Benteke v Sturridge last 3 seasons from premier league website
Goals: 42 (inc 8 penalties from 190 shots 0.47 goals per match v 35 (inc 1 penalty) from 170 shots 0.64 goals per match
Assists: 8 v 11
Crosses:26 v 41
Headers: 13 v 5
Right Foot; 22 v 7
Left Foot: 7 v 22
Of those scored
Six yard box:10% v 28%
RHS penalty box: 5% v 11%
LHS penalty box: 5% v 9%
Centre of penalty box: 55% v 34%
Outside box:12% v 15%
This implies Benteke is very similar to Sturridge and not a one trick pony
You're just looking at goals scored, not shot attempts though. Goals are the results of attempts (duh), but two guys with different playing styles and efficiency rates can yield the comparisons above, (probably incorrectly) suggesting similarity in styles.
Here's a comparison of shot attempts for the last 3 seasons, penalties factored out (source: whoscored).
STURRIDGE BENTEKE
Season Head Feet Head Feet
14/15 4 34 27 52
13/14 10 86 28 35
12/13 4 56 34 67
What does that say now? It says that headed attempts made up
6% to 10% of Sturridge's shots in each season but
34% to 44% of Benteke's attempts. Unfortunately, there aren't better breakdowns available to me so I don't know how many of those headers came from setpieces - a large number of those in that category would've inflated the composition in Benteke's case. However, if we assume that half of those headed attempts came from corners / free kicks, then, you'd still end up with anything from 20% to 28% of Benteke's attempts coming from crosses. Still not that similar.
What's also dissimilar, is the composition of attempts inside vs outside the boxes (both 6 and 18-yards). Shot attempts inside the box, minus penalties, assuming all headers inside box:
STURRIDGE BENTEKE BALOTELLI
Season INBOX OUTBOX INBOX OUTBOX INBOX OUTBOX
14/15 25 14 68 11 25 31
13/14 63 35 51 12 52 95
12/13 40 20 78 23 20 51
p.s. You'll find that the total number of shots don't always exactly tally with the first table - that's because there's this category of shots for attempts going in from body parts called "Others" which I ignore. Miniscule numbers anyway, so no harm done dropping them.
I threw in Balotelli there for kicks, just to show why he was such a bad fit for us. I don't know of any other striker who takes so much more outside box shots than inside box ones. He's had to change his game with us, as you can see from his numbers in 14/15 versus the other two seasons.
Anyway, back on Benteke vs Sturridge, you can see that at least Benteke lives inside the box, which is a good thing for us. The question now is, again, can he deal with a game that's built on fewer aerial crosses, or can we (or do we want to) build a game that's better at putting in aerial crosses.
When it comes to
converting inside the box with feet, there's no compare - Sturridge's efficiency, last season aside, is much better.
STURRIDGE BENTEKE
Season Efficiency Efficiency
14/15 14.3% 14.6%
13/14 24.5% 13.0%
12/13 22.2% 20.5%
The thing is though, that efficiency rates are dependent on not just the quality of the player, but also the quality of the chances provided. If you believe Benteke will get more and much better opportunities to his feet after joining us, then you might expect to see those conversion rates go up. That's what happened to Sturridge by the way - prior to joining us, he was shooting at the same rates as Benteke was in the last 2 seasons.
Stat bomb!