That's his personality, I couldn't care less about it, whether it's good, bad, it makes me cringe that other people care about it, and I get satisfaction from seeing them get upset and triggered by it, it's what they deserve.
Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
That's his personality, I couldn't care less about it, whether it's good, bad, it makes me cringe that other people care about it, and I get satisfaction from seeing them get upset and triggered by it, it's what they deserve.
His personality IS his leadership.
His dereliction of duty with respect to Coronavirus reflects his almost total inability to manage anything other than the appearance of things. That short term thinking is wholly driven by his unbelievable narcissism as well as a lack of any real empathy.
So if I were to conduct a scientific experiment to measure his leadership, I'd conclude pretty quickly that hang on, there is no measurable quantity or meaningful manifestation of his leadership for me to study. That would be because it doesn't exist, it's just a figment of people's emotional attachment to their president. There is not a single thing a citizen can point to and say they were lead to it by Trump or his leadership. Their tax bill, their expenditures, their income, those things are what count and are quantifiable and are derived from the president. So when people discuss his leadership in term of his personality, they're just talking about their own feelings, which is fine, but then when you place those feelings above someone else's tax bill, then you have a problem, namely that you're being a selfish cunt.
The interaction between people, business and politicians occurs through the financial transactions between them all. That's the link between them. The only link. The more the transactions which involve politicians the more you are socialist, the more the transactions which exclude politicians the more you are capitalist. That's it. But the youth of today (and Hansern) seem to have developed a different model, I suspect it came out of an inferiority complex or some desire to remake the world in their image (so that their generation feels as important as mine perhaps). Either way, they've invented new links out of thin air, where all of a sudden the thoughts and feelings 'transacted' between those three participants in the economy have value. Then they talk down to their elders for their backward ways and not understanding or respecting this new social justice warrior type model of theirs. It's completely absurd.
So if you now look at the US from the outside, you have the left disagreeing with the right about a lot of dumb things, and they're on the brink of bloodshed over it. The disagreements about their emotional model should just be binned because it's a figment of their imaginations. Their disagreements about the earlier financial transaction model should be resolved by doing the maths, and getting the correct answer in an objective way. There's no need for any disagreement. Yet the right are generally too thick to do the maths, and the left are also thick but also too afraid of the math hurting their poor feelings. So they're disagreeing over something and refusing to utilise the tried and tested and only way to resolve it. Fuck them. It's a fucking travesty the fruits of the scientific method was bestowed upon these dumb morons. They deserve to be living in caves and being hunter gatherers again, they literally would be if not for their forefathers. Ungrateful unscientific retarded cunts.
Their stupidity has bled out into each side blaming the "leadership" of the other side, as if it were the source of their disagreements. Because 74 million people have a different view from you, and you have no idea how to find the answer to it to convince them otherwise, then orange man bad, it's trumps fault, wah wah wah. It embarrasses me that we're the same species, which is perhaps why I play up my aspergers to at least in some way separate myself from their disintellectual filth.
So if you now look at the US from the outside, you have the left disagreeing with the right about a lot of dumb things, and they're on the brink of bloodshed over it. The disagreements about their emotional model should just be binned because it's a figment of their imaginations. Their disagreements about the earlier financial transaction model should be resolved by doing the maths, and getting the correct answer in an objective way. There's no need for any disagreement. Yet the right are generally too thick to do the maths, and the left are also thick but also too afraid of the math hurting their poor feelings. So they're disagreeing over something and refusing to utilise the tried and tested and only way to resolve it. Fuck them. It's a fucking travesty the fruits of the scientific method was bestowed upon these dumb morons. They deserve to be living in caves and being hunter gatherers again, they literally would be if not for their forefathers. Ungrateful unscientific retarded cunts.
Their stupidity has bled out into each side blaming the "leadership" of the other side, as if it were the source of their disagreements. Because 74 million people have a different view from you, and you have no idea how to find the answer to it to convince them otherwise, then orange man bad, it's trumps fault, wah wah wah. It embarrasses me that we're the same species, which is perhaps why I play up my aspergers to at least in some way separate myself from their disintellectual filth.
19 mins ago, yet another defeat:
Wisconsin’s conservative-controlled Supreme Court has refused to hear Donald Trump’s lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Joe Biden in the battleground state, saying the case must first wind its way through lower courts. It’s the latest legal defeat in a string of losses for the president’s post-election lawsuits.
Wisconsin’s conservative-controlled Supreme Court has refused to hear Donald Trump’s lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Joe Biden in the battleground state, saying the case must first wind its way through lower courts. It’s the latest legal defeat in a string of losses for the president’s post-election lawsuits.
They are spinning it as a victory - saying the Supreme Court refusing to hear their case is therefore “direction” for the lower court to hear it, hence it somehow validates their made-up concerns. These kinds of whopping lies are easy and endless if your ultimate goal isn’t winning court cases or the Presidency, but simply selling alternative reality to idiots.
Is your visual acuity as bad as your reading comprehension?
Dante's news sources are increasingly radical and laughable. He's following a migration of people to an alternate truth space in which trump won. Why someone with such a wretched personality has inspired a personality cult, I don't know, other than that he annoys people they detest.
Last edited:
Oh wait no, it's "alternate" video footage, so what you see there with several suitcases of ballots, it never actually happened, because if it did happen, then AG Barr would have seen the footage and told you it happened, but he implied nothing happened, so the truth is that the footage never happened, and just taking one look at the suspect news source that posted it, there's no reason to hit play, it'd be a waste of a click because there is no footage and so nothing would in fact play.
You are watching oan and right side news network and just asking questions man. Just asking questions.
So if CNN tweet the footage we will answer those questions. If not, it never happened. Got it.
Where do they find these people?!
President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani appeared in Michigan at an at-times heated hearing before the state’s House Oversight Committee to address claims of voter fraud during the 2020 presidential election.
Several witnesses were brought forward with various claims of fraud, each hitting a different role in the election process.
The first witness, Jessy Jacob, who Giuliani said had never before testified, worked as an election worker in Detroit and complained about how she was treated by her supervisors. She also alleged election workers were coached on how to alter ballots and said she was advised not to request voter identification.
Jacob said she did not listen to the instructions and continued to ask voters for ID, for her “peace of mind.”
Jacob's testimony lasted nearly an hour -- which Chairman Rep. Matthew Hall, a Republican, requested be shortened to no more than 10 minutes for each of the following witnesses – and ended with a question from Rep. David LaGrand, a Democrat, asking Jacob if she was aware that Michigan does not require that voters show their identification in order to cast their vote, adding he's “always voted that way.”
Jacob seemed frustrated before citing a law that requires “zero to 14 days before registration time, you have to provide proof of residency.” LaGrand concluded his time saying she was “confused.”
Her testimony came under further scrutiny after Rep. Darrin Camilleri, a Democrat, asked why her testimony should be considered believable when Judge Timothy Kenny dismissed her case due to a lack in credibility.
“I am not aware any such ruling; she’s never been a witness in court,” Giuliani said before Jacob answered.
Camilleri repeated his question and reiterated Kennedy's decision before Giuliani yelled “objection,” further irritating Camilleri.
“This is not a courtroom, this is a committee. Why do you keep objecting to what I’m saying here?” the Michigan representative threw back at Giuliani.
The hearing, which lasted well over the originally planned three-hour timeline, was interrupted with several calls for order by the chairman as the audience kept calling out from their seats. Committee members who were growing frustrated with the testimonies, several of which had already been deemed un-credible in the courts, also repeatedly interrupted proceedings.
The next witness, Melissa Carone, claimed that Jacob’s allegations were not credible “because she wasn’t even there.”
Carone had her own complaints, alleging that as a Dominion technician during election night, she witnessed Democratic votes being recounted up to “30,000” times.
The chairman had to smack his gavel several times throughout her testimony, which also lasted longer than the requested 10 minutes, due to interruptions of committee members and cheers from her supporters in the back of the room.
Carone concluded her testimony by alleging a theory that all the election workers were in on a scheme together to rig the election.
“Democrats like to ruin your lives,” she said as supporters applauded and Hall hit his gavel calling for order, “just like they do to Trump,” she added.
The testimony was an opportunity for the Oversight Committee to hear the allegations people have made of voter fraud during the election, though none of the “witnesses” were under oath – a circumstance that Rep. Cynthia Johnson, a Democrat, took issue with, repeatedly calling for them to be under oath.
Hall told Fox News that the reason they were not under sworn testimony is because the hearing was meant as “informational working sessions” and not as “legal proceedings.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“We’re an Oversight committee looking at how the election was conducted in Michigan and trying to find ways we can improve moving forward,” Hall said.
“What we’re trying to do is look into these allegations, to bring things to light that happened and to look forward to future elections, improving laws on the books so they run smoother and we can restore public confidence,” he added.
President Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani appeared in Michigan at an at-times heated hearing before the state’s House Oversight Committee to address claims of voter fraud during the 2020 presidential election.
Several witnesses were brought forward with various claims of fraud, each hitting a different role in the election process.
The first witness, Jessy Jacob, who Giuliani said had never before testified, worked as an election worker in Detroit and complained about how she was treated by her supervisors. She also alleged election workers were coached on how to alter ballots and said she was advised not to request voter identification.
Jacob said she did not listen to the instructions and continued to ask voters for ID, for her “peace of mind.”
Jacob's testimony lasted nearly an hour -- which Chairman Rep. Matthew Hall, a Republican, requested be shortened to no more than 10 minutes for each of the following witnesses – and ended with a question from Rep. David LaGrand, a Democrat, asking Jacob if she was aware that Michigan does not require that voters show their identification in order to cast their vote, adding he's “always voted that way.”
Jacob seemed frustrated before citing a law that requires “zero to 14 days before registration time, you have to provide proof of residency.” LaGrand concluded his time saying she was “confused.”
Her testimony came under further scrutiny after Rep. Darrin Camilleri, a Democrat, asked why her testimony should be considered believable when Judge Timothy Kenny dismissed her case due to a lack in credibility.
“I am not aware any such ruling; she’s never been a witness in court,” Giuliani said before Jacob answered.
Camilleri repeated his question and reiterated Kennedy's decision before Giuliani yelled “objection,” further irritating Camilleri.
“This is not a courtroom, this is a committee. Why do you keep objecting to what I’m saying here?” the Michigan representative threw back at Giuliani.
The hearing, which lasted well over the originally planned three-hour timeline, was interrupted with several calls for order by the chairman as the audience kept calling out from their seats. Committee members who were growing frustrated with the testimonies, several of which had already been deemed un-credible in the courts, also repeatedly interrupted proceedings.
The next witness, Melissa Carone, claimed that Jacob’s allegations were not credible “because she wasn’t even there.”
Carone had her own complaints, alleging that as a Dominion technician during election night, she witnessed Democratic votes being recounted up to “30,000” times.
The chairman had to smack his gavel several times throughout her testimony, which also lasted longer than the requested 10 minutes, due to interruptions of committee members and cheers from her supporters in the back of the room.
Carone concluded her testimony by alleging a theory that all the election workers were in on a scheme together to rig the election.
“Democrats like to ruin your lives,” she said as supporters applauded and Hall hit his gavel calling for order, “just like they do to Trump,” she added.
The testimony was an opportunity for the Oversight Committee to hear the allegations people have made of voter fraud during the election, though none of the “witnesses” were under oath – a circumstance that Rep. Cynthia Johnson, a Democrat, took issue with, repeatedly calling for them to be under oath.
Hall told Fox News that the reason they were not under sworn testimony is because the hearing was meant as “informational working sessions” and not as “legal proceedings.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“We’re an Oversight committee looking at how the election was conducted in Michigan and trying to find ways we can improve moving forward,” Hall said.
“What we’re trying to do is look into these allegations, to bring things to light that happened and to look forward to future elections, improving laws on the books so they run smoother and we can restore public confidence,” he added.
The reason why I'm not bothering to treat your points one by one is because you've raised 50 and then when the facts win out, and they are shown to have sensible explanations, or even be fabricated you move onto the next one. Meanwhile the ones that are pled in court fail due to a lack of credible evidence.
Trump knows what he's doing, he doesn't need or care to make a real legal argument. He doesn't have one, but if he gish gallops his way through the jizz drenched neck beard world of the internet, people like you will endlessly follow the next shiny what about what about, even if with a moment's glance backward, your path is littered with evidence of your own folly.
I don't watch CNN. You on the other hand are voraciously consuming news media whose popularity has spiked based on them not accepting a fact. That's quite the origin story for a successful "news" network.
Trump knows what he's doing, he doesn't need or care to make a real legal argument. He doesn't have one, but if he gish gallops his way through the jizz drenched neck beard world of the internet, people like you will endlessly follow the next shiny what about what about, even if with a moment's glance backward, your path is littered with evidence of your own folly.
I don't watch CNN. You on the other hand are voraciously consuming news media whose popularity has spiked based on them not accepting a fact. That's quite the origin story for a successful "news" network.
Do you, though? There's other shit going on right now that's more important than trump's ego or desire to keep doing rallys for money, and definitely more important than trying to argue that the sky is red, not blue.
Ok the solutions to that stuff are discovered using precisely the techniques you refer to as alternative truth. Trump going to court does not prevent someone solving covid. Trump not mentioning covid for a month whilst playing golf, also makes fuck all difference to solving covid.
What makes a difference is turning people into brainless compliant liberal idiots. Then you have a population which lacks the brains to do anything but talk about how much they want the solution, but they won't get it. That's your fault for not realising talk is cheap and meaningless. I'd despise you if you weren't a red.
Depends on what I’m looking at?
Surely Dantes - in your tirade against people who don’t seek the truth through science and who rely on feeling- you must realise that the bloke you idolise only cares for science when it supports his position and everything he’s done is built on appealing to “feelings” and less about facts than arguably any other modern politician.
I mean... Make America Great Again - it’s just a meaningless slogan that fits on the front of T-Shirts and baseball caps with no measure of success?
I mean... Make America Great Again - it’s just a meaningless slogan that fits on the front of T-Shirts and baseball caps with no measure of success?
Trump modeled the very worst behavior because he thought of covid as a problem in terms of his reelection, and not a public health problem. He undermined good public health policy from the very beginning. Hey, remember when pence wrote that we weren't in a second wave, if you need a reminder, it was right at the start of the second wave. Remember when we turned the corner? Remember when it would disappear by easter?
Remember when he made not wearing a mask a sign of macho defiance? It landed him in the hospital, the dumb cunt, and they continue doing the same thing.
The us is a horrible patchwork of different responses state by state, but even within that there's assholes not complying, and people making sacrifices to do the right thing. Trump was the champion of the assholes, and like them, he hosted super spreader events repeatedly. They are back to doing it now. Christmas parties, masks off, eating and drinking indoors.
Trump killed tens of thousands by his words and actions.
Idolise? You misunderstand how a chance encounter between Trump and Dantes would actually play out.
I don't expect science from people. I expect questions, curiosity, and their best effort to be correct about something by using the level of analysis they are capable of. I don't expect that from Trump when speaking to his electorate because his overriding concern is victory not veracity. The people have no overriding concern, yet idiotically think they do and that it is their feelings.
I have not advanced the fraud case with an argument akin to the above, which is the point here.
I just advanced it here with CCTV of election workers breaking the law. You won't accept that CCTV because of its source. Having ignored that, you reiterate Trump is responsible for thousands of covid deaths because of his behaviour, and assert that to me with feelings and words.
The BLM rallies dwarfed the Trump rallies allegedly. Well certainly in total and in duration they did. That is what a lawyer would challenge your feelings on.
The masks would have to have magical properties of repulsion to be effective. That's what a chemical engineer would challenge your feelings on.
The masks would have to have magical properties of repulsion to be effective. That's what a chemical engineer would challenge your feelings on.
Similar threads
