• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

Forums Unread posts
dantes said:
The process of numerical addition. The news you've outsourced your thinking to is in this instance contrary to very basic numerical addition. I'm shocked, I never thought you were actually all this dumb.
Click to expand...
It's almost like you want to be part of QAnon.
 
Christ. Just stop, not even one day ago you were perfectly able to look at your wine bottles and count them up in different categories. For all that is good in this land, for once, just use that same skill that is there in your brain and apply it to the votes.
 
You needn't concern yourself in this, it involves counting which I have long since put past your list of capabilities.
 
List, a list might help.

(1) 100 ballots are cast.
(2) Biden gets 51
(3) By subtraction, Trump gets 49
(4) Trump says it was stolen
(5) Math people scrape the raw data off web servers, analyse it, find 10 votes appear to be fraudulent, this needs investigating, don't certify
(6) Woke people call it the big lie, Biden got 51, 2 more than trump, he won, deal with it, wah wah wah
(6) Math people try to explain that 10 > 2 which was the margin of victory
(7) Woke people froth at the mouth, scream about an insurrection, and cry more
(8) Monies are raised, used to pay for exclusive prostitutes for republicans, and also used to conduct an audit
(9) Math people subpoena and obtain the data off the voting machine servers (albeit they discover some was deleted the night before, but let's not go there)
(10) Math people shock horror discover that 10 votes in the data are in fact fraudulent, that Biden got 52 votes and Trump got 48, and that the election shouldn't have been certified
(11) News reports that Biden increased his margin of victory
(12) Unfathomably thick people on 6CM celebrate
(13) 10 - 4 = ? is just an absolute puzzle, never has such a hard problem as this been posited to mere human beings, who knows the answer?
(14) Woke people carry on frothing at the mouth about the big lie

None of this really matters, nobody could care less anymore since it's done and dusted. What matters is how you are unable to perform a basic addition and subtraction anymore. It's a shameful indictment of how dumb you are, I can't even imagine any alternative explanation other than you really are just that dumb.
 
StevieM said:
I’d love to get an understanding of the critical thought process that Ross applied to the Cyber Ninjas report into voting in Maricopa County.

Looks like he’s fallen for bullshit again.
Click to expand...

If Biden won by 10,000 votes, but there's evidence of 50,000 fraudulent votes I would have thought anyone with two braincells could see there's something to be concerned about.

But again if the media puts out a narrative , Stevie falls for it.

Good sheep.
 
dantes said:
The process of numerical addition. The news you've outsourced your thinking to is in this instance contrary to very basic numerical addition. I'm shocked, I never thought you were actually all this dumb.
Click to expand...

Talk to me about Cyber Ninja’s Dantes - are you confident in their ability to count?
 
Rosco said:
If Biden won by 10,000 votes, but there's evidence of 50,000 fraudulent votes I would have thought anyone with two braincells could see there's something to be concerned about.

But again if the media puts out a narrative , Stevie falls for it.

Good sheep.
Click to expand...

See Ross, you’re taking the Cyber Ninjas report as incontrovertible evidence.

Let’s apply some critical thinking.

Did you look at you prepared the report - what did you conclude about their motivations, who funded them, experience and background?

Did you look at all the claims in the report and the possible explanations as to what the data was actually showing?

Of course you didn’t.

I’m actually surprised the report didn’t have something more meatier to champion - but I guess it was going to do it’s job regardless of whatever’s in it.
 
You literally just took their exact same report as incontrovertible evidence that Biden increased his margin of victory, when the news told you to do so.

Now you want to assume and speculate up reasons for why you no longer believe in their counting abilities? Comedy. Clown comedy.
 
dantes said:
You literally just took their exact same report as incontrovertible evidence that Biden increased his margin of victory, when the news told you to do so.

Now you want to assume and speculate up reasons for why you no longer believe in their counting abilities? Comedy. Clown comedy.
Click to expand...

You’re overreaching.

I would take anything in that report with a pinch of salt - the comment about Biden’s vote increasing was out of pure amusement.

But you raise a valid point - which is the one I was trying to get you towards - you either think the report is reliable or you have misgivings about it and everything in it.

You’re always banging on about how “scientists” can’t be trusted because they’re chasing the monies and only present stats without doing any actual work.

So... are Cyber Ninjas likely to have produced a rigorous, impartial, sound report - or is it bollocks?
 
StevieM said:
You’re overreaching.

I would take anything in that report with a pinch of salt - the comment about Biden’s vote increasing was out of pure amusement.

But you raise a valid point - which is the one I was trying to get you towards - you either think the report is reliable or you have misgivings about it and everything in it.

You’re always banging on about how “scientists” can’t be trusted because they’re chasing the monies and only present stats without doing any actual work.

So... are Cyber Ninjas likely to have produced a rigorous, impartial, sound report - or is it bollocks?
Click to expand...

Scientists are analysing scientific data, such as trying to forecast a temperature change as a multiphase fluid flows down a length of pipe. There's all sorts of ways you can get it wrong because modelling nature is just hard, and there are all sorts of reasons to suspect 99% of academics would just not bother to spend sufficient time upon doing it right.

Cyber Ninjas counted things like "23,000 voters had moved out of state". This is counting, of things, using whole numbers, you don't even need fractions. I can't imagine a single plausible way you can fuck that up. You are the one who is reaching to think that there is some mysterious complexity in this dark art of counting which we're just not aware of, and which allows you to hold on to your laughable silly belief that the fraud was a big lie.
 
StevieM said:
You’re overreaching.

I would take anything in that report with a pinch of salt - the comment about Biden’s vote increasing was out of pure amusement.

But you raise a valid point - which is the one I was trying to get you towards - you either think the report is reliable or you have misgivings about it and everything in it.

You’re always banging on about how “scientists” can’t be trusted because they’re chasing the monies and only present stats without doing any actual work.

So... are Cyber Ninjas likely to have produced a rigorous, impartial, sound report - or is it bollocks?
Click to expand...
At this point they are both going to argue that Black is White.

May as well just accept it, they aren't going to listen to any evidence that doesn't support their way of thinking.

You're wasting your time.
 
9c9mw0jbkjp71.jpg
 
StevieM said:
You’re overreaching.

I would take anything in that report with a pinch of salt - the comment about Biden’s vote increasing was out of pure amusement.

But you raise a valid point - which is the one I was trying to get you towards - you either think the report is reliable or you have misgivings about it and everything in it.

You’re always banging on about how “scientists” can’t be trusted because they’re chasing the monies and only present stats without doing any actual work.

So... are Cyber Ninjas likely to have produced a rigorous, impartial, sound report - or is it bollocks?
Click to expand...

I think they've done a way better job than the media that influences you - who without any investigation whatsoever concluded there was no fraud.
 
The Nomad said:
At this point they are both going to argue that Black is White.

May as well just accept it, they aren't going to listen to any evidence that doesn't support their way of thinking.

You're wasting your time.
Click to expand...

Your evidence was a newspaper article that couldn't fathom that the vote tally they were referring to counted the fraudulent votes within the total, because that's how counting works, counting, of things. Do continue pretending whatever you like to yourself though.
 
Nomad: counts $5000 in $1 notes
Dantes: $500 of those look fraudulant to me
Nomad: counts to $5000 again, stop wasting my time! It's $5000, I counted, so there
Dantes: No really mate, it's only $4500, the rest is dodgy money
Nomad: Shut up you Q fool, you big baby, shud up wah wah
Dantes:
 
The duplicates thing is based on first name, last name, birth year and county. There are numerous John Smith's all the same age, and in different counties, so definitely not all of them are fraudulent. There's also nothing to say how many of them were Biden instead of Trump.
 
Gerry_A_Trick said:
The duplicates thing is based on first name, last name, birth year and county. There are numerous John Smith's all the same age, and in different counties, so definitely not all of them are fraudulent. There's also nothing to say how many of them were Biden instead of Trump.
Click to expand...

What’s wrong with that model?
It sounds like one of the fraud ML models I wrote for one of my banking clients, I have since left that place though 😉
 
rubans said:
What’s wrong with that model?
It’s like one of the fraud ML models I wrote for one of my banking clients, I have since left that place though 😉
Click to expand...

Nothing wrong with it, but it's just a suggestive flag to say it might be worth looking a little deeper, it doesn't mean 100% are fraudulent, and certainly not that 100% of them would mean extra votes for Trump.
 
dantes said:
Nomad: counts $5000 in $1 notes
Dantes: $500 of those look fraudulant to me
Nomad: counts to $5000 again, stop wasting my time! It's $5000, I counted, so there
Dantes: No really mate, it's only $4500, the rest is dodgy money
Nomad: Shut up you Q fool, you big baby, shud up wah wah
Dantes:
Click to expand...
The only ones wah wahing in this thread are yourself and Ross.

Personally I couldn't give a fuck. They are as bad as each other for different reasons.
 
Gerry_A_Trick said:
Nothing wrong with it, but it's just a suggestive flag to say it might be worth looking a little deeper, it doesn't mean 100% are fraudulent, and certainly not that 100% of them would mean extra votes for Trump.
Click to expand...

You seem to be missing the fact that it's now too late to look. The same numbers in the same county were determined last year from basically the same data. That would have been the time to check. Now all you can do is say oh, well fuck, it's possible those votes were all innocent mistakes and we have legal explanations for them all, or they would all cancel each other out over a season, yes, yeah I'm sure if we checked at the time that's what we'd have found. But we didn't you see, so shut up about it now, you have no ethidence wah wah. Which won't go down so well. I hear people on parler are discussing executions and hangings. You love to see it.
 
Gerry_A_Trick said:
It just means they speak a form of French in Haiti.
Click to expand...

Oh. How disappointing. I was in the process of constructing a fantasy involving hundreds of thousands of immigrants having arranged a spate of political assassinations, much like the one that happened in their motherland, then making the trip over in unison.
 
dantes said:
Oh. How disappointing. I was in the process of constructing a fantasy involving hundreds of thousands of immigrants having arranged a spate of political assassinations, much like the one that happened in their motherland, then making the trip over in unison.
Click to expand...

Google trends also tells you nothing about volumes, it's a relative trend. The highest volumes in the time period are 100, everything else is relative to that, essentially nobody is interested in it relative to January. The only volumes now are from people using it in French.
 
Gerry_A_Trick said:
Google trends also tells you nothing about volumes, it's a relative trend. The highest volumes in the time period are 100, everything else is relative to that, essentially nobody is interested in it relative to January. The only volumes now are from people using it in French.
Click to expand...

Perhaps Biden doesn't know this, thinks like me that the Haiti immigrants were a bunch of right wing maga supporters, and that's why he's shipping them off to guantanamo. Poor bastards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brizzle
    • Like
  • Locked
Pre Match Pre Match - Man Utd (H) - Sun 16:30
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Replies
316
Views
5K
My_Blood_Bleeds_Red
My_Blood_Bleeds_Red
Woland
    • Like
    • Haha
    • Love
Things we were very wrong about in 2024
2 3 4
Replies
96
Views
2K
Judge Jules
Judge Jules
Brizzle
    • Like
Pre Match Pre Match - Everton (A) - Sat 12:30
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
157
Views
4K
Dirty Sanchez
Dirty Sanchez
Whaddapie
    • Like
    • Happy
Happy Everything, lads...
2
Replies
32
Views
831
binomial
binomial
moron
    • Like
Finding the Next VVD.....
2
Replies
52
Views
759
Squiggles
Squiggles
Back
Top Bottom