter is Mourinho took over a far better team than Ranieri did. And even out-spended him good.
I simply do not fall on my arse over Mourinho's tenure at Chelsea. MOst decentish managers could've achieved the same. Rafa would've probably also won them the Champions League. Which by the way is the trophy Roman craved the most.