Anfields new race shame...

[monsieurdantes]

[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473603#msg1473603 date=1327923134]
It's "intact," you illiterate fool.
[/quote]

the comma should come afterwards, you grammatically ignorant idiot

 

[Farkmaster]

For people getting fucked at will, you're a pretty miserable bunch really.

 

[Farkmaster]

Of all the injustice in the world to eat away at your brain, you've made a really great selection with the FA's kangaroo court. Other injustices would have larger appetites.

 

[monsieurdantes]

I can handle the other injustices in the world by proxy. As in if they came into my vicinity then I would also obliterate them. So in my brain I can live with that, it's no fault of my own those injustices never came within striking distance of dantes. In your brain you can't say the same. Once you give in to one injustice, then it is in your nature to give in to them all. Pretending otherwise is just dellusion.

 

[kingjulian]

I think it's time for Dantes to shut up on this subject. We are going in circles and i say that only after reading a couple of posts here and there on this thread. I can't be arsed to read the rest of it...

 

[My_Blood_Bleeds_Red]

quite clearly, dantes is a WUM.

yet why some here find him endearing and 'interesting', and give him the time of the day...baffles the heck out of me. For every controversial thing he says, and many which are downright nasty, tasteless and offensive, his head becomes bigger. He clearly thrives on the attention given to him - all traits of a WUM.

all he does is talk trash and beneath all that intellectual mask he puts on, if you pause and think carefully about it...it's all gibberish that comes out really. Nothing he speaks makes any sense. It's all about how great his mind is, which we all know isn't true.

tbf, he's no different than glock. except slightly more intelligent, more psychotic and a whole lot weirder.

 

[Red Astaire]

[quote author=kingjulian link=topic=48473.msg1473616#msg1473616 date=1327925340]
I think it's time for Dantes to shut up on this subject. We are going in circles and i say that only after reading a couple of posts here and there on this thread. I can't be arsed to read the rest of it...
[/quote]

Yep agree with this. Also I have to say I find him quite tedious and probably even worse for him.... Boring.

 

[nealmac]

What exactly did that prick Richard Keys say?

 

[monsieurdantes]

This is depressing. Yesterday, yesterday after my first post in this thread is when you get to call me a wind up merchant.

Today after a dozen more posts where I have patiently tried to explain the nature of revenge, what kind of things motivate someone who is out for revenge, thre reason they stoop to such abhorrent lows. Then you don't get to pretend anymore that it's a wind up meant to get attention. In fact, it is me not taking it personally when people are thinking I'm racist or condoning the racist, and simply trying to help them understand something about revenge. The same way I help them understand physics.

Are you going to patiently back up and explain the things you've just claimed about me? Nope, you just post shit then bugger off like you did in the physics thread. go ahead and tell me whats gibberish. im listening.

 

[Insignificance]

As I see your point regarding revenge I just cant agree with the concept of your posts. Revenge should be classy and stylish. It should hurt Evra. Making some stupid monkeysounds is not classy, not stylish and I cant believe it is capable of hurting anyone but the monkey itself...

This revenge can only come in one package. The 11th feb Little Luis will have to tear Evra a new arsehole and make him a laughing stock... And I feel quite confident he will do that. I miss the little bugger and cant wait to see him take on Evra that day.

revenge is to stuff the fucking chewing gum down Fergies throat. Luis will do that as well... Fergie was dead scared of him when they came to Anfield in November. I am sure Fergie allready has an eye on the next weekend...

There is allways a time and a place for revenge, but racial abuse is no revenge.

 

[monsieurdantes]

This is what I'm trying to discuss in my tedious and boring posts. I would not make racist chants to get revenge, ever. But someone else who I don't give a shit about if he makes those chants then he gets fucked over, and at the same time Evra gets fucked over, then I get revenge. The cardigan twat didn't get revenge, he just got fucked over like he deserved. It is ME who got the revenge in this situation.

You see a contradiction there when I can extract satisfaction from something I would never do myself and know to be wrong. And it's interesting to think about how and why that same contradiction doesn't exist in my mind. But hey, I'm just winding you up cos life isn't complicated or intricate, it's simple, peoples reactions are all simple one-to-one correlations. Evra lied. It's wrong to react by being racist. End of story. No other possibilities we need to consider here. Dantes should shut the fuck up on this topic and let everyone move on...

 

[Insignificance]

I disagree with you. There is no way you got any revenge on Evra. He wouldnt be hurt by the cardigan monkey. Come on. He didnt get hurt by anything Luis said either so why the hell would he get hurt by the lunatic? He lied as you said, and there is a matter to be settled between them, but it has got nothing to do with monkey sounds. Those just gained more sympathy for Evra and build up under his case. He will shortly start feeling justice was done to Lusi if there is more monkeys around.

 

[monsieurdantes]

Well, I explained why I believed he would be hurt. And my beliefs are sufficient for me to feel satisfied for the time being. It is possible you are right though, but that doesn't affect me until there is some more information to suggest it actually is the case. Then I would lose my satisfaction and think of other options for revenge.

I don't objectively care about whether or not Evra was hurt. I only care that I believe he has been hurt so that I can rest easy again. Maybe there's a better word for that then revenge. It's exactly the same when you call lucas a cunt in the match thread. It doesn't objectively hurt him for playing like a cunt, but the fact you said it and put your mind at rest is comforting and revenge enough for his performance.

 

[gkmacca]

[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48473.msg1473605#msg1473605 date=1327923374]
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473603#msg1473603 date=1327923134]
It's "intact," you illiterate fool.
[/quote]

the comma should come afterwards, you grammatically ignorant idiot
[/quote]

I write professionally, you idiot, and I can assure you that's the correct style. Maybe not for you when you scrawl on a wall, but for professionals it is.

 

[Gerry_A_Trick]

[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473703#msg1473703 date=1327936873]
[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48473.msg1473605#msg1473605 date=1327923374]
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473603#msg1473603 date=1327923134]
It's "intact," you illiterate fool.
[/quote]

the comma should come afterwards, you grammatically ignorant idiot
[/quote]

I write professionally, you idiot, and I can assure you that's the correct style. Maybe not for you when you scrawl on a wall, but for professionals it is.
[/quote]

Is it? Honestly would have thought it should come after the quotation mark.

You learn something new every day on SCM...

 

[Wizardry]

[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473703#msg1473703 date=1327936873]
[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48473.msg1473605#msg1473605 date=1327923374]
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473603#msg1473603 date=1327923134]
It's "intact," you illiterate fool.
[/quote]

the comma should come afterwards, you grammatically ignorant idiot
[/quote]

I write professionally, you idiot, and I can assure you that's the correct style. Maybe not for you when you scrawl on a wall, but for professionals it is.
[/quote]

That first part was beneath you, Macca.

Not sure why someone as transparently pretentious was able to provoke such a reaction from you.

 

[doctor_mac]

[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=48473.msg1473706#msg1473706 date=1327937128]
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473703#msg1473703 date=1327936873]
[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48473.msg1473605#msg1473605 date=1327923374]
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473603#msg1473603 date=1327923134]
It's "intact," you illiterate fool.
[/quote]

the comma should come afterwards, you grammatically ignorant idiot
[/quote]

I write professionally, you idiot, and I can assure you that's the correct style. Maybe not for you when you scrawl on a wall, but for professionals it is.
[/quote]

Is it? Honestly would have thought it should come after the quotation mark.

You learn something new every day on SCM...
[/quote]

To be fair, there is no definitive right way– it depends on the style guide used by the publisher you are writing for. Certainly in academic publishing there is no fixed universal system, though it would be more common to have the comma after the quoted text.

 

[gkmacca]

Well, if I'm writing a book and did that the copy editor would change it. I've written quite a few - unlike, I suspect, this tiresome twat. If a PhD student did it and I was examining it I'd ask them to change it.

 

[My_Blood_Bleeds_Red]

From race to punctuation marks.

Brilliant.

 

[monsieurdantes]

[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473713#msg1473713 date=1327938081]
Well, if I'm writing a book and did that the copy editor would change it. I've written quite a few - unlike, I suspect, this tiresome twat. If a PhD student did it and I was examining it I'd ask them to change it.
[/quote]

Is this because you are writing for american readers...

Now, keep in mind that this comma and period inside the quotation marks business is strictly American usage. The British don't do it that way. They are inclined to place commas and periods logically rather than conventionally, depending on whether the punctuation belongs to the quotation or to the sentence that contains the quotation, just as we do with question marks and exclamation points.

 

[Rosco]

I have to agree with Dantes on one thing, he's not a WUM.

He's just a massive fuckwit.

 

[doctor_mac]

[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48473.msg1473713#msg1473713 date=1327938081]
Well, if I'm writing a book and did that the copy editor would change it. I've written quite a few - unlike, I suspect, this tiresome twat. If a PhD student did it and I was examining it I'd ask them to change it.
[/quote]

Most of my published work has gone through houses whose style guide is based upon the same system (MHRA), and they're of the punctuation outside of the quotation school.

 

[monsieurdantes]

I had a greek examiner, who spent three hours trying to find fault with the mathematics. He was visibly tired at the end, but I was still fresh as a daisy having fun evading, slipping, and blocking every one of his knock-out punches. It was like ali foreman. Come at me bro lol

Then finally, he was reduced to landing petty grammatical body shots such as correcting my usage of homogenous / homogeneous. Because strictly speaking, they are two different concepts etc. etc. I struggled to keep a straight face... like what happened to the great greek mathematician?

 

[monsieurdantes]

[quote author=Rosco link=topic=48473.msg1473718#msg1473718 date=1327938878]
I have to agree with Dantes on one thing, he's not a WUM.

He's just a massive fuckwit.
[/quote]

I will also take those personal insults on the chin most of the time. Someone who is a fuckwit however, he would go bump the other suarez thread where you made that incorrect legal interpretation of the meaning of "subjective", despite claming to know what you were talking about for the previous 175 pages. Just sayin

 

[Insignificance]

[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48473.msg1473724#msg1473724 date=1327939987]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=48473.msg1473718#msg1473718 date=1327938878]
I have to agree with Dantes on one thing, he's not a WUM.

He's just a massive fuckwit.
[/quote]

I will also take those personal insults on the chin most of the time. Someone who is a fuckwit however, he would go bump the other suarez thread where you made that incorrect legal interpretation of the meaning of "subjective", despite claming to know what you were talking about for the previous 175 pages. Just sayin
[/quote]

So you had enough revenge from the monkey who abused Evra that you dont need revenge when someone abuses you?

 

[Red Astaire]

[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48473.msg1473723#msg1473723 date=1327939167]
I had a greek examiner, who spent three hours trying to find fault with the mathematics. He was visibly tired at the end, but I was still fresh as a daisy having fun evading, slipping, and blocking every one of his knock-out punches. It was like ali foreman. Come at me bro lol

Then finally, he was reduced to landing petty grammatical body shots such as correcting my usage of homogenous / homogeneous. Because strictly speaking, they are two different concepts etc. etc. I struggled to keep a straight face... like what happened to the great greek mathematician?
[/quote]

Good grief - Your buffoonery knows no bounds...

 

[monsieurdantes]

[quote author=Insignificance link=topic=48473.msg1473729#msg1473729 date=1327940094]
[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48473.msg1473724#msg1473724 date=1327939987]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=48473.msg1473718#msg1473718 date=1327938878]
I have to agree with Dantes on one thing, he's not a WUM.

He's just a massive fuckwit.
[/quote]

I will also take those personal insults on the chin most of the time. Someone who is a fuckwit however, he would go bump the other suarez thread where you made that incorrect legal interpretation of the meaning of "subjective", despite claming to know what you were talking about for the previous 175 pages. Just sayin
[/quote]

So you had enough revenge from the monkey who abused Evra that you dont need revenge when someone abuses you?
[/quote]

I do need revenge, but I have a gerater need to continue the argument. So when Rosco or Macca insult me, it just committs them further into the argument and forces them to have to step it up. Raises the quality, and makes it more interesting. Like just now, who knew about the grammar? Like last month, who knew about strict liability and appeal hearings and the FA regulations and processes?

If there were no personal insults, then we both know absolutely nobody on this forum would have bothered to pull their finger out and analyse things so carefully. We'd all just sit there on the random picture thread laughing. So it's a good trade-off.

 

[monsieurdantes]

[quote author=Red Astaire link=topic=48473.msg1473734#msg1473734 date=1327940577]
[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48473.msg1473723#msg1473723 date=1327939167]
I had a greek examiner, who spent three hours trying to find fault with the mathematics. He was visibly tired at the end, but I was still fresh as a daisy having fun evading, slipping, and blocking every one of his knock-out punches. It was like ali foreman. Come at me bro lol

Then finally, he was reduced to landing petty grammatical body shots such as correcting my usage of homogenous / homogeneous. Because strictly speaking, they are two different concepts etc. etc. I struggled to keep a straight face... like what happened to the great greek mathematician?
[/quote]

Good grief - Your buffoonery knows no bounds...
[/quote]

Macca mentioned correcting the grammar of PhD students, I was just putting that attempted insult into perspective.

 

[kingjulian]

Dantes sounds like a well read person. He has his opinions, but some of the comments on here calling him illiterate/idiot etc are uncalled for...

To be fair, Dantes made that rod for his own back. Give it a rest mate, you don't have to post a reply to every post made in this thread. Some may not even be addressed to you. It's all fun when it happens in GC....but over here, even to someone who agrees with some of your view points, it becomes unbearable.

 

[Rosco]

[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48473.msg1473724#msg1473724 date=1327939987]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=48473.msg1473718#msg1473718 date=1327938878]
I have to agree with Dantes on one thing, he's not a WUM.

He's just a massive fuckwit.
[/quote]

I will also take those personal insults on the chin most of the time. Someone who is a fuckwit however, he would go bump the other suarez thread where you made that incorrect legal interpretation of the meaning of "subjective", despite claming to know what you were talking about for the previous 175 pages. Just sayin
[/quote]

In fact the FA commission were looking at it a bit strangely, what I said was still correct. And if you want to go back to the beginning of it, not many bothered to look at the situation clearly at all.

Your tremendous legal knowledge would have thrown the club into the High Court to take on the FA for defamation, despite nothing defamatory being said by the FA and nothing defamatory being said about the club. But that's because you don't have a clue about law, it's easy to regurgitate shit off the internet but when you have to put it into context it becomes transparent that you don't know a whole lot.

That you earlier in this thread equated reporting racist abuse to abusing children says a lot about you.