• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Brodge on Sky Sports 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
"After Suarez left he asked the club to get Sanchez, with Lambert as back-up."

English is not my first language. But I assumed what that sentence meant was Lambert was the back-up for Sanchez.
It may read like that, but half an ounce of common sense woudl suggest it wasn't intended just like that. I read it, blinked, shook my head & read it again and realised he meant that he wanted to get Sanchez to be a main striker AND Lambert to be a backup striker.
 
I am also surprised at Lambert being a backup for Sanchez. They are both completely different type of players.

Oh for god's sake, he wasn't meant as like for like, he was meant as a back up striker for cup games, jesus fecking christ!!!
 
Was Rodgers blaming 'the powers that be' for not getting Sanchez and Alli? or just saying we tried and it didn't work out? Imagine how things would have turned out had we had those two?!
 
Oh for god's sake, he wasn't meant as like for like, he was meant as a back up striker for cup games, jesus fecking christ!!!

Calm down. If you read my posts, I have been respectful. I took a quick read and quickly made a wrong assumption.
 
Brendan Rodgers claims he didn't have final say on Liverpool transfers... and signing of Mario Balotelli was club's owners decision

  • Brendan Rodgers spoke publicly for first time since his Liverpool sacking
  • The former Reds manager was a guest on Sky's Goals On Sunday show
  • Rodgers, 42, claims he didn't have the last word on transfers during spell
  • The Northern Irishman insisted he 'always had the final say' in May 2014
  • Ex-Swansea boss said Mario Balotelli signing was club's owners choice
  • He also opened up on missing out on Arsenal winger Alexis Sanchez


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...lli-club-s-owners-decision.html#ixzz3xWmaQ1oU
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
You two are such bellends.
You should shut the fuck up.

I've just watched the interview. You'd have to be a swivel-eyed loon not to conclude he spoke very well and clearly still has great affection for the club.

I couldn't care less whether he has affection for the club of not or whether he speaks well. I don't want any ex manager discussing how the club is run. Be a pundit all he wants but leave how the club is run out of it
 
Ha. If wanting ex managers to not discuss the internal running of the club after they leave makes me a bellend fair enough.

Have you read Shankly's autobiography, or some of his post-LFC interviews? He often talked about such things, quite bitterly. Anyway, Rodgers talking about the committee now is probably the best chance we have of it being pressured to improve or change, so in that sense he's doing us all a favour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mom
Rodgers came across so much better than he ever did for us, there was no cringey spin or triple B , it was refreshing and nice to see actually .

He was pretty muted on the topic of Gerrard leaving , citing there were other reasons but didn't elaborate.

He also talked briefly about the moment he realised Sanchez wasn't coming and the only fit striker he had was Lambert haha 'Bless Rickie , the pressure was a bit much' or something to that affect
 
Rodgers came across so much better than he ever did for us, there was no cringey spin or triple B , it was refreshing and nice to see actually .

He was pretty muted on the topic of Gerrard leaving , citing there were other reasons but didn't elaborate.

He also talked briefly about the moment he realised Sanchez wasn't coming and the only fit striker he had was Lambert haha 'Bless Rickie , the pressure was a bit much' or something to that affect
Like I said earlier this season, Rodgers was / is still a young manager learning his trade. He'll be a far better and more mature manager now than he was when he joined us...and indeed when he left us.
 
Like I said earlier this season, Rodgers was / is still a young manager learning his trade. He'll be a far better and more mature manager now than he was when he joined us...and indeed when he left us.
Oh, I agree completely mate, I genuinely disappointed for how things turned out for Rodgers , he's got plenty of time to get (back?) To the top.
 
I still think he's a great coach who has convinced himself he's a great manager. There's no shame in being a great coach instead of a great, or even just good-ish, manager, but few seem able to embrace the job as it is. But good luck to him anyway.
 
No. You are completely misrepresenting what I am conveying and putting a completely negative spin on it.

Every manager after they are fired, comes up with a list of players they have missed out who in hindsight have turned out to be great players. All I am trying to say is that list is selective whether it is Rafa, Houllier, or Rodgers.

I have a great deal of affection for all three of them and grateful for what they did to our club. But at the same time I dont like them listing the list of players who have turned out great in hindsight. There is a convenient omission of the players they recommended and did not get and turned out to be shit and the players whom they recommended and got and turned out to be shit.

Not all managers get all of their top targets. I dont see King Kenny listing out all the players he missed out on, I am sure there were some. To this day he has protected Commoli and not said a bad word.

Our transfers were poor during the last five years maybe even in the last 20 years whether it is transfer committee, managers, or whomever was incharge. Rafa, Houllier, King Kenny, and Rodgers were not bad managers. Given our budget constraints, our squad weakness, inability to pay top of the level wages - they couldnt make transfer purchases to sustain the squad at the highest level for a long period of time. It is a close to impossible job, I understand. But if Moores, Parry, transfer committee release a list of players these managers actually wanted, I am fairly confident it will not look that rosy as these managers try to make it out in hindsight.

Also for your comment on backup, I am basing mine on gkmacca's statement

"After Suarez left he asked the club to get Sanchez, with Lambert as back-up."

English is not my first language. But I assumed what that sentence meant was Lambert was the back-up for Sanchez.

It's very obvious that Rodgers DID want to sign Sanchez, and that Lambert and Balotelli were not in his plans to lead Liverpool's attack. It's not a secret.


I do agree that he doesn't spend much time discussing the amount of shite he bought though. What was interesting is that our transfer policy and deciosn-making process seems to be ....murky at best. And recent links with the likes of Shane fucking Long don't fill me with confidence.
 
Ah, the ex takes a new shine.
Now where have I experienced that before....

Rodgers defending himself, deflecting responsibility. Nothing new there.
De he mention Benteke?
 
I still think he's a great coach who has convinced himself he's a great manager. There's no shame in being a great coach instead of a great, or even just good-ish, manager, but few seem able to embrace the job as it is. But good luck to him anyway.

Where/what do you think his next job could be? Obviously very tough to say at the min.
 
Where/what do you think his next job could be? Obviously very tough to say at the min.

He's genuinely keen to try working n the Spanish league, so I wouldn't be surprised if he goes there. As for the Premier League is concerned, obviously it will depend on who gets sacked between now and then, but there's HUGE interest within the FA to make him succeed Hodge with England. If he wants that he'll get it.
 
I know...it's as weird as Klopp explaining the same.

To be fair though Peggy, the whole shit at corners thing is something we have drilled and practised to perfection for a while now, so it's gonna take Klopp a while to help us unlearn it, for want of a better phrase.
 
To be fair though Peggy, the whole shit at corners thing is something we have drilled and practised to perfection for a while now, so it's gonna take Klopp a while to help us unlearn it, for want of a better phrase.
We are indeed highly effective at being shit at corners...although to be as fair to Rodgers as you have been to Klopp, it's a state of affairs that dates back much further.
 
We are indeed highly effective at being shit at corners...although to be as fair to Rodgers as you have been to Klopp, it's a state of affairs that dates back much further.

Yup, we were shite at defending corners through Rafa's reign too, it seems to have been our Achilles heel for a good decade really.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom