Anything is possible ... but as stated it is "highly highly unlikely", what is there in that statement that you can't comprehend you thick twat ? That isn't a zero value. Do you need a conjectural percentage so you can get you can get your brain around it and actually put a value on the meaning of 'unlikely' ?
And no they didn't make any suggestions that it was man-made. Only it's origin.
Though on the subject of being man-made:
.... disease ecologist Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance, dismissed Ebright’s conjecture. “Every time there’s an emerging disease, a new virus, the same story comes out: This is a spillover or the release of an agent or a bioengineered virus,” Daszak says. “It’s just a shame. It seems humans can’t resist controversy and these myths, yet it’s staring us right in the face. There’s this incredible diversity of viruses in wildlife and we’ve just scratched the surface. Within that diversity, there will be some that can infect people and within that group will be some that cause illness.”
No doubt then that it is was deliberately released in the wet market. Or maybe not someone could have just dropped a lab-made vial of this new virus into someone's soup by accident.
Of the 585 samples tested, 33 were positive for 2019-nCoV and all were in the huge market’s western portion, which is where wildlife were sold. “The positive tests from the wet market are hugely important,” says Edward Holmes, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Sydney who collaborated with the first group to publicly release a 2019-nCoV sequence. “Such a high rate of positive tests would strongly imply that animals in the market played a key role in the emergence of the virus.”
Like I said right at the start of the thread: stop eating bats, monkeys, snakes and civet cats