Plus, as if there are any gay supporters groups watching football. They're all busy watching Bake Off or something.
Plus, as if there are any gay supporters groups watching football. They're all busy watchingBake Offthe rugby or something.
Whatever happened to Anita? I miss herWe used to have a poster here called anita.
She made a point once that stuck with me ... if something offends someone, even if you think its ridiculous, dont say it ... so rent boys offends the LGBT community? Ok, so let's not say it. Granted, this could be a very slippery slope but as I get older, and detach from social media more and more due to the tribal "nuance is dead" approach, I think I'd rather have that approach.
I think it is a very slippery slope as certain people will always find something in which they can find offence. And while your point comes from a good, honest place, and ideally that would be the way forward, those same certain people (a very small but vocal group) will use your empathy against you to further their own agenda. It's a bit of a cliché, but PC gone mad can lead us down some strange and dangerous alleyways.
However, I don't think this is one of those situations, and I suppose I'd be for stopping the chant looking at the grand scheme of things.
Whatever happened to Anita? I miss her
As I said "reduce everything to the individual to justify their position", but its not worth arguing with Dantes
You can excuse someone for saying something unintentionally offensive, provided they're open to the suggestion that what they've said is offensive and use that moment as an opportunity to educate themselves. If they refuse to acknowledge that what they've said is offensive, and get all uppity and defensive, then you've got a problem. Because then you're basically just excusing ignorance and bigotry.No, you have to rely on the intention of the person saying the words. If people intend to offend you, that's what matters and creates inequality and division. If people unintentionally offend you, that doesn't matter. If you then attack those people and limit their freedom based on something you imagined out of thin air, well done, many of those people will now hate you and your community. Then when you get abused for real you can cry more and I will love to see it.
This would be the aforementioned uppity and defensive response that helps nobody.For example, if a hot latin student is sexually discriminated against, I will assist them in obliterating the offender without hesitation. Now imagine if I used some word that was offensive to women or latin people, purely unintentionally, and she then called me out, accused me of ignorance and so forth. That's fine. But now when that student is discriminated against, what do you think I will do? Exactly, sweet fuck all. This constant woke whining is going to result in workplaces and communities where people will do sweet fuck all too. Then you'll see how that works out for vulnerable people.
It's your complete dismissal of sociology that causes you to misread reality.None of that represents what is happening in any one of their brains. You're just misreading reality because you're trying to model it with these fictitious concepts of offence and feels.
This reminds me of women that report guys for asking them out as sexual harassment. Had it been a guy she was crazy about she would have been delighted but because it was the poor village idiot she takes umbrage and reports him.For example, if a hot latin student is sexually discriminated against, I will assist them in obliterating the offender without hesitation. Now imagine if I used some word that was offensive to women or latin people, purely unintentionally, and she then called me out, accused me of ignorance and so forth. That's fine. But now when that student is discriminated against, what do you think I will do? Exactly, sweet fuck all. This constant woke whining is going to result in workplaces and communities where people will do sweet fuck all too. Then you'll see how that works out for vulnerable people.
I'm really not arsed about this. It's not like I've ever started the chant, it's that idiotic herd mentality that you get at footy matches. At the same time I wouldn't want to piss off any of my gay mates if it offended them but was just informed by one that he isn't offended by it at all and fuck Chelsea. That's not to say one individual gay man's opinions are anything to do with the gay community en masse.
If it's horribly offensive then I wouldn't want to be involved. The message I'm getting is it could technically be offensive if you wanted to be a nob about it. And while I don't want to be middle aged white man with no empathy I don't think that counts at football matches.
I could sympathize with this view, if it wasn't for the homophobic culture ingrained in football going back and that gay people have suffered because of it.
Admitting you are gay has not been easy or even possible in the professional football world, not least in England.
Of course Justin Fashanu comes to mind. I am sure there are others less known.
It doesn't cost much to not chant it, as it is indeed homophobic.
Has there ever been a more rentboy name than Billy Gilmour? If Dickens was writing today and wanted to make up a name for someone selling his arse in a Soho bog he'd probs have made it up.*
*This post neither promotes nor dismisses people's individual rights on what they choose to chant at football matches, in no way suggests any agenda, and may contain nuts.
Dantes doesn’t really understand humans at all, does he.
Some sort of coding error I presume.
Ballet. Yeah I think it was. Good film.Wasn't that also the name of the boy in the movie where he wanted to dance instead of boxing?
Billy Elliot