Every time I see Caicedo play I feel like I'm watching someone whose primary talent is to be quick enough to catch opposition players and kick them up the arse without getting sent off for it (possibly because he has an undeserved reputation as being more of a footballer than he actually is). I wanted him last summer, I'm glad we didn't get him now.
And on the point of the wider project, what this list highlights is the downside risk of their project. I'm sure all of these guys will be on decent wages-you just can't buy a player for that kind of money without paying him good money. There are some big under-performers in there, some crocks and a player who might be about to get a 2+ year ban for doping. And they're mostly on 7-year contracts.
Incidentally, assuming Mudryk's control sample tests positive, they'll be in their rights not to pay him, but if they bin him off they're taking a £50m write-off. Even if they don't, they'll probably still have a massive financial hit.
There's another tier below this top 10 where they have some good players (e.g. Palmer, who is exceptional, Madueke who is more than decent, Gusto and Jackson who is still a bit raw but might make it). Some of those guys are probably out-performing their wage levels, but Palmer has already had a new contract. That's the folly of the scheme. If a player is out-performing his wage bracket, you will have to give him a new deal on better wages or he'll be off-ski. The idea that he will sit tight on low money under a 7-year deal because he has to is for the birds. By contrast, a player who turns to shit is going to happily sit there and take the money until his deal runs down, or else you'll have to pay him off to move on.
In short, their genius plan, if that is really what the plan is, doesn't work.