• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

Yeah, that paternalistic approach shouldn't have occured and was a mistake. The cdc failed on early testing too, clearly.

I'm not sure how that speaks to what trump did from April to now. It wasn't just masks either. He undermined lockdowns, distancing, masks, testing. You know, everything.

The lockdown models were laughably bad. Waste of money and time listening too. The distancing advice was arbitrary nonsense, wash your hands, oh shit no it's airborne distance, uh, 2m, yeah, except in these locations when 1m is fine, yeah, trust us we're scientists. Masks, won't get into that again.

Whatever his faults, Trump doesn't like people who work for him to be bullshitters, and he fires them. Combined with the protests in June. I would also say right, fuck all your bullshit, you have no answers, no plan, the stuff you tell me you have no idea what you're even talking about, so get fucked, we're opening up and making some money again before we head into a catastrophic depression. It was the right call. You couldn't sustain a lockdown for much longer, and wasted the one you had with the rioting.
 
Have I ?

And it appears Smartmatic are responsible for the software that's used by the Dominion machines in any event.

I don’t know, have you?

Don’t recall suggesting you had.

I’m sure Smartmatic are responsible for the software in many different voting machines across many US states and other countries.
 
I don’t know, have you?

Don’t recall suggesting you had.

I’m sure Smartmatic are responsible for the software in many different voting machines across many US states and other countries.

Would you like to comment on the appropriateness of his appointment by Biden ?

There's a remarkable unwillingness by the Creepy Joe fans to engage on it.
 
There is no ethidence that his appointment was inappropriate or linked to an unethidenced allegation of voter fraud.
 
I don’t know, have you?

Don’t recall suggesting you had.

I’m sure Smartmatic are responsible for the software in many different voting machines across many US states and other countries.

Didnt they also work together during Bidens time as VP for Obama?
[bcolor=#ffffff]
"On April 28, 2015, he was nominated by President​
[/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]Barack Obama[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff]
to be the administrator of the​
[/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]Transportation Security Administration[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff]
.​
[/bcolor][bcolor=#ffffff]
On June 23, 2015, Vice Admiral Neffenger was confirmed by the Senate to be the next Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).​
[/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]Department of Homeland Security[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff]
Secretary​
[/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]Jeh Johnson[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff] released a statement on June 24: "Last night the Senate voted 81–1 to confirm Vice Admiral Peter Neffenger, the current Vice Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, to be the next Administrator of TSA. Admiral Neffenger understands the challenges we face, and I know he is ready to take them on at TSA. During his 30-year career in the Coast Guard, Admiral Neffenger proved himself to be an effective operator and commander. I have utmost faith in Pete Neffenger, and I am confident he will be a strong leader of TSA." [/bcolor]

And Smartmatic also deliver these solutions:
[bcolor=#ffffff]The company also produces [/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]smart cities[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff] solutions[/bcolor][bcolor=#ffffff] (including [/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]public safety[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff] and [/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]public transportation[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff]), [/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]identity management[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff] systems for [/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]civil registration[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff] and [/bcolor]
[bcolor=transparent]authentication[/bcolor]
[bcolor=#ffffff] products for government applications. [/bcolor]

[bcolor=#ffffff]Thats a decent fit for being involved with Homeland security AGAIN, and you could say he has quite the experience that could be valuable in that regard. [/bcolor]

[bcolor=#ffffff]But no, everything is voter fraud and SPECTRE are taking over the World.[/bcolor]
 
I was reading an article about a murder conviction in Ireland today:

There were no witnesses, nobody could say when, why or how the victim was killed.

Yet a guy was convicted of murder, beyond a reasonable doubt because there was some DNA evidence on the victim, and CCTV of the defendants car in the location of the murder, his telephone was also pinged at the same location around the time of the murder.

Despite their being no smoking gun, he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt with the prosectilution Senior Counsel making the remark that:

"when coincidence is placed on top of coincidence when does it become an affront to your common sense".


Where has everyone's common sense gone ?
 
Did the prosecution of that crime take the form of posting a bunch of shit from Twitter, each thing rubbished, one after the next, from dead voters, to statistical irregularities, to monitoring issues, to mail in voting, to post dated ballots, and on and on and on? He won the case right, it wasn't say, thrown out and added to a pile of horseshit. It wasn't abandoned?

Ah well, fuck pattern recognition. We are on to the next thing. Why evaluate our biases or the font of feces we draw from. Now it's a member of bidens transition team. Ok.
 
Reset? Is this the socialist conspiracy theory terminology for it? It's just a word, probably chosen so that your mind doesn't have to accept the blindingly obvious truth that the doom was just an inevitable disastrous consequence of choosing socialism instead of capitalism.
 
Would you like to comment on the appropriateness of his appointment by Biden ?

There's a remarkable unwillingness by the Creepy Joe fans to engage on it.

It is certainly concerning, I have to say. I'm also surprised they named him before inauguration as they've put something in the open that is very easily audited & challenged.
 
Biden the socialist. Oh boy, are his backers going to be disapointed. His campaign was largely funded by billionaires in finance and securities, and he ran on a center right platform. They'll never see it coming.

They are all socialists on wall street. Not for the reason you're a socialist. More for the reason that Hugo Chavez was.
 
I was reading an article about a murder conviction in Ireland today:

There were no witnesses, nobody could say when, why or how the victim was killed.

Yet a guy was convicted of murder, beyond a reasonable doubt because there was some DNA evidence on the victim, and CCTV of the defendants car in the location of the murder, his telephone was also pinged at the same location around the time of the murder.

Despite their being no smoking gun, he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt with the prosectilution Senior Counsel making the remark that:

"when coincidence is placed on top of coincidence when does it become an affront to your common sense".


Where has everyone's common sense gone ?

Was that the Sophie Toscan de Plantier case by any chance?

There's a podcast all about that called West Cork which is pretty interesting...as you're listening, one episode you hear a load of stuff and you're going "Oh my god, this guy is totally innocent, this is outrageous!" And then by the end of the next episode you're going "What was I thinking, he's guilty as sin!" Then switch back, and back again...it's a really interesting case.

The Suzanne Pilley case in Edinburgh is equally interesting, and probably even more baffling how they got a conviction
 
Was that the Sophie Toscan de Plantier case by any chance?

There's a podcast all about that called West Cork which is pretty interesting...as you're listening, one episode you hear a load of stuff and you're going "Oh my god, this guy is totally innocent, this is outrageous!" And then by the end of the next episode you're going "What was I thinking, he's guilty as sin!" Then switch back, and back again...it's a really interesting case.

The Suzanne Pilley case in Edinburgh is equally interesting, and probably even more baffling how they got a conviction

No. Ian Bailey was never convicted in that one. That's a huge legal saga over here. There was an extradition request from France recently that the Irish High Court refused.

He was definitely stitched up by the Guards and that's why he wasn't convicted. I still think he did it
 
No. Ian Bailey was never convicted in that one. That's a huge legal saga over here. There was an extradition request from France recently that the Irish High Court refused.

He was definitely stitched up by the Guards and that's why he wasn't convicted. I still think he did it

By the end, I wasn't sure...

He's deffo fucking right weird and not quite right in the head, so if some new evidence came to light that showed he'd done it, I wouldn't be at all surprised.

But equally if it turned out it was all just a massive attention-seeking thing on his part and he wasn't guilty, I wouldn't be shocked either.

It's an odd case
 
I was reading an article about a murder conviction in Ireland today:

There were no witnesses, nobody could say when, why or how the victim was killed.

Yet a guy was convicted of murder, beyond a reasonable doubt because there was some DNA evidence on the victim, and CCTV of the defendants car in the location of the murder, his telephone was also pinged at the same location around the time of the murder.

Despite their being no smoking gun, he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt with the prosectilution Senior Counsel making the remark that:

"when coincidence is placed on top of coincidence when does it become an affront to your common sense".


Where has everyone's common sense gone ?

He's going to get off, isn't he?
 
So still no reasonable explanation for a Director of a voting software company joining Biden's transition team shortly after Biden wins an election with his software ?

Grand.


So let's assume, as you have been suggesting, that Biden has pulled off an election fraud the likes of which a Western democracy has never seen, in the order of hundreds of thousands, or maybe you mean even millions of votes. He has done so with the connivance of those providing the voting software. So at this sensitive time, when the incumbent President is shouting fraud from the rooftops, wouldn't you actually be a bit careful of seeming to reward the architect of this, the greatest voting swindle in the history of democracy? Wouldn't one reward this dark overlord of fraud in the fullness of time rather than jumping in straight away with high-fives and fist bumps, and jobs for the boys?
 
So let's assume, as you have been suggesting, that Biden has pulled off an election fraud the likes of which a Western democracy has never seen, in the order of hundreds of thousands, or maybe you mean even millions of votes. He has done so with the connivance of those providing the voting software. So at this sensitive time, when the incumbent President is shouting fraud from the rooftops, wouldn't you actually be a bit careful of seeming to reward the architect of this, the greatest voting swindle in the history of democracy? Wouldn't one reward this dark overlord of fraud in the fullness of time rather than jumping in straight away with high-fives and fist bumps, and jobs for the boys?

That's what they want you to think. It's a double bluff.

Did Ross ever answer who he would've voted for in a straight shoot between these two?
 
Democrat's law firm called up Trump's counsel and left some sort of abusive voicemail. Cancel culture at play. They ratted him or her out.

[article]
Since this case was filed, undersigned counsel has been subjected to continuous harassment in the form of abusive e-mails, phone calls, physical and economic threats, and even accusations of treason – all for representing the President of the United States’ campaign in this litigation.

On November 14, 2020 at 8:43am, an attorney at Kirkland & Ellis left a one-minute voicemail for undersigned counsel. The voicemail, which has been provided to counsel of record from Kirkland & Ellis in this case and will be provided to the Court via email upon request, speaks for itself and by any measure falls afoul of standards of professional conduct.

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-co...-J.-Trump-for-President-v-Boockvar-Doc131.pdf
[/article]


Pathetic. The democrat woke lawyers then tried to say he was acting on his own.

[article]
That associate was acting unilaterally, in his personal capacity, without the knowledge or authorization of undersigned counsel or the Firm.

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-co...-J.-Trump-for-President-v-Boockvar-Doc132.pdf
[/article]

Trump's lawyers are like yeah nah, fucking explain yourselves.

[article]
In general, every lawyer at a firm is counsel to every client of that firm. That bedrock principle of the Rules is supposed to ennoble the profession and humble its practitioners. Yet one of the world’s largest law firms thinks its very size excuses the conduct of one of its lawyers. But size is not a defense. And one could be forgiven for being skeptical that this voicemail had nothing whatsoever to do with Kirkland & Ellis’s representation in this case out of the same office.

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-co...-J.-Trump-for-President-v-Boockvar-Doc132.pdf
[/article]


Hahahah the fucking state of these law firms. Rest assured if dantes was lead counsel, this would have played out very differently.
 
Democrat's law firm called up Trump's counsel and left some sort of abusive voicemail. Cancel culture at play. They ratted him or her out.

[article]
Since this case was filed, undersigned counsel has been subjected to continuous harassment in the form of abusive e-mails, phone calls, physical and economic threats, and even accusations of treason – all for representing the President of the United States’ campaign in this litigation.

On November 14, 2020 at 8:43am, an attorney at Kirkland & Ellis left a one-minute voicemail for undersigned counsel. The voicemail, which has been provided to counsel of record from Kirkland & Ellis in this case and will be provided to the Court via email upon request, speaks for itself and by any measure falls afoul of standards of professional conduct.

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-co...-J.-Trump-for-President-v-Boockvar-Doc131.pdf
[/article]


Pathetic. The democrat woke lawyers then tried to say he was acting on his own.

[article]
That associate was acting unilaterally, in his personal capacity, without the knowledge or authorization of undersigned counsel or the Firm.

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-co...-J.-Trump-for-President-v-Boockvar-Doc132.pdf
[/article]

Trump's lawyers are like yeah nah, fucking explain yourselves.

[article]
In general, every lawyer at a firm is counsel to every client of that firm. That bedrock principle of the Rules is supposed to ennoble the profession and humble its practitioners. Yet one of the world’s largest law firms thinks its very size excuses the conduct of one of its lawyers. But size is not a defense. And one could be forgiven for being skeptical that this voicemail had nothing whatsoever to do with Kirkland & Ellis’s representation in this case out of the same office.

https://electioncases.osu.edu/wp-co...-J.-Trump-for-President-v-Boockvar-Doc132.pdf
[/article]


Hahahah the fucking state of these law firms. Rest assured if dantes was lead counsel, this would have played out very differently.

What a bunch of snow flake fannies/knobs, man/woman up...
 
I for one would have used my skills to find out who the attorney was, pull up next to him whilst he's going for a coffee, stick him in the backseat, then explain how thanks to his voicemail he now belongs to dantes, and he better be in the same place tomorrow with a brown envelope stuffed full of privileged emails and documents.

Once the case was won, he'd unfortunately be a loose end that needed tying up, where he would learn what happens when you harass a psychopath.
 
Would you like to comment on the appropriateness of his appointment by Biden ?

There's a remarkable unwillingness by the Creepy Joe fans to engage on it.

Ok.

It looks like a situation you could out 2+2 together, get 5 and start claiming it’s well dodgy.

In reality it’s likely completely irrelevant.

He was Chairman if the Board - which isn’t an operational role.

He looks like he has the experience, qualifications, skills and knowledge for the role he’s going into - which, as I understand it is to aid the transition.

It’s also a volunteer position.

So - a well qualified person whi’s ideal for a particular task, volunteer’s to join a transition team for said task.

As rewards go for being an integral part of the biggest electoral fraud ever perpetrated against man to benefit Joe Biden - I’d be a bit miffed.

So... yeah... nothing to see here other than people making up shit.
 
Ok.

It looks like a situation you could out 2+2 together, get 5 and start claiming it’s well dodgy.

In reality it’s likely completely irrelevant.

He was Chairman if the Board - which isn’t an operational role.

He looks like he has the experience, qualifications, skills and knowledge for the role he’s going into - which, as I understand it is to aid the transition.

It’s also a volunteer position.

So - a well qualified person whi’s ideal for a particular task, volunteer’s to join a transition team for said task.

As rewards go for being an integral part of the biggest electoral fraud ever perpetrated against man to benefit Joe Biden - I’d be a bit miffed.

So... yeah... nothing to see here other than people making up shit.

Your understanding is incorrect. The senile creepy old cunt is effectively appointing his administration, and the transition isn't some process that he needs an entire staff to assist him with the way his nurse assists him in taking a shit. Rather the transition is for his future administration picks to liaise with the current white house administration to hand over their duties smoothly.
 
Back
Top Bottom