Danny Ings - Confirmed

[#roadred]

Whoever put the music to that video should be murderedly killed to super death, twice!
How many E's do these fuckers think people pop while reading football forums?
As for Ings, he looks a lot better than any of the back-up strikers who graced our team this year. Welcome Danny Ings!(to the Mad House)

 

[HC]

Hes young and could start for any team below ourselves yet he's settling for a place on the bench..

I hope he's prepared for this.

 

[Bradley]

Hes young and could start for any team below ourselves yet he's settling for a place on the bench..

I hope he's prepared for this.

He probably backs himself enough to believe that he'll take any chances he's given and within 2 years he'll be good enough be our 1st or 2nd choice. Nobody will be complaining if he manages it, if he fails then it's no big lose for Liverpool.

 

[Oncy]

Because at the moment, our strikers at the start of the season will be Ings, Origi, Balotelli, Borini and Lambert.....all third choice strikers.

Look if you have 10 3rd choice strikers you dont NEEEED a first choice one.

 

[Ijg]

Does anyone know who our 2nd choice striker is cause I haven't got a fucking clue.

 

[Oncy]

Odd numbers only Idj.

 

[Ijg]

Odd numbers only Idj.

Oh sorry bro, I'm new to this.

 

[Oncy]

I cant even bring myself to watch that video.
Cos Danny Ings innit.

 

[Ryan]

I cant even bring myself to watch that video.
Cos Danny Ings innit.

Heh, it gets worse.

Here he is as a fucking cliche'd yoof in some Soccer AM production...

 

[gkmacca]

Did Spurs only make an offer just to land us with a bigger fee? They knew he'd already said he wanted to go to us when they offered £12m, and now, apparently, that figure will be used to decide on what compensation we should pay.

 

[Buddha]

Because at the moment, our strikers at the start of the season will be Ings, Origi, Balotelli, Borini and Lambert.....all third choice strikers.

'At the moment'. 9th June.

 

[Buddha]

Did Spurs only make an offer just to land us with a bigger fee? They knew he'd already said he wanted to go to us when they offered £12m, and now, apparently, that figure will be used to decide on what compensation we should pay.

It seems that way.

 

[keniget]

Dickish move but cunning!

He's going to have be more than "decent" if we end up paying 12M.

 

[Glen C]

Apparently Burnley want £8.5m.

 

[mark1975]

I'd expect the league to challenge why Spurs were prepared to pay £12m, knowing a compensation fee would be, at most, half that.

Of course they won't, but that's what would happen if they weren't a bunch of bent fuckers.

 

[Judge Jules]

People should remember that Germany won world cups not because they had the best players but they had the best team.

Ditto us in Istanbul.

 

[Judge Jules]

I'd expect the league to challenge why Spurs were prepared to pay £12m, knowing a compensation fee would be, at most, half that.

Of course they won't, but that's what would happen if they weren't a bunch of bent fuckers.

We can challenge it in the tribunal though. I'd be putting forward the argument that, if they let this blatant piece of sh!t-stirring count for something, the game as a whole will suffer for it.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

'At the moment'. 9th June.

As I say. At the moment.

 

[peterhague]

What kind of fee are these tribunals actually supposed to be determining? What's their stated aim? It can't be market value because they always come in at a fraction of that.

 

[mark1975]

As I say. At the moment.

It's pretty obvious Borini, Lambert and Mario don't have futures.

 

[ILD]

I cant even bring myself to watch that video.
Cos Danny Ings innit.

Ha, I gave it a whirl. It was okay. Danny seems a decent dribbler too btw.

 

[ILD]

What kind of fee are these tribunals actually supposed to be determining? What's their stated aim? It can't be market value because they always come in at a fraction of that.

Is it based on % of wages or anything like that?

 

[peterhague]

Is it based on % of wages or anything like that?

I've honestly no idea. It just seems to be some laughably low amount plucked from thin air.

 

[Mors]

[article]“They would take into account the status of the club the player is leaving, the status of the club he’s joining, the amount of money the club paid when they signed him originally, the length of time he spent at the club and the terms of the contract offered to him by the club he’s at and the club he’s leaving.

“They would also factor in his playing record including any international appearances, as well as any ‘substantiated interest’ shown by other clubs in signing him and reported interest in a player could see the compensation amount rise.

“The panel would also consider other costs, which Burnley would have to provide evidence of, including cost of training and playing facilities, education and welfare requirements, medical facilities, friendly and competitive matches as well as scouting and coaching fees.[/article]

 

[Glen C]

He's so slow and has no change of pace.

 

[jexykrodic]

Is he fast or is he slow?

I've read both now.

 

[white-sox]

He's kind of slowish fast.

 

[peterhague]

He's definitely not fast. I've never seen him play when he's looked anything other than completely average. He's cheap(ish), but even so I'm not sure he's worth it.

 

[Gerry_A_Trick]

People should remember that Germany won world cups not because they had the best players but they had the best team.

Are we going to have the best team now that we have Ings?

 

[cloggypop]

Germany also tend to have absolutely boss players that would walk into our team.