I haven't read the story.
Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
I haven't read the story.
If you believe OANN
OAN streamed the unedited uninterrupted video of the hearing. Your second hand fact check was written by... Editor-in-Chief Alan Duke co-founded Lead Stories after ending a 26-year career with CNN
Unedited.. *giggles*
Bless.
I do you a disservice there. You said hearing. I thought you meant the CCTV footage itself.
How do you edit a live stream? It will indeed involve some sort of blessing or miracle to do it I suspect.
As above
Ohh so the lawyer who subpoenaed state farm arena for the video, she then doctored it, bribed the person fast forwarding over the irrelevant bits to pretend it was unedited footage, then presented it before a senate hearing, and is now presumably hoping nobody at the stadium grasses her up for perjury?
Sure thing.
No, it's doctored. And we all know who did it. Who the only person walking this earth is that could do such a thing. With the photoshop skills to make such a realistic looking fake.
Avvy. How much money did they pay you? You treacherous bastard!
Ahahahahahahaha ! Watching/listening to this clown is better than Monty Python.
Trump’s team has now lost 46 post-election lawsuits following several fresh losses in several states on Friday.
Trump has notched just one small victory, a case challenging a decision to move the deadline to provide missing proof of identification for certain absentee ballots and mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania, which had in fact already been implemented prior to the court's decision.
Five more losses came on Friday.
The Trump campaign lost its bid to overturn the results of the election in Nevada
A Michigan appeals court rejected a case from his campaign.
The Minnesota supreme court dismissed a challenge brought by GOP lawmakers.
In Arizona, a judge threw out a bid to undo Biden’s victory there, concluding that the state’s Republican party chairwoman failed to prove fraud or misconduct and that the evidence presented at trial wouldn’t reverse Trump’s loss.
The Wisconsin supreme court also declined to hear a lawsuit brought by a conservative group over Trump’s loss.
Trump has notched just one small victory, a case challenging a decision to move the deadline to provide missing proof of identification for certain absentee ballots and mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania, which had in fact already been implemented prior to the court's decision.
Five more losses came on Friday.
The Trump campaign lost its bid to overturn the results of the election in Nevada
A Michigan appeals court rejected a case from his campaign.
The Minnesota supreme court dismissed a challenge brought by GOP lawmakers.
In Arizona, a judge threw out a bid to undo Biden’s victory there, concluding that the state’s Republican party chairwoman failed to prove fraud or misconduct and that the evidence presented at trial wouldn’t reverse Trump’s loss.
The Wisconsin supreme court also declined to hear a lawsuit brought by a conservative group over Trump’s loss.
$207m received in donations.
$8.8m spent on legal efforts including $2.3m on lawyers.
https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN28E2VG
$8.8m spent on legal efforts including $2.3m on lawyers.
https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN28E2VG
That mad woman ranting about the machines at the hearing the other day has just finished 12 months probation for charges related to computer crime. And she was saying she couldn't get a job because she'd come forward. They'll just keep wheeling out nutjobs to get the donations.
Dantes is a fucking twat living in his mum’s basement, with nothing to do except reading shit on the internet, posting it here, and tugging his nob. Rosco doesn’t believe any of it - he just likes winding everyone up and watching the reaction.
Ross is motivated by the opportunity to disagre with Froglish, Hansern and StevieM.
Dantes has no excuse or reason to be posting this much on the American election. But then again, Dantes is nuts. But he know he's nuts. You do you Dantes.
“No, I didn’t hear any facts or evidence,“ tweeted the Pennsylvania attorney general, Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, after watching the video Wednesday night. “What I did hear was a sad Facebook rant from a man who lost an election.”
Hah another good one!
You could easily not be "nuts" at the flick of a switch. I could be you, think like you, and say things like you, on a whim. Not a problem at all. That doesn't work in reverse though, you couldn't replicate the way my brain works, not with decades of training and practice would you even come close. So why do I chose to be "nuts"?
[article]
How did the universe come to be? It is perhaps the greatest Great Mystery, and the root of all the others. "All other mysteries lie downstream of this question," said Ann Druyan, the author and widow of astronomer Carl Sagan. "It matters to me because I am human and do not like not knowing."
[/article]
I could answer her question for her, because of the way I think and that the rest of yous can never replicate. So now imagine you telling me that I'm "nuts" and my thought processes are inferior to yours. You're not going to win that conversation. So I might be sitting in an uncomfortable chair that causes all sorts of pain and emotional isolation, but I'm tucking into a kobe steak. You're sat in the most comfortable soft chairs, padded, make you feel all good, alongside all the other people, telling me what the fuck I'm doing over here all alone, but you're tucking into macd rat burgers, so I'm more than good where I am.
I see old Trumpster is at it again in Georgia. A rally with 5-6000 people without masks, and used the whole time to speak more ramblings and lies about the election.
Yet 200 000 people are confirmed infected in just one day, showing what a horrendous state the country is in. And here he is doing what he does, the massive prick.
Yet 200 000 people are confirmed infected in just one day, showing what a horrendous state the country is in. And here he is doing what he does, the massive prick.
You don't know how to analyse the efficacy of masks. You don't know how to analyse election law. You don't know how to analyse infection rates. You don't know how to analyse the state of the country. What you really wanted to say is that Trump is a prick, but have to justify that somehow, so you invoke a bunch of stuff you're too stupid to understand, and then because nobody will question that Trump is a prick, they won't question that stuff either. That's the perfect way to remain perpetually stupid.
If I was deaf, then yes I would be quite interested in what other people say they heard.
I bow to no one.
Wouldn't it be entertaining if someone were to sue him for manslaughter ... for effectively his 'actions' with regard to Covid could be construed as amounting to that.
Last edited:
Similar threads
