• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?

Forums Unread posts
dantes said:
Let me help you. Earlier in the year you were adamant the us border crossings were just a transient continuation of an earlier trend. I showed you the graphs, tried to explain the mechanisms and correct your view. You did your usual denial, dismissal, insulted me for being a trump fan etc etc. Now here we are. You turned out to be totally wrong. In all honesty, the maths wasn't even hard for that, it was very simple, primary school level thinking required, so it's utterly embarrassing that you got it wrong. It's not a shock that I got it right. Have you learned anything? Nope, apart from how to invent jokes. So you see why I just call you stupid and save the time of trying to explain things to you.
Click to expand...

Do I need to point out the things you got wrong?

And I’m pretty sure I didn’t day border crossings were just a “transient continuation of an earlier trend”. Pretty sure the point I was making was that there was a complex range of issues affecting migration and that only muppets would argue that it was purely down Biden speeches.

(feel free to prove me wrong).

What is it the meds aren’t helping you cope with today?
 
StevieM said:
Do I need to point out the things you got wrong?

And I’m pretty sure I didn’t day border crossings were just a “transient continuation of an earlier trend”. Pretty sure the point I was making was that there was a complex range of issues affecting migration and that only muppets would argue that it was purely down Biden speeches.

(feel free to prove me wrong).

What is it the meds aren’t helping you cope with today?
Click to expand...

I'm willing to bet you were one of the people who would have said Trumps political statements fostered hatred and bigotry and an intolerance of migrants.

If it works one way , surely it can work the other way ?
 
StevieM said:
Get it right Ross.

You can’t wait until you tell us what the complicity theorists are apparently telling us via the media articles that only you read, even though the “complicity theorists” aren’t telling anyone the things you “think” they are.

Meanwhile....
View attachment 2037
Click to expand...

I can guarantee you that when kids start dropping dead from the vaccine some gobshite will tell us kids have always dropped dead and there's no evidence that it's caused by the vaccine.
 
r5t139s64jx71.png
 
StevieM said:
Do I need to point out the things you got wrong?

And I’m pretty sure I didn’t day border crossings were just a “transient continuation of an earlier trend”. Pretty sure the point I was making was that there was a complex range of issues affecting migration and that only muppets would argue that it was purely down Biden speeches.

(feel free to prove me wrong).

What is it the meds aren’t helping you cope with today?
Click to expand...

"No doubt you’ll explanation as to why immigrants getting picked up at the border has been on an upward trajectory since about May of last year and that Biden’s interventions have done nothing to impact that trend either way.

Of course - the immigrants are all hanging on every word Joe Biden before heading to the border.

Catch yourself on Dantes - immigration is a bigger issue than blowing smoke up the hole of your bestest, most favourite President ever."

Aged like a bottle of that BLM wine.
 
Ok, so the dude who reckons he isn't obsessed by US politics has just derailed the covid topic with US politics again, for no discernible reason
 
Woland said:
Ok, so the dude who reckons he isn't obsessed by US politics has just derailed the covid topic with US politics again, for no discernible reason
Click to expand...

The reason is simple. You have a mental block preventing you from drawing conclusions such as kids will drop dead if you vaccinate them, you apparently need to see it first before it becomes a thing. So that's the reason I referred to another thing you had a mental block over in the past, that has now happened, on the off chance it might shake your mind a little to remove the block.
 
dantes said:
"No doubt you’ll explanation as to why immigrants getting picked up at the border has been on an upward trajectory since about May of last year and that Biden’s interventions have done nothing to impact that trend either way.

Of course - the immigrants are all hanging on every word Joe Biden before heading to the border.

Catch yourself on Dantes - immigration is a bigger issue than blowing smoke up the hole of your bestest, most favourite President ever."

Aged like a bottle of that BLM wine.
Click to expand...

Tastes better after a while.
 
Woland said:
Alternatively, you're out of your fucking mind
Click to expand...

My mind makes astonishingly accurate predictions about things, always has and always will. Your minds haplessly stumble from one mistaken belief about a thing to the next, never learning.
 
dantes said:
The reason is simple. You have a mental block preventing you from drawing conclusions such as kids will drop dead if you vaccinate them, you apparently need to see it first before it becomes a thing. So that's the reason I referred to another thing you had a mental block over in the past, that has now happened, on the off chance it might shake your mind a little to remove the block.
Click to expand...

Is getting vaccinated a bad idea?

Are people who get vaccinated dickheads?

Where are your actually at - what’s your graphs telling you?
 
Much like the vaccination and Covid, the statistics shows that the probability of anyone being a dickhead is the same regardless of vaccination status.
 
StevieM said:
Is getting vaccinated a bad idea?

Are people who get vaccinated dickheads?

Where are your actually at - what’s your graphs telling you?
Click to expand...

(1) For old people it's a great idea, for young people it's a terrible idea, for average aged people it's a good idea for the individual and a terrible idea for the entire population

(2) People are dickheads, nothing to do with being virtue signallers or anti vaxxers

(3) Vaccinate old people who are likely to die + dantes, and absolutely nobody else, for a whole range of reasons I can't be arsed explaining again
 
Rosco said:
I'm willing to bet you were one of the people who would have said Trumps political statements fostered hatred and bigotry and an intolerance of migrants.

If it works one way , surely it can work the other way ?
Click to expand...

Yes - Trumps statements fostered hatred & bigotry.

I’m not sure what you mean by “other way” - do you mean Trumps statements could foster “love and tolerance”?
 
dantes said:
(1) For old people it's a great idea, for young people it's a terrible idea, for average aged people it's a good idea for the individual and a terrible idea for the entire population

(2) People are dickheads, nothing to do with being virtue signallers or anti vaxxers

(3) Vaccinate old people who are likely to die + dantes, and absolutely nobody else, for a whole range of reasons I can't be arsed explaining again
Click to expand...

I don’t disagree with (1)

(2) I also agree with

(3) is you being mental again.
 
Rosco said:
Much like the vaccination and Covid, the statistics shows that the probability of anyone being a dickhead is the same regardless of vaccination status.
Click to expand...

Yeah... it’s just dying by being a dickheas is reduced.

Except for you, apparently.
 
StevieM said:
Yes - Trumps statements fostered hatred & bigotry.

I’m not sure what you mean by “other way” - do you mean Trumps statements could foster “love and tolerance”?
Click to expand...

And because the illegal immigrants thought that's what they would be faced with, many stopped arriving.

So when you tell all the migrants they're welcome and then suddenly a massive spike in arrivals happens you don't think the message has anything to do with the numbers ?
 
I don't know, if there was one animal that absolutely positively could do without even the slightest bit of heart inflammation, it'd be the animal who's heart needs to pump blood twelve feet into the air just to reach its brain.
 
dantes said:
I don't know, if there was one animal that absolutely positively could do without even the slightest bit of heart inflammation, it'd be the animal who's heart needs to pump blood twelve feet into the air just to reach its brain.
Click to expand...

I mean, the first article mentions which animals they are planning on vaccinating, and giraffes aren't listed, and its not the human vaccine either....but sure, yeah, who knows
 
I suspect the upkeep of these animals is not financed by woke charities collecting donations. It'll be private equity investors who give the money, in exchange for the returns generated by the zoo. Now that their investment is dead, the two options facing the zoo are to give the monty python routine a try, or otherwise go to their insurers and ask for the payout. In the latter event, we'll get to the exact cause of death of that you can be sure.
 
[article]
Prudentia Capital acquires French zoo under fire for alleged animal cruelty

The Amnéville zoo has been engulfed in financial problems and threatened by compulsory liquidation, following a series of dysfunctions and animal cruelty reports

Private equity firm Prudentia Capital will take control of the Metz-Amnéville zoo in France, in a €25m deal, it said. Engulfed in financial problems, the zoo was threatened by compulsory liquidation after an investigation by a local newspaper alleged serious dysfunctions and animal cruelty.
[/article]

You might put this down to confirmation bias, but lo and behold, dantes' understanding of global financial transactions is spot on again shocker. You love to see it.
 
Alternatively we could offer Gerry and others as an alternate display for the zoo.

You never see ostriches with their head stuck in the sand at the zoo.
 
The whole Facebook is biased but Reuters isn't was brilliant. He almost looked rational.

Then it's radio silence when he's told the Reuters and Facebook fact check is the same thing.
 
Rosco said:
The whole Facebook is biased but Reuters isn't was brilliant. He almost looked rational.

Then it's radio silence when he's told the Reuters and Facebook fact check is the same thing.
Click to expand...

Wait, what? I already respond to too many things in this thread, to be honest.

Reuters and Facebook are not the same. One provides a service, in this case the fact checking, the other uses that service in whatever way they want. Facebook decided to use the fact check, to stop people talking about lab leaks, that's nothing to do with Reuters, who just said there was no evidence (at that time). Facebook were the issue here. It's not in Reuters to be anything other than accurate.

As to funding, why wouldn't Pfizer pay a reputable company to defend their product? What are they supposed to do, just say it's lies themselves? Getting an independent party to verify, or not in some cases, is exactly what I'd expect to happen.

It's like blaming a lawyer for taking money from a defendant. I don't know what other options they have.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom