You saying that makes him underrated.
Check out his goal scoring record, and the number of championships he's won with each of the teams he's been at.
Maybe it's because he has a long record of going missing in big games.baffles me how zlatan's football abilities keep being questioned on this site. the guy is incredible and probably one of the best football cv's in the world.
Jose in "great manager" claim shocka
massive sense of de javu. when you win titles for the biggest clubs in the world, in the biggest leagues on a constant basis, you perform. if you didn't perform in the so called big games, you would sooner or later be found out and shipped off.
for all those who want to bring up the champs league, I have one answer: djimi traore!
A lifetime of playing for the biggest, winning and scoring says it all.
Not quite. That "lifetime" has also seen him sent packing from a number of those clubs despite his obvious ability.
You saying that makes him underrated.
Check out his goal scoring record, and the number of championships he's won with each of the teams he's been at.
Didn't say that he wasn't good. He is, clearly, an incredibly talented player. But 'very good' and 'overrated' are not the same thing. Oh, and Clayton Blackmore's won more titles than Steven Gerrard. Titles don't necessarily determine a player's worth.
yeah, but was clayton transferred from Manure, to Juve, to Barca, to milan, etc for record fees and produced (and won) at the highest level consistently for a decade or so?
yeah, but was clayton transferred from Manure, to Juve, to Barca, to milan, etc for record fees and produced (and won) at the highest level consistently for a decade or so?
Exactly. He's got absolutely everything a top class striker needs, scores plenty against average sides or worse and has therefore collected a pile of club trophies, but too often he's failed to produce it against the best.
You're playing a blinder today Whaddapie.
No. but we're not comparing Blackmore and Ibra. I was merely pointing out how the whole "he's won trophies" line isn't enough to prove (nor disprove) a player's greatness.
sure, i'm not suggesting that either. my point is that by most reference points of a great player, zlatan ticks the box: talent, result, trophies, big fees, big clubs, individual performances etc etc.
This is like watching people argue that Lebron James isn't the best player in the NBA
This is like watching people argue that Lebron James isn't the best player in the NBA
Zlatan Ibrahimovic arguments go a little like this: Guy A points out that he's great because he won nine league titles with five different clubs in three different leagues and he's Sweden's third all-time leading goal scorer.
Guy B hits backs saying he's overrated since he never even played in a Champions League final or reached the semifinals of the World Cup or the Euros. It's evidence, he says, that Ibrahimovic disappears in big games.
And then it goes on, back and forth. It becomes a philosophical argument about what's more important: delivering league titles, which requires consistency over a whole year, or coming up big on the big stage, which requires that intangible "clutch" quality we in the media love to rave about.