There was a world before the US, and it was not good for people who didn't own assets, and without Trump you're facing a new world without the US.
If your hyperbole is referring to the waning power of the US, that's happening Trump or no Trump.
There was a world before the US, and it was not good for people who didn't own assets, and without Trump you're facing a new world without the US.
The ideal solution would be to divide the country. Then the north can install a proper socialist like Sanders and see how it works out for them, because that is their view. The south can install a proper capitalist like Trump/Ivanka, and see how that works out. A republican or a democrat president speaks to neither side with their policies, they only say the right things to appeal to that side then proceed to enrich themselves usually with globalist policies that have bled the country dry and are the root cause of people drifting to extreme political views.
If your hyperbole is referring to the waning power of the US, that's happening Trump or no Trump.
Unfortunately that isn't a solution because America is divided right across the country. In most states, more than 45% backed the losing party.
Socialists tend to do better in cities, and capitalists in rural / suburban places. Because depending on how you make your livelihood, one tends to make more sense than the other. You can't run away from the fact that both sides have equally valid points, and policies have to be based on compromise and imperfection.
Although huge numbers of farmers in the states are reliant on subsidies from the government, and this is usually in the midwest where they vote republican. They all depend on the money to grow corn, which is then turned into the corn syrup which they add to everything.Unfortunately that isn't a solution because America is divided right across the country. In most states, more than 45% backed the losing party.
Socialists tend to do better in cities, and capitalists in rural / suburban places. Because depending on how you make your livelihood, one tends to make more sense than the other. You can't run away from the fact that both sides have equally valid points, and policies have to be based on compromise and imperfection.
Their user base/hits will collapse. Investors value them using their user base. Shorting facebook will be the easiest trade of 2021.
Nah. That base has long migrated to Parler. He has nothing to lose by turning coat now.
Fwiw I think he's cashing out of fb and investing in the next big platform anyway
Unfortunately that isn't a solution because America is divided right across the country. In most states, more than 45% backed the losing party.
Socialists tend to do better in cities, and capitalists in rural / suburban places. Because depending on how you make your livelihood, one tends to make more sense than the other. You can't run away from the fact that both sides have equally valid points, and policies have to be based on compromise and imperfection.
What is your thinking behind this? I wonder whether now that Biden is in and has control of both the Senate & the house there is fear about new gun legislations and people are stocking up?
I'm buying guns. No Glock down in lockdown baby
They're not angry enough
Yes, that'll go down well with millions of people, as well as failing to work, as well as achieving nothing if it were even possible to get done.
It's perfectly possible.
And after yesterday, nobody gives a fuck what the MAGA wackadoodles think.
It would genuinely be interesting to see how many of those who voted in support of Trump would do so again after the past couple of months and yesterday in particular, his popularity must be shrinking by the day
With moderate Republicans maybe.. but are there any moderates left?It would genuinely be interesting to see how many of those who voted in support of Trump would do so again after the past couple of months and yesterday in particular, his popularity must be shrinking by the day
With moderate Republicans maybe.. but are there any moderates left?