First, there are NO sources and NO original pictures in the article you posted, because entire article is just a re-hash of another article from the Daily Mail. Every picture in the News.com.au is just lifted from Getty Images or AFP, because it's a third rate newspaper from the backwater known as Australia.
Second, the fake picture that Frogfish was referring to IS the "evidence" that the Daily Mail relied on in their article, which suggests the entire article is fake news.
Third, in addition to fake pictures, there are NO sources named in the Daily Mail article, which also suggests that is a made up article.
Fourthly, you have NO idea whether there are still wet markets open in China butchering dogs and kittens and fucking pangolins, but if you are assuming that there must be wet markets open in China because, I don't know, it's... China (not an unreasonable assumption. I'm quite sure there are), then what is the point of posting a fake news article or fake picture? Just make the damn assertion and be done with it.
If the story and the pictures in the article are fake news then it IS fake news, it doesn't matter if the story is probably true. But you won't understand that because you're a fucking idiot pretending to be a lawyer.