• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Poll Ole at the wheel choice...

Prefix for Poll Threads

Which do you prefer?

  • Smash the scum, Ole sacked.

    Votes: 6 9.4%
  • Smash the scum, Ole stays.

    Votes: 58 90.6%

  • Total voters
    64
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pressing, changing mindsets and discipline: How Ranieri engineered Watford’s victory over Manchester United
GettyImages-1354454930-1024x682.jpg

By Adam Leventhal Nov 22, 2021
comment-icon.png
11
save-icon.png

Both Ole Gunnar Solskjaer and Claudio Ranieri said similar things about the usefulness of the international break prior to Watford 4 Manchester United 1.
“This week has been a good week, we’ve had a chance to work with everyone on quite a few things,” said the Norwegian, while the Italian insisted, “I’m very confident that we will see the results of the hard work the players have been putting in on the training pitches over these weeks since we’ve been away.”
Only one team walked the walk after the pre-match talk.
The focus for many will be that in the final throes of Solskjaer’s reign, United were the architects of their own demise, but Watford’s actions helped choreograph the dramatic downfall.
Although nine players were away with their national teams after Watford’s 1-0 defeat at Arsenal. Ranieri’s focus was to build on the positives. “He tried tapping into the psychology,” Tom Cleverley tells The Athletic. “At Arsenal, we got into areas and didn’t put the ball into the box so he tried to put a positive energy about the place (during the international break) and it showed.”
Coupled with working on the squad’s mindset, was the tactical plan. The majority of the detailed work had to be done in the last few days when everyone was back together but the emphasis throughout the domestic hiatus was on pressing.
Watford wanted to put pressure on United higher up the pitch but players were offered much more guidance from the coaching staff on the how and when. “Like with any Italian coach I’ve had, it’s very structured, it’s very black and white with and without the ball and more the basics of football,” said Cleverley.
It meant triggers were set in stone and if United players were isolated around their penalty box Watford hunted in packs. The weight of yellow traffic around Bruno Fernandes rushed him into a sliced clearance which led to the penalty incident in the opening 10 minutes and set the tone.
Seven players were near to Bruno Fernandes early in the first half which led to Josh King being fouled for the penalty.
bodies-MUFC.jpg

Man of the match Cleverley knew Harry Maguire may dawdle on the ball – as he did on 69 minutes – so he reacted quickly and decisively and, in one motion, stole the ball as the United captain lunged, fouled and was sent off. Pivotally, there was an organised safety net of players backing Cleverley up.
back-up-MUFC.png

The pressing movement was joined-up from front to back.
“The spaces in between the units (defence, midfield and attack) are now more balanced and compact rather than so open and disorganised (that had been seen earlier in the season),” said a club insider. It was disciplined training coming to life on matchday, one of the key elements Gino Pozzo wants.
“Every day the quality at the (training ground) in terms of work is high and detailed,” said a source close to the squad who praised the work that Ranieri had done on improving the “self-esteem and belief” shown against United.
“For me and my staff to bring the experience of working at many clubs to Watford is important,” said Ranieri.
“What we have learned about players, can make very positive changes by following my philosophy.” Cleverley concurs: “With his CV, as a player if he says something you listen and you try and implement it.”
Another tenet of Ranieri’s philosophy that the squad continued to work on was moving the ball forward more efficiently and ensuring players work hard to run into space to open up opportunities with overlaps. Joao Pedro and Emmanuel Dennis’s goals were evidence of a determination to not only demand the ball but get to it first. “We have the ability, it’s now the application, and the coach is providing that,” said a source familiar with how the club have been preparing for games. “We can hurt teams if we just concentrate and press.”
Personnel and formation changes also contributed to the success. Joshua King’s switch to the left of the front three allowed Emmanuel Dennis to operate down the centre with great effect and the pair rotated well. The move leant on Ranieri’s previous experience in the Premier League.
“King played a lot of matches on the left at Bournemouth and I wanted to put the defensive line under pressure because Dennis is very fast and it worked very well, but all of the team worked very well,” said the head coach.
With Juraj Kucka suspended and Ozan Tufan returning from Turkey with a knock, Ranieri changed the dynamic in midfield too with Imran Louza introduced as a bona fide deeper-lying midfielder and Cleverley alongside captain Moussa Sissoko as an energetic second piston, working up and down.
Louza was always available and put in a composed performance, helping to set the tempo and showed creativity. There were long, elevated passes but his most impressive was one threaded through the eye of the needle to Joshua King that almost saw him double the lead, and his tally, on 38 minutes. “It’s not easy to come and play your first match with a new manager against Manchester United,” said Ranieri of the Moroccan.
“(It) takes time with a new head coach but it (clearly) looks like they are working on things,” another source close to one of the players explained. “They looked organised and tactically aware going forward. Defensively leaking too easily but they have a proper plan.”
At the start of the second half when Watford dropped off United were able to build momentum and score their goal, which is a sign that work still needs to be done with the business end of a tricky run incoming (Leicester, Chelsea and Man City).
“Now we have to stay calm and continue to train very well, I want consistency. The results are important (in the coming games) but I want to see the same mentality,” said Ranieri, who also had Ben Foster to thank for an impressive one-on-one save from Cristiano Ronaldo at 2-1, and also an assist for the final goal.
Injuries to Ismaila Sarr – who redeemed himself with an impressive second after a double penalty miss – and Nicholas Nkoulou were the only concerning aspects of a day for Watford fans to cherish. They head into their next encounter feeling good about who is in charge, as United plot a different path.
 
Who should be the next manager of Manchester United?
Andy Mitten Nov 22, 2021
comment-icon.png
286
save-icon.png

Who should Manchester United employ next? In the poll of 4,000 United fans conducted by The Athletic recently, the question was asked: If Ole Gunnar Solskjaer was to go, what type of manager would you prefer: a long-term builder, even if it meant waiting longer for success, or someone experienced who could win things quickly?
The club tried what they hoped would be the Sir Alex Ferguson clone when they appointed David Moyes as his fellow Scot’s immediate successor in 2013. That didn’t work out and he lasted 10 months of a six-year contract. They then went for the tried and tested Dutch philosopher in Louis van Gaal, a man with trophy-winning experience at huge clubs. The fans were turned off by the dull football and he lasted two seasons. Next came Jose Mourinho, a man seen as a guarantor of success and one whose appointment had an 85 per cent approval rating from fans.
Mourinho won the Community Shield, League Cup and Europa League in his first season. But by his second, fans were moaning about the turgid style of play and the lack of a title challenge, despite United finishing second in the league. He lasted four months into his third season before being sacked – and he accepted he should have been sacked.
And then came Solskjaer, who’d had his card marked a couple of weeks before replacing Mourinho in December 2018.
There has been no card-marking this time. United were unprepared to replace a man they gave a new three-year contract to only four months ago.
GettyImages-1234763459.jpg


Mauricio Pochettino has long been linked with Manchester United but is currently in charge at Paris Saint-Germain (Photo: Bertrand Guay/AFP via Getty Images)
So what type of manager now, then?
There are pros and cons to the two approaches. Fans like to consider themselves patient and the ones at United generally are, as every recent manager will attest. But the current squad of players should be doing far more on the pitch than they have been recently.
United maintain that Solskjaer has left the club in a far better place than when he started and that his successor will have strong foundations to build on. If that’s so, then bring in a manager who can finish off the top, who can put the roof on the house that Solskjaer built rather than coming in, as every post-Ferguson manager has done, saying he needs at least six new players. Thomas Tuchel’s tweaks at Chelsea after joining midway through last season have shown this can work, but United seem so far off the top right now.
United also maintain that the club’s football structure is much stronger now than three years ago, following the restructuring of the recruitment department and strengthening of the academy, the appointments of John Murtough as football director and Darren Fletcher as technical director. The Moyesian “seven-year rebuilding” plan or the Van Gaal fire-sale of players which left United short in particular positions would not be necessary. The club hope this will minimise the disruption during the transition.
If Fletcher and Murtough do have sufficient power on the football side, then this could be true but are they making the ultimate, important decisions?
United have looked short of identity this season but the club like to think there is one, and so do the fans: fast, attacking football, using a mixture of homegrown players supplemented by bought-in stars. Their greatest teams have been built using this combination — Roy Keane and Paul Ince were bought in to play alongside Ryan Giggs and Paul Scholes.
The youth system continues to produce — Mason Greenwood and Marcus Rashford prove it — but it’s improbable that any top club will bring through a crop of several first-teamers around the same time. Solskjaer has given debuts to 16 academy graduates, more than Mourinho, Van Gaal and Moyes combined, but how many of those will become regulars? One? Two?
Ferguson tried the youth route and his own short-lived Fergie’s Fledglings in 1989, then reverted to big-money signings after three years in charge. They, in turn, took more time to settle. What could be more unsettled than United right now?
That Newcastle United game in September with Cristiano Ronaldo returning seems so long ago right now. Poor results meant support for Solskjaer among the match-going core waned, though he continued to have his name sung at matches. The sentence, “I love Ole, but…” became the norm. They didn’t think he was the right man anymore. After 12 league games, United have a negative goal difference and have conceded more goals than third-bottom Burnley.
Several agents had got in touch with the club following the downturn in results to put their clients forward as candidates for the job. All received similar responses: “Thanks. We’re sticking with Ole for now, but results must change.” At Watford on Saturday, recent results didn’t change. United have lost seven of their last 13 games — relegation form for a club whose business model is built on Champions League football.
The mood on United’s flight from London back to Manchester on Saturday night was as bad as you might imagine. The players were back in training on Sunday morning and now fly to Villarreal today (Monday) for a crucial Champions League match on Tuesday, then back to Manchester, then down to London again next weekend for a daunting Sunday match at Chelsea. These are huge games and United won’t have their best two central defenders as Raphael Varane is still injured and Harry Maguire’s red card at Watford means he won’t play at Stamford Bridge.
Michael Carrick will lead the coaching as a caretaker manager until an interim replacement is appointed to the end of the season. After that will come a permanent successor.
It’s an odd way of doing things, but Carrick needs to do exactly what Solskjaer did in 2018 and pick the mood up off the floor. Watching United for Solskjaer’s first four months was superb, then the dips started.
Unless United are absolutely certain who they’re going to appoint at the end of the season, as they were with Mourinho in 2016, it’s a challenge to try to hire two managers in a few months and could be reduced to the level of a soap opera with a new name touted every few days – though would United even mind that, as long as they stay at the forefront of the news?
GettyImages-1235593408.jpg


Ralf Rangnick could be an option for the interim job (Photo: Sven Hoppe/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Ronaldo, whose return after 12 years with Real Madrid and Juventus was dropped on unsuspecting staff in August, will also mean attention is never far away.
He tried to rally the squad last week before the Watford trip, having strong words with his failing team-mates. Not emotional words, but measured ones about focus and unity and taking responsibility themselves rather than pointing the blame. His Portuguese compatriot Bruno Fernandes tried to reason with fans at Vicarage Road and suggest the responsibility was on the players rather than just the manager. It’s easier to sack one man rather than a whole team of underperformers, though.
Dealing with Ronaldo and other huge-name players will be a challenge for whoever comes in. Carrick knows him having played with him, as did Fletcher, who was instructing Ronaldo from the bench on Saturday. Mike Phelan, the man who suggested that United buy N’Golo Kante and Callum Hudson-Odoi when Frank Lampard seemed unsure of them after Chelsea lost 4-0 to Solskjaer’s United in his first game as the Londoners’ manager in August 2019, will advise and support.
Kieran McKenna is said to be a bright and innovative coach, the man who leads the training sessions, but he doesn’t yet carry the same weight of authority with the players. The eventual interim manager must be a results person, since United need to be in next season’s Champions League. But who would take that job, knowing that they’re only going to be in charge for six months or so, looking after a team which isn’t their own?
United want someone to restore the forward momentum the squad had until two months ago and may wish they’d appointed now new Tottenham Hotspur head coach Antonio Conte, though there were reservations in the club about the recently-available Italian.
So, who could be that interim man?
It might be perfect for Ralf Rangnick, the 63-year-old German who has influenced many younger coaches, was so successful at RB Leipzig and helped form the concept of gegenpressing. Would Ronaldo even feature in such a United team? Would Rangnick leave a few months into a three-year contract on the sports development side at Lokomotiv Moscow? He would surely have to be offered a role at United beyond this season.
Lucien Favre is another out-of-work veteran who made his name in Germany and last coached at Borussia Dortmund, who sacked him last December.
Laurent Blanc, 56, is hugely experienced and now coaching in Qatar after four years away from management following his three years at PSG and two years with the French national team. Blanc spent two years playing for United two decades ago, so he knows the club but would probably cost a fair bit to get out of his current role and sources say he’d want more than an interim position to come.
Ernesto Valverde did a superb job in Spain, especially with Athletic Bilbao. He also won three titles with Greece’s Olympiakos and two with Barcelona before being sacked last year.
Rudi Garcia, 57, coached the Lyon team who knocked out Manchester City of the Champions League the season before last, and helped develop Memphis Depay and the French club’s incredible young midfield. Available having left Lyon at the end of last season, his teams play attacking football. Lille won their first-ever double under him and he brought through Eden Hazard, then he took Roma to successive runners-up finishes in Serie A. Garcia is a fighter with a good track record of doing well at teams who aren’t — Lyon were 14th when he took charge, and he took them to a French Cup final and a Champions League semi-final, knocking out Juventus and City along the way.
The Athletic also understands former United captain Steve Bruce, recently let go by Newcastle, would be very keen on the role, and believes he could help stabilise the dressing room.
The names of Erik ten Hag, Mauricio Pochettino, Zinedine Zidane and Brendan Rodgers keep coming up for the more permanent position. They’re the men of the moment, just as Sven-Goran Eriksson was in 2002 when he’d agreed to replace Ferguson. Ten Hag is not keen to leave mid-season and would have a small release clause in the summer; Pochettino is open to a return to the Premier League; Zidane is an incredibly unlikely option; and Rodgers would perhaps be prohibitively expensive.
Who else? Luis Enrique did a superb job at Barcelona and is doing well managing Spain’s national team, where he replaced Julen Lopetegui, whose Sevilla side beat Solskjaer’s United 2-1 in a pandemic-enforced one-off 2019-20 Europa League semi-final.
United know that getting top managers to leave jobs at mid-season is very difficult, but football changes fast. Ajax’s Ten Hag, perhaps the most coveted of those mentioned, was close to losing his job in March 2019, accused of being a poor communicator by fans and the media. Then he took his young side to the Bernabeu and battered Europe’s pre-eminent team, Real Madrid, 4-1 to win a Champions League last-16 tie. He’s not looked back.
GettyImages-1312186682.jpg


Julen Lopetegui is under contract at Sevilla (Photo: Jose Manuel Alvarez/Quality Sport Images/Getty Images)
Just writing all this seems so half-hearted, so ill-prepared and scattergun because United have not properly prepared for this.
It’s a mess overseen by people who inspire so little confidence in the fans. They’ve failed to appoint a single manager in the post-Ferguson era who was ahead of the curve in the way Pep Guardiola was at Barcelona or Jurgen Klopp and Thomas Tuchel were at Dortmund. All three found their way to the Premier League, where they have thrived. It’s a long time since United had a coveted boss of their own.
In The Athletic vote mentioned at the top of this piece, a 53 per cent majority picked “a long-term builder, even if it meant waiting longer for success”, while 47 per cent went for “someone experienced who could win things quickly”.
Solskjaer hoped to be the former and the fans were patient and supportive, but in the season that trophies were expected to arrive, United have imploded.
Most United supporters feel sadness that he’s lost his job, but also realism that it had to happen. Whichever type of successor the club they opt for, many will disagree with the choice. Unless of course, they start to win things again at last.
 
Do Manchester United even need a manager?
Do-Manchester-United-even-need-a-manager-1024x683.jpg

By John Muller Nov 23, 2021
comment-icon.png
166
save-icon.png

Say what you want about the sorry state of Manchester United, but it’s not like they haven’t tried to find the right manager.
Let’s take a quick warm-up jog down memory lane.
In David Moyes, United hired Sir Alex Ferguson’s hand-picked heir, a proven Premier League veteran who had taken Everton to unexpected heights and is doing it again at West Ham. Louis van Gaal arrived in Manchester as a key figure in the development of modern positional play. Jose Mourinho was still one of the most coveted coaches in the world. And then there’s sweet, uncomplicated Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, who only wanted to take care of his club and make some friends along the way but wound up leading United to a second-place finish, their best since the great man himself.
manager_table.png

The only thing these four coaches have in common is catastrophic failure. Measured against the lofty expectations of supporters, at least, each tenure ended in disaster. The Leader, the Tactician, the Special One, the Norwegian One: we’ve seen all kinds of characters in this comedy of errors and no one seems suited to restore Manchester United to their former glory. Surely the next guy will be different, right?
No, probably not. There’s a whole bunch of academic research on how much managers matter to a football team’s success, and for the most part, the findings are a great big shrug. Some studies examined the well-known “new manager bounce” and found it was just the normal way of things for a club to rebound after an unusually bad run, whether or not they sacrificed their manager to the angry football gods. Others tried to measure how many points coaches added after controlling for things such as wages, transfer fees, and player availability. Though a select few like Ferguson and Arsene Wenger seemed to significantly improve their squads, a lot of famous managers performed near enough to expectations that it was hard to say who’s really good.
But if managers don’t win football matches, who do?
Oh, right, the players.
Below is a comparison of teams’ points per game to the Transfermarkt value of the players on the pitch, weighted by minutes played and adjusted to 2021-22 levels. The idea is that Transfermarkt’s crowdsourced numbers can serve as a decent stand-in for the overall quality of a squad. Since the site updates during the season in response to performances, we’ll use each player’s value from the end of the previous season (shown by the red-circled numbers) where available, to better capture the talent a manager started with, not how he left it.
correlation-1.png

Sure enough, there’s a strong historical relationship between squad value and success in the Premier League that doesn’t seem to depend on who’s in the technical area. Every year since Ferguson retired, under four very different head coaches, United have had a good-but-not-great squad, and every year they’ve had good-but-not-great results. The problem isn’t that the wrong managers are holding them back from reaching the top — it’s that Manchester City and Liverpool simply have better players.
This is where you interrupt to point out that those clubs also happen to have exceptional managers, and of course you’re correct. One reason that City and Liverpool have good squads is that Pep Guardiola and Jurgen Klopp’s coaching staffs have made their players better through training and tactics. Another reason is that those clubs signed talented players who fit together in the first place. Guardiola himself is always going around trying to convince people he’s not a warlock. “Success depends on the quality of the players,” he said the other week. “Our influence in the game is much less than what people believe.”
Just think for a second about how we collectively decide who is and isn’t a good manager. It’s rare to have all that much insight into what’s happening on the training ground or during a dressing-room speech, let alone the ability to compare it to what’s going on at other training grounds and other dressing rooms. Managerial reputations are made on a dash of camera-ready charisma, a sprinkle of tacticky sound bites, and a big steaming helping of just win, baby. When the team plays well, it’s because the coach is a genius. When they lose, he or she is an idiot and we knew it all along.
Mark Carey wrote yesterday about Manchester United’s ClubElo rating under Solskjaer, a rating system borrowed from chess that weights match outcomes by the strength of the opponent. This seems like a smart way to get an empirical read on a manager’s CV. We do it here at The Athletic all the time. But we could just as easily tell the same kind of story by pegging the rise and fall of a team’s fortunes to changes in the squad. Is one more valid than the other? Honestly, who knows? As every sports fan’s favourite xkcd comic says, “A weighted random number generator just produced a new batch of numbers. Let’s use them to build narratives!”
utd_clubelo-1.png

The difficulty of pinning down football managers’ actual value makes it all the more baffling that clubs routinely spend millions to get their man and then millions more to fire him and his whole staff a year or so later, when it turns out he was the wrong man all along. Oops! On one hand, the exigencies of the entertainment business demand it. Fans don’t just want football, we want stories, and the manager is the main character in almost any club’s daytime soap. On the other hand, all that cash being lit on fire with each new sacking might have gone to a new defensive midfielder who could have saved the coach from the chopping block.
So here’s a modest proposal: what if Manchester United just didn’t appoint a manager? Let the club’s many talented assistants do the real day-to-day work of coaching that they already do, without all the distracting drama of a great man theory of management. Smart observers have been saying for a while the sport is moving in that direction anyway. Call off the coaching search. Put the club’s time and money toward building a squad whose best players make sense as a team. Maybe start with the defence.
If it’s a figurehead that’s needed to go on TV and talk about passion or whatever, there are several players who would probably volunteer. If someone has to be the last word on line-up decisions, put it to the captains. If it’s just not possible to play football without a manager, hire any available interim type and keep him around until he wears out his welcome. It worked pretty well for a while last time around — United hit their highest ClubElo rating since Ferguson under Solskjaer, who wasn’t even supposed to be there — and it’s a lot cheaper than tempting over Mauricio Pochettino or Ralf Rangnick.
As it turns out, that last idea has some support from the managerial impact research. The 2013 study where Ferguson and Wenger stood out included 60 Premier League managers active between 2004 to 2009. Only 15 beat the model’s expectations. One was Mourinho. Another was Moyes. Just below those two, lumped together under a generic heading, were all the games overseen by interim coaches. According to the table of results, after going toe-to-toe against 10,000 simulations, one of the best managers in England was No Manager.
 
The chosen interim
8a7ae751ae0b7009819cc567ef975eab.jpg

Confirmed by the BBC. An unfortunately excellent choice by United - probably the best piece of decision making since Fergie left. I expect he will be their next Director of Football and could set them on effective long-term development path.

And, in the near-term, our home fixture against United just got much more difficult. Rangnick will have some clear ideas on home to beat a Klopp team.
 
Confirmed by the BBC. An unfortunately excellent choice by United - probably the best piece of decision making since Fergie left. I expect he will be their next Director of Football and could set them on effective long-term development path.

And, in the near-term, our home fixture against United just got much more difficult. Rangnick will have some clear ideas on home to beat a Klopp team.
Don't be silly. It will end in failure. DOF? What's Murtough doing there?
 
Don't be silly. It will end in failure. DOF? What's Murtough doing there?

Getting replaced, if they are smart.

It could end in failure, for sure. But, this appointment has a much higher probability of success than the last 4 and, possibly includes some future vision, which would be a first in the Glazer era.

I hope I am completely paranoid for no reason.
 
So they lurch from one manager to another for years and then, mid-season they make a “strategic,” long-term appointment in the form of a caretaker/consultant? Nah, that smacks of another box-checking exercise, not evidence of any kind of coherent plan. It’s kind of hard to square patiently building with younger players around a gegenpressing philosophy, which is what Rangnick is known for, with signing a 36-year-old Ronaldo.
 
Last edited:
I have a genuine question though - why, despite his reputation, did he end up at Lokomotiv Moscow (when there were so many managerial changes going on)?
 
I have a genuine question though - why, despite his reputation, did he end up at Lokomotiv Moscow (when there were so many managerial changes going on)?
I'd like to know this. Last year when he was linked with the Chelsea job he turned it down saying he didn't want to be an interim manager so why the stance now? Because it's united? He won't have influence on signings in Jan if he's only there for 4 months. Various sources saying he will get some consultancy role after the summer. Wtf? Baffling
 
So they lurch from one manager to another for years and then, mid-season they make a “strategic,” long-term appointment in the form of a caretaker/consultant? Nah, that smacks of another box-checking exercise, not evidence of any kind of coherent plan. It’s kind of hard to square patiently building with younger players around a gegenpressing philosophy, which is what Rangnick is known for, with signing a 36-year-old Ronaldo.

I hope this is right! I am likely giving too much credit to the United board and the possibility that they have hit rock bottom and decided to change how they think about things.
 
I'd like to know this. Last year when he was linked with the Chelsea job he turned it down saying he didn't want to be an interim manager so why the stance now? Because it's united? He won't have influence on signings in Jan if he's only there for 4 months. Various sources saying he will get some consultancy role after the summer. Wtf? Baffling

Maybe they want him as DoF but can't get Pochettino (or whoever) till the summer so have asked him to steady the ship meanwhile?
 
Undermined before he comes in. 6 months...what real authority does that give him. Most of the problems are down to player attitude. Lazy and complacent squad. Turn up one week, go missing the next. Pogba typical example when he's fit. Martial...wonders in and out of games as does Rashford. Maquire can't maintain any level of consistency. Ditto Shaw. Gone for a short term fix, usually means nobody has a vision. Mess.
 
He's never managed a big club for a reason. It has potential, but only if he moves upstairs and oversees things and a new manager is OK, with that approach.

Definitely has a higher probability of success, but other issues enhancing failure as well

  1. Never managed a big club with big egos
  2. Never won anything really of note.
  3. He's a generation removed from the spoiled brats of United in their 20's - that's a massive cultural gap
I know it sounds much better, but after a few managerial bump wins, I'm thinking this is going to go badly.
 
I'd love to agree, Niall, but I'm not so sure. As a DoF he could sadly turn out to be a good choice, being the guy who's done more than anyone to establish the Red Bull set-up. As a manager his record is more spotty, but he won't take any cr@p from the prima donnas in their changing-room and they badly need that.

BTW the media are already getting on my wick with their pronunciation of his name. It's not "Ran-yick" FFS. Like the twerp who presents "Catchphrase" tells the contestants, say what you see. Rang-nick. Simples. :mad:
 
Getting in someone as interim manager for 6 months who hasn't been involved in management for a while to steady the ship, sounds like a recipe for disaster though.
Hope it burns and that we'll see him fighting Ronaldo at the training ground.
 



[article]I met the man four times since he arrived in Moscow in July. I’ve turned down interviews with him (clash of schedules) twice and had questions submitted to him refused once. We did manage to chat off the record, while on the record he told me of his views on Moscow and his plans to make Lokomotiv a super club.

Ralf Rangnick was brought in to revolutionise FC Lokomotiv Moscow ahead of a move to the Luzhniki Stadium. His bombast fizzled out with less than 5,000 fans watching Loko capitulate to a poor Akhmat Grozny at the RZD Arena last Saturday.

Long lost summer of hope
There were rumours going back to 2018 that Loko would move to the Luzhniki for big matches in the UEFA Champions League. The then-club CEO said never as he wanted to build an identity. Plus there would never be a demand for 60,000 tickets or more, even in 2019 when Cristiano Ronaldo and Juventus strolled into town.

Having rid Loko of the putrid Olga Smorodskaya and her sport director son-in-law, the club went up a gear in 2016. In came former Zenit commercial director Ilya Gerkus and he brought back fan legend Yuri Semin. To remove the smell of corruption and Semin’s sticky fingers from transfer dealings, he made a huge step in appointing former Schalke 04 man Erik Stoffelshaus the next year. The German made an immediate impact with low-to-no cost signings like Maciej Rybus, Jefferson Farfan and Eder, who fired Loko to a shock 2017-18 Russian Premier League win.

On and off the field the club were thriving, but worrying sounds came from Russian Railways (the club’s owner) and Yuri Semin. Semin was peeved that he was no longer the sole arbiter of who to buy and sell, even moreso when his friends in the south of Spain were out of the loop. Eventually, in mid-December 2018, eight months after winning the league, two of the men most responsible for the on and off field revolution in the east of Moscow were gone.

In the kitchen
Back in 2007 I had my first experience working on a project with Lokomotiv Moscow. Since then I’ve dealt with them in a media and professional sense every year since. There were personnel changes, ups and downs, but it always felt more homely than any other Moscow club. In 2016 I’d the depressing experience of seeing them play an almost dead rubber in front of 5,000 fans and the club actually setting the police on them.

When Ilya Gerkus came in, then Erik Stoffelshaus, I was a little skeptical, but gave them time. Changes were made, putting supporters first, bringing in really good professionals at every level of the club and proper plans into action. They were raking in more money than boastful Spartak and winning everywhere. But Semin was unhappy. While I was working on a Capital FM-Lokomotiv project, he avoided interviews because he had his go-to fanboys in the media to use, he made sure the only news was anti-Gerkus/Stoffelshaus. He lasted another year and a bit before he too was shafted by new forces moving within the club.

By this time, Loko had purged the club of the professional media and commercial staff, because high priced staff were no longer needed. I was still in the kitchen, as they say here, but almost out the back door. Despite a friendly facade, they were gradually withdrawing from the local community.

German revolution
A plan was hatched to move Lokomotiv Moscow from the 20-year-old RZD Arena to the Luzhniki in 2020. Ostensibly to renovate the area and stadium, as there were some minor issues with the roof. However those involved saw dollar signs. Where Lokomotiv Moscow are located, in Cherkizovo, there are fine transport facilities and the entire area contains not only the main RZD Arena, but also the 10,000 all-seater Sapsan Arena, an indoor multisport centre and ice rink. A full size field within an air dome, a park, academy housing, a multi-story car park, tennis courts and a number of outdoor training fields – including a full-size field with an identical surface to the RZD Arena.

When one of the directors of the club said in April this year “this is a huge piece of real estate”, he let the cat out of the bag. A Roman Abramovich associate, Evgeni Merkel, appeared on the Board of Directors and the big man himself was supposed to be buying a stake. The truth was far more unpalatable. A 50-year lease with the operating company for the Luzhniki Stadium had a clause in it that the club would immediately rent a training field within the complex for a minimum of 10 years, beginning in June 2021. The club are still paying heavily for this, while not using it. The plan was to move the club and sell the land for redevelopment. Moscow needs housing and the area is within the MKAD (Moscow Circle Road) which is the accepted boundary of the city and it’s power.

Once rumours became louder and leaks wetter, the Mayor of Moscow, Sergei Sobyanin, announced that Lokomotiv would not be moving to the Luzhniki and that there would be no way the Lokomotiv sports complex would be sold off for redevelopment. The trouble was, they’d already taken a downpayment for the sale, signed off on the training facilities at the Luzhniki and brought in Ralf Rangnick on a contract higher than any of the players at the club to “create a Russian Red Bull”.

When he told me that in our first meeting, alarm bells went off in my head. Six years ago I wrote about it on these pages and until now not a single journalist has investigated Red Bull, nor have any football authorities. Ralf’s dream of a Red Bull in Moscow had turned even the most dedicated from the club, except journalists who were desperate for a quote or two.

With Rangnick came Spartak Moscow reject Thomas Zorn as technical director and lots of odd transfer dealings, topped off with massive agents fees. This was no surprise, except to Russian sports media, given the CEO appointed by the club owners. A fish rots from the head down and Lokomotiv were back in the bad old days of 2016. The players who arrived in where largely terrible. Alexis Beka Beka has been ok but the others like Tin Jedvaj, Tino Andjorin and Gyrano Kerk, remain baffling choices. The senior players at the club also rejected his ideas and “advice”, with some willing to go on the record with their complaints.

Top down chaos
As Loko crashed to a 2-1 loss against one of the worst away teams in the league last Saturday, I noticed the camera zoom in on both Ralf and the man who installed him, Vladimir Leonchenko, the club CEO. To say that Leonchenko is out of his depth is an understatement. The former journeyman footballer, wannabe agent and dupe for one of the blackest of black eyes for Russian football, the Professional Footballer and Coach and Agent Union, Leonchenko was at his lowest ebb.

Having signed Rangnick to a €2.3million-a-year contract, given him tens of millions to spend and then letting him install a puppet, Gisdol, on the bench, Leonchenko was swimming with bigger sharks than even at Fakel Voronezh. After being the face of the disgraced PSFT, he was desperate to have all traces removed once his benefactor was hounded out of FIFPRo. At Loko he knew by August he’d made an almighty mess. He desperately tried to hang onto his job by offloading Rangnick, Zorn and Gisdol last month, yet there were no takers. Now, Manchester United look like willing gillies.

Rangnick fit in perfectly to the absolute madness at Lokomotiv Moscow. They purged themselves of top level media and sales operators. They alienated supporters and former players. Even community clubs, like my own Moscow Shamrocks GAA Club, found it hard to keep up with rent increases each quarter. Sponsors have not renewed contracts and the product on the pitch has also become difficult to sell. If Serbian Marko Nikolic’s conservative style was tough, the anti-revolution dross at the RZD is worse.

The English media will talk now about gegenpressing. About intensity. Manchester United fans will want to see him push their failing stars. Yet not one, I guarantee you, not one will point out his links to Bernd Pansold at Red Bull, nor his disdain for anti-doping. He has a history that will not be explored, but as with all fanbases, will any care if he gets results?

King Ralf will be happy to get away from Moscow, he’ll have another few months with a fat contract and possibly the players at Old Trafford might not refuse to follow his “program”, as happened at Lokomotiv. Lokomotiv Moscow’s gain is now Manchester United’s loss.[/article]
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom