• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?

It makes a third man who invested most of his capital in the australian property market in order to write off the depreciation against his tax liability, that man will certainly weep when he sees the doom that is upon china and evergrande.

 
mGiQesR.jpg
 
- Milton Friedman (an expert on these things, unless you of course no longer want to follow the science and follow what experts say the moment that doing so hurts your feels)
Fuck me Dantes. How much time did you waste on that. I'll clarify since you are a million miles off tack ... human beings = pieces of shit that will find a way to fuck up anything and everything. Clearer now?
 
Again, I'm not denying that it reduces your chance of seriously getting ill. That's not what I'm taking issue with.

What bothers me is likening unvaccinated people to drunk drivers, the less clean, who should be ostracized from society. They provide no greater threat to the vaccinated than other vaccinated people. It's a very dangerous road to go down. And we already went down it about 80 years ago.
I don't think that's the point Klopp was trying to make (in his German-influenced English). I interpreted it to mean drink-driving reduces the chances of hitting another person, being vaccinated reduces the chances too because if it reduces the chances of you catching it then of course it reduces the chances of passing it on.
 
You guys are all just giving oxygen to the fucking moron fire that are Dantes and Rosco. Can we all just agree to stop and let these two keep posting their retarded nonsense into the vacuum?
 
I don't think that's the point Klopp was trying to make (in his German-influenced English). I interpreted it to mean drink-driving reduces the chances of hitting another person, being vaccinated reduces the chances too because if it reduces the chances of you catching it then of course it reduces the chances of passing it on.

Does it reduce the chances of you catching it, though? The data is very mixed on that.
 
Does it reduce the chances of you catching it, though? The data is very mixed on that.
Actually I think the data is quite clear. Of course many places are now open adding to the factors increasing chances of transmission. So assuming that is correct then it naturally follows that if vaccination reduces the number of people catching it (as a percentage to non-vaccinated) then that equals a lower risk of transmission. To argue otherwise you'd have to strongly believe that being vaccinated doesn't reduce the chance of catching it ... and there are only two people I know (our very own conspiracy theorists natch) that seem to believe that.
 
Yes, just like the data was quite clear that the blood clots were in line with the natural incidence rate in the population and nothing to do with the vaccine. It's comical how you make a virtue out of making one bad prediction after another.
 
Yes, just like the data was quite clear that the blood clots were in line with the natural incidence rate in the population and nothing to do with the vaccine. It's comical how you make a virtue out of making one bad prediction after another.
Mate you are comical full stop. No-one can come close.
 
I don't think that's the point Klopp was trying to make (in his German-influenced English). I interpreted it to mean drink-driving reduces the chances of hitting another person, being vaccinated reduces the chances too because if it reduces the chances of you catching it then of course it reduces the chances of passing it on.

Except that's not what this vaccine does
 
Actually I think the data is quite clear. Of course many places are now open adding to the factors increasing chances of transmission. So assuming that is correct then it naturally follows that if vaccination reduces the number of people catching it (as a percentage to non-vaccinated) then that equals a lower risk of transmission. To argue otherwise you'd have to strongly believe that being vaccinated doesn't reduce the chance of catching it ... and there are only two people I know (our very own conspiracy theorists natch) that seem to believe that.

Hmm... but then there are several well-documented instances of cases being higher than before the vaccinations (Israel and Singapore. There's a couple of instances in Boston, too, I believe).

Of course opening up etc will increase the chance of transmission, but that is still startling, no? It's not how we were told it would go.

Anyway, for like the 27th time, I'm gonna try and be zen and back out. (Not because of you, Froggy). The whole thing is just too exasperating, and all it does is highlight how completely and utterly fucked we are as a species, while also further highlighting how helpless and powerless we are as individuals in the face of gross corruption, incompetence, malfeasance, greed etc etc.

I'm going to simply look forward to when I'm dead and don't have to put up with so many cunts anymore.
 
I don't have the heart to tell you that being dead does not mean what you think it means.

I remember what you said about that years ago. I'm just gonna hope you're wrong. It can't be any worse than what it is now, to be honest
 
https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.39.2100822

This is one of the studies from Israel where they studied a hospital population where 96% of the people were vaccinated. It is the basis for suggesting a booster shot is needed because the people have severe cases and transmission was not stopped by vaccination.

The funny thing is when you get into the data - the milder cases are all unvaccinated people.

So, so 2 of the people on that list were not vaccinated and were ok.
The stats nowadays and the #s overall point to the ending of the 4th wave (though im waiting for #5 obviously) ...
 
Back
Top Bottom