Big D vs Twitter

[dantes]

I think you missed the point(although you're talking about something else valid. It's not the actual boundaries and who's in each one, for the pure maths discussion in this case. It's that the boundaries are in anyway judged be population. If boundaries were purely done on geographical size i.e. every 10 km2, then Benfords law would apply, as population sizes would be randomly distributed amongst them. But they're not, they're designed to have roughly the same size of population.

The population sizes are still randomly distributed in the politically manipulated precinct boundaries. They will form a bell shape curve which is roughly symmetrical around the mean. The problem with the maths is that the bell shaped curve is squashed into too narrow a range on the x axis. So not exactly to do with randomness, and more to do with variance.

 

[dantes]

Lol at the 100+ hours Dantes has put into this thread

Someone had to get it over the 100 pages required to ensure Big D retains the presidency.

 

[Richey]

Someone had to get it over the 100 pages required to ensure Big D retains the presidency.

That doesn't seem to have worked yet. 200 perhaps?

 

[dantes]

That doesn't seem to have worked yet. 200 perhaps?

Let's not get carried away, 200 might tip the balance toward him becoming president of earth, which you will agree is something that deservedly belongs to myself should such a position arise in future.

 

[dantes]

From what I understand it was the Republicans that changed many of the boundaries after the 2016 election so you may have a point. Biden should have won by a lot more.

They did suspiciously well in this election. Almost as if when they went out spending Big D's campaign funding to speak to their voter base, they spewed vile and treacherous lies along the lines of "you don't have to vote for trump, he was never my friend anyway, but vote for me at least, I'm not like trump".

 

[Richey]

Let's not get carried away, 200 might tip the balance toward him becoming president of earth, which you will agree is something that deservedly belongs to myself should such a position arise in future.

Not sure that I would dare to disagree

 

[Hansern]

Classy as always:

 

[tomasjj]

I look forward to when he is irrelevant again.

 

[MomoWASright]

I look forward to when he is irrelevant again.

Trump, Dantes or Rosco?

 

[Hansern]

All of the above

 

[Athens]

All of the above

Are you suggesting that they're relevant now?

 

[the count]

I have to say, the arguments that @dantes have made to prove that he is correct, one hundred percent of the time is making me question whether Biden has in fact, won the US presidential election

 

[Hansern]

Are you suggesting that they're relevant now?

Good point! I take it back.

 

[Rosco]

Poor the Dantes.

I never thought I’d see him out-graphed.

But hang on.... let’s see what Ross can come up with.

Just more proof I'm afraid. You know the way politicians reward those that help them get elected ?

Department of Homeland Security: Ur Jaddou, a former chief counsel at USCIS and State Department alumna, will head up the DHS team.

Craig Fugate, a former Federal Emergency Management Agency administrator, Caitlin Durkovich, a former DHS assistant secretary for infrastructure protection, and Peter Neffenger, a former Transportation Security Administration leader and vice commandant for the Coast Guard, are also on the DHS team.

It's telling that they don't mention who Neffenger works for right now.

 

[dantes]

I have to say, the arguments that @dantes have made to prove that he is correct, one hundred percent of the time is making me question whether Biden has in fact, won the US presidential election

I think almost everyone knows mail in ballot fraud is how he won. When the media keep repeating there is no ethidence of fraud, you have to be pretty naive not to know there was fraud. That doesn't have much bearing on the court cases though, you can lose despite there being fraud, equally you can win them even if there was no fraud.

 

[dantes]

Just more proof I'm afraid. You know the way politicians reward those that help them get elected ?



It's telling that they don't mention who Neffenger works for right now.

Lol talk about zero fucks. Part of me hopes he gets inaugurated, a big part, just to watch the ensuing car crash as the woke fools fall further into poverty.

 

[Hansern]

 

[dantes]

Just more proof I'm afraid. You know the way politicians reward those that help them get elected ?



It's telling that they don't mention who Neffenger works for right now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_V._Neffenger&diff=988872125&oldid=988871895


aaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaahhahahaahahahahaha jesus fucking christ

 

[the count]

I think almost everyone knows mail in ballot fraud is how he won. When the media keep repeating there is no ethidence of fraud, you have to be pretty naive not to know there was fraud. That doesn't have much bearing on the court cases though, you can lose despite there being fraud, equally you can win them even if there was no fraud.

My point exactly.
If you keep repeating, "I've won, I've won I've won" there can be only one logical, reasonable conclusion.

 

[Woland]

I'm just glad my midlife crisis was a typical drugs and shagging thing and didn't involve falling for some lying fat mess on a different continent who would hate you if he knew you

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

hahaha!

 

[Dirty Sanchez]

@Rosco and @dantes are a fucking embarrassment - like Trump. But by all means keep wasting your time posting bollocks in here, I can imagine that keeping you cunts off the streets is a good thing.

 

[rubans]

Lol talk about zero fucks. Part of me hopes he gets inaugurated, a big part, just to watch the ensuing car crash as the woke fools fall further into poverty.

Even worse for those disingenuous Lawrence Fox wannabe racists pretending they want Trump for another 4 yrs because he’s gonna protect the common man, hold back China, lower taxes for the poor, give Britain a trade deal, bring back American Steel BS. It didn’t work for Brexit apologists and ain’t worked for Trump’s tenure.

 

[dantes]

@Rosco and @dantes are a fucking embarrassment - like Trump. But by all means keep wasting your time posting bollocks in here, I can imagine that keeping you cunts off the streets is a good thing.

That's not hard to imagine. Try to imagine yourself, your descendents for the next century, all of your ancestors for another century, all your distant relatives. Imagine that. And know they collectively will never ever match my intelligence. And that's just facts.

 

[dantes]

Then imagine what I must think as a person out of that pool of people tries to insult my intelligence.

 

[dantes]

Even worse for those disingenuous Lawrence Fox wannabe racists pretending they want Trump for another 4 yrs because he’s gonna protect the common man, hold back China, lower taxes for the poor, give Britain a trade deal, bring back American Steel BS. It didn’t work for Brexit apologists and ain’t worked for Trump’s tenure.

Approximately what percentage of the 73 million people do you put in that category?

 

[rubans]

Approximately what percentage of the 73 million people do you put in that category?

Well if you wanted to go by numbers then say around 70 million, the other 3 million were probably fraudulent votes by Giuliani and his team.

 

[Woland]

 

[dantes]

Well if you wanted to go by numbers then say around 70 million, the other 3 million were probably fraudulent votes by Giuliani and his team.

Hah and what is your actual estimate?

 

[rubans]

Hah and what is your actual estimate?

I will stick it in Tensorflow over some chinese Alibaba servers and get back to you but I would imagine it’s close to my current estimates.