Not peer reviewed or even in a real language.
The good news should be spread far and wide to all peoples in all languages. Perhaps you should make this your mission as penance for your heresy.
Not peer reviewed or even in a real language.
The only thing amazing is the amazing grace of science.
The really amazing thing is the dickwads pushing the vaccine at all costs are inadvertantly making the case for all drugs to be legalised.
The vaccine is killing more people than pretty much every class A / schedule 1 drug (bar fentanyl) so clearly they must also be safe too.
The really amazing thing is the dickwads pushing the vaccine at all costs are inadvertantly making the case for all drugs to be legalised.
The vaccine is killing more people than pretty much every class A / schedule 1 drug (bar fentanyl) so clearly they must also be safe too.
You get weirder everyday.
If you were a scientist, and you had reason to think people were primed to start falling at your feet and worshiping you as an emissary of their new gods, then you would also begin working on developing a suitable vocabulary and response bank ready for that auspicious day.
Dantes, are you going to be starting your own tv channel and asking for donations? I’m wondering what kinds of hymns you’d be doing? Fibonacci sequence? Life of pi?
I find it amazing that a clear vaccine failure is still believed to be evidence it worked.
I want an entire fucking church. Westminster Abbey will do. It even has the blessed remains of some of my fellow prophets there.
I think you should aim for bigger mate ... try the Blue Mosque in Turkey - it's huge, and you'll get the regular and tourists daily.
Dantes, I think you need to break in some new material.The only thing amazing is the amazing grace of science.
What about Vatican City? I’m sure they take euros. And dollars from the fat yanks.But their donations will be in Lira. May as well hand me thoughts and prayers.
Dantes, I think you need to break in some new material.
But their donations will be in Lira. May as well hand me thoughts and prayers.
Oh fair point.
I'd try the new Mosque in Birmingham then - we'll even start a SCM Dantes' Science Fund.
Hahah it's even made of red bricks, looks just like the university.
Facts hurting are they? Your faith in the chief medical officer not what it used to be? Scientists work in mysterious ways, you just need to have faith child and it will all be ok. The myocarditis and the mutations happen for a reason.
The fuck are you on about?
Is science worthless or is it not then? Or only the ones confirming our cognitive bias?
The fact that you're not a scientist. So you are in a position of having to listen to scientists and accept their conclusions on faith. Now there used to be a way to accept conclusions on something else, some other method, I'm sure I read about it once. But we don't need that method, forget I even mentioned it, it's heresy, the conspiracy theorists use that method. You're not one of them thankfully. You have faith, in the science, and that faith will be repaid in the hereafter I promise you this my child. Hush now and book in your booster jab. Every scientist worth their salt has delivered the good news to you about the booster jab, so accept it as the divine gift that it is, accept it at once, you mustn't delay.
Have you taken the covid vaccine?
I didn'tBit weird that you got your daughter vaccinated then
Because you are viewing this through the eyes of "If the person got sick, the vaccination failed."
I'm looking at it through the prism of "If the person got the virus, and didn't come close to getting to a hospital and will Allah willing live a long life, then the vaccination saved a life".
Science has worked here - it may not be perfect, but it's saving lives ... All real scientists, even @dantes admit it (at least when not going after full time yonkerings online)
Yes my child. I have accepted the blood of science into my body during mass vaccination.
His chance of survival wouldn't have been altered greatly by the vaccine. 99.9% of people survived before the vaccine.
I've only read summaries, but a decent amount is based on a few things that aren't true. He says you can't catch it twice and asymptomatic people can't spread it. I know a bunch of people that fall into both camps.
What he says about there being cures, he's wrong about hydroxchloroquine. Should there have been more focus on that early on, yeah, probably should have, they are on the way out now though.
His conclusions feed on from those, so if they're based on falsehoods, it's not a great start.
What I find strangest about the the Peter McCullough stuff, is that he has a paper on a proposal for how to treat Covid, which doesn't have any evidence to suggest it will work. Which is fine, you need to start somewhere, but it's getting a lot of support from people who seem to think the vaccines aren't tested and proven, which is just bizarre. Why would you be ok with his suggestions, and not with the ones that have proven to work with 3bn people.
Most of the things he suggests in that paper from January, have since been tested and proven not to be right, but it doesn't help me get my head around why people are buying into it.