But we were top scorers and top of the league at Christmas!!!!
That counts for something surely?*
*If you're retarded
How does it work? Do you arseholes have a separate arsehole or do you shit through yourself?
But we were top scorers and top of the league at Christmas!!!!
That counts for something surely?*
*If you're retarded
And anyone with an iota of common sense would also make allowances* for the decline post Xmas due to injuries, squad depth and AFCON. Unless they have an agenda of course.But we were top scorers and top of the league at Christmas!!!!
That counts for something surely?*
*If you're retarded
Actually if you look at PL winners it's a combination. Almost always one of, if not the, top scorers but also a strong defence. We need to improve in both areas.The issue was our GD, not the amount of goals we scored. Sure, it'd be great to score more goals but it isn't necessary to do so to win things. Sorting out the defence is a necessity, though. We'll win fuck all unless we do that.
You also certainly can't ignore that Everton scored 16 goals less than us and finished 7th. Because they geared their game to feeding Lukaku. Their next highest scorers being Barkley on 6 and then Coleman on 4 !!You certainly can ignore Sprints and distance covered, given that Lukaku is bottom of the league and scored about a zillion goals.
Actually if you look at PL winners it's a combination. Almost always one of, if not the, top scorers but also a strong defence. We need to improve in both areas.
4th highest and as I said that's not good enough.We were one of the top scorers, Frogfish.
4th highest and as I said that's not good enough.
I thought we were talking about winning the PL !Not good enough for what?
4th highest and as I said that's not good enough.
I thought we were talking about winning the PL !
You don't agree that a majority of the time the league winners are in the too 2 of scoring goals?Oh, ok.
I actually probably don't agree. I think if we shore up the defence properly and still score 78 goals next season, we'll go very close to winning the league next season.
But, maybe, as someone pointed out above, our defence will always be somewhat porous due to high pressing nature of our game. So maybe we do need to score 90+ goals.
You don't agree that a majority of the time the league winners are in the too 2 of scoring goals?
Yes you can, because their attacking players were Miralles, Delafeu and Aaron Lennon.You also certainly can't ignore that Everton scored 16 goals less than us and finished 7th. Because they geared their game to feeding Lukaku. Their next highest scorers being Barkley on 6 and then Coleman on 4 !!
Yes you can, because their attacking players were Miralles, Delafeu and Aaron Lennon.
Ours are Mane, Coutinho and Lallana.
Thats a stupid argument.
Sprints and distance covered are ridiculous stats to assess wether a striker is good.
Goals and assists.
They are the striking stats that matter.
The modern trend to find ANY statistics to back up a theory is fucking bollocks.
I bet you can find stats that would make ANY player look amazing.
Certainly every time we are linked to someone there seems to be a photo sayin 3rd in Europe for X, 2nd in Europe for Y, Only Messi and Ronaldo have done more of a certain thing than this player.
Its all crap.
Watch the games, tells you all you need to know.
That is Firmino is a cracking footballer. But not a striker. We need one of those if we want to win the league.
Last 4 seasons
Costa with Chelsea
Vardy with Leicester
Costa with Chelsea
Aguero with City
Who was the last team to win the league without a striker scoring 15+, and how many times has the league been won by such a team?
We need one, and how far Firmino runs wont change that.
Y
Who was the last team to win the league without a striker scoring 15+, and how many times has the league been won by such a team?
No. The important stat is what wins leagues?The important stat is how many teams are scoring and - probably more importantly - conceding. There are a fuck load of players who have scored 15+ in a season and their teams have come nowhere near winning the league. I'd say a more accurate representation would probably be the second and third highest scorers in a title winning side, and what their tallies are. Title winning sides generally score from everywhere.
We win the running tho.....zzzzzzI've done all this research before. The answer is "hardly fucking ever"
No. The important stat is what wins leagues?
Do teams who DO NOT have a prolific striker win leagues? Yes or fucking no?
This it's that a majority of league winners have a 20 goal a season striker, whereas all league winners have a striker who scores at least 15.And the 'prolific' yardstick is now what? 15 goals? It was 20 up until not so long ago.
I'll reply to your post above that deserves a proper comment later - I'm a little busy at the moment. However to answer your question (which I have in fact covered last season with all the stats, during the many debates on this subject) is roughly (can't remember off-hand) about 25%. So not only is it not impossible but it's not infrequent - however we need to balance that fact with another, it hasn't been the case recently.No. The important stat is what wins leagues?
Do teams who DO NOT have a prolific striker win leagues? Yes or fucking no?
I have no idea. Go back and check how many goals the top scorer scored for each team that won the premier league.And the 'prolific' yardstick is now what? 15 goals? It was 20 up until not so long ago.
They each got 7 in the league according to stats I've seen elsewhere.Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but doesn't that stat say he gets a third more assists than anybody else?
No. The important stat is what wins leagues?
Do teams who DO NOT have a prolific striker win leagues? Yes or fucking no?
I reckon solanke will oust firmino by seasons end. Boy has got skills
No im saying we wont win the league without a proper striker.So what's your fucking point. That Klopp doesn't know how to build a team that can win the league? Klopp will use Firmino thats for sure.... so your argument is basically to replace Klopp then we can get rid of Firmino and possibly get a 15 + prolific striker to build the team around.?
No im saying we wont win the league without a proper striker.
No im saying we wont win the league without a proper striker.
But we will run loads
so do you believe Klopp is the right man to bring back the title to Anfield? If "yes" your moaning is pathetic. If "no" who do you want instead?