• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Tottenham Riots

[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=46360.msg1380282#msg1380282 date=1313398005]
but then some other poor bugger gets them..

regards
[/quote]

Yes they do, but what can you do?

I'd stress that I'm not talking about the situation with families of the rioters being booted necessarily. This is more about families who have a long record of being a total pain in the arse in their community. There should be some action that a local authority can take.

Its an extremely difficult one because, as you say, someone will have to put up with them, but should it be the same people who have had to endure them for years through no fault of their own?
 
[quote author=singlerider link=topic=46360.msg1380496#msg1380496 date=1313430089]


Word from the streets is:

'Dickheads'

UK Riots - AC'S thoughts
[/quote]

Its like the blind leading the blind.

And what the fuck are his eyebrows all about?
 
i liked the che guvara bit, "what the fuck are you doing bruv? take tha fackin car back innit, we iz gonna redistribute da wealth later ya get me"
 
[quote author=Atlas link=topic=46360.msg1380601#msg1380601 date=1313440239]
Police killed a man, and now he's dead... I couldn't listen to any more of it.
[/quote]

Exactly!

I gave him a bit longer before fucking him off. I got to the bit where he said it was wrong to loot shops but ok to firebomb police stations and policemen. Plus, I bet he hasn't been stopped and searched "hundreds of times" nor do I bet he keeps the slips as a trophy.

I still don't get his eyebrows!
 
[quote author=singlerider link=topic=46360.msg1380249#msg1380249 date=1313393430]
[quote author=Red Mullet link=topic=46360.msg1380122#msg1380122 date=1313356896]
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=46360.msg1380117#msg1380117 date=1313356311]
A family should not be evicted for something their child has done.

That's a ridiculous state of affairs, and creates many more problems that it solves.
[/quote]


It's even more ridiculous that families and neighbourhoods should remain terrorised by a child from a family that clearly lack parenting skills.


The only problem it creates is where they go and how they'll affect their new neighbourhood.
[/quote]

So nick the kid - problem solved.

If it's only the child that is a menace to the neighbourhood, then it's unfair to punish a person for another's crime.

If the whole family are involved it's a different matter, but if removing the child removes the problem, how is it fair to punish the parents? Not every badly behaved kid has bad parents, and not all good kids come from good backgrounds. I'm not saying there's no connection, but this could go off on a massive nature/nurture tangent
[/quote]


Because the parents are legally and morally responsible for the kids behaviour and up bringing. As I've previously said, it is a case by case situation but evicting the family is a potential route to solving a neighbourhoods problem.
 
This evicting the parents because of the mistake of the kid is bullshit in most cases. I was arrested when i was a kid and my parent's weren't blamed because it was obviously my fault. Through small deterrents most kids will buck up their act if forced to - such as being threatened with simple shit like a suspended sentence which triggers a year in jail upon a second offence and such.

The best way to deal with those convicted is, for me, to make them pay back the community. Fix the church roof, spend 80 hours delivering old people's shopping. Obviously you'd have it under supervision to make sure they got the job done but often integrating with their own society and community and helping them will make them feel a part of society and prevent further problems occuring.

Obviously it won't work for everyone but if you reduce the number of repeat offenders and get something back in the community in return it's worth it.
 
Problem is red mullet it becomes another neighbourhoods problem.
There is then the argument well who cares we can stuff all the parents who don't give a crap and all the stupid asbo kids in one big estate.
 
[quote author=Atlas link=topic=46360.msg1380748#msg1380748 date=1313456399]
Problem is red mullet it becomes another neighbourhoods problem.
There is then the argument well who cares we can stuff all the parents who don't give a crap and all the stupid asbo kids in one big estate.


[/quote]


I've already said that.


My experience is that it's always a bunch of kids from different families so the idea is to split them up.


In my case a bunch of kids thought it was funny to brick in all the windows of the asian families in the neighbourhood. This happened for weeks and the police were powerless. These kids were around 9-13 years old. After gaining video evidence, writing letters to the local schools and MPs and the housing association, one of the families were evicted. One set of parents truly didn't know what their son was up to and agreed with the police to leave him in a police cell for one night, as soon as all this happened the window bricking stopped. I'm guessing the other families did not like the idea of being evicted and deterred their children.
 
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=46360.msg1380555#msg1380555 date=1313437371]
[quote author=singlerider link=topic=46360.msg1380496#msg1380496 date=1313430089]


Word from the streets is:

'Dickheads'

UK Riots - AC'S thoughts
[/quote]

Its like the blind leading the blind.

And what the fuck are his eyebrows all about?
[/quote]

I believe the eyebrows thing is originally inspired by...

Scarfaceinthefall.jpg
 
[quote author=Atlas link=topic=46360.msg1380748#msg1380748 date=1313456399]
Problem is red mullet it becomes another neighbourhoods problem.
There is then the argument well who cares we can stuff all the parents who don't give a crap and all the stupid asbo kids in one big estate.
[/quote]

It does indeed. However, when I have several families of this ilk in my neighbourhood, who do terrorise the place until someone stands up to them. I did it, they got fucked off out of the area.

Do I care? Yes, I care that my wife can walk outside the front door and not be called "cunt" by some sewer rat of kid who's parents have brought him to be like a chip off the old block. I care that my wife doesn't get told she'll get stabbed one night when she's not looking. I care that mine and my wife's cars are not vandalised for daring to ask them to behave in a civilised manner. I care that I don't have sewer rats trying to kick my front door in as a message when my wife and kids are in bed.

So yes, it does become someone else's problem. I respect the job you do and I imagine that the successes are amazing and leaving you feeling fulfilled. BUT, not every case can solved this way. Some people just don't care and don't want to be helped. These are the people who make our society nasty to live in and drag it down for the rest of us. Do I care about what happens to them? Do I care if society "forgets" them and doesn't help them? No I don't because I am content in the knowledge that these people just want to take, take and then take some more. Fuck them! Fuck them in the ear! Fuck them in the other ear!

But if they start making my life a misery, which several were, then I will follow the process to ensure that the pain is brought back to them - if they end up in a caravan, its their fucking fault for not giving a fuck in the first place. I can sleep in my bed contented knowing that I didn't get them evicted, they evicted themselves on account of not wanting to conform to a values system that is deemed acceptable to most decent people.
 
[quote author=themn link=topic=46360.msg1380830#msg1380830 date=1313487859]
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=46360.msg1380555#msg1380555 date=1313437371]
[quote author=singlerider link=topic=46360.msg1380496#msg1380496 date=1313430089]


Word from the streets is:

'Dickheads'

UK Riots - AC'S thoughts
[/quote]

Its like the blind leading the blind.

And what the fuck are his eyebrows all about?
[/quote]

I believe the eyebrows thing is originally inspired by...

Scarfaceinthefall.jpg

[/quote]

Really? Fucking really?!?!

*wonders if he is being whooshed*
 
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=46360.msg1380902#msg1380902 date=1313501264]
It does indeed. However, when I have several families of this ilk in my neighbourhood, who do terrorise the place until someone stands up to them. I did it, they got fucked off out of the area.

Do I care? Yes, I care that my wife can walk outside the front door and not be called "cunt" by some sewer rat of kid who's parents have brought him to be like a chip off the old block. I care that my wife doesn't get told she'll get stabbed one night when she's not looking. I care that mine and my wife's cars are not vandalised for daring to ask them to behave in a civilised manner. I care that I don't have sewer rats trying to kick my front door in as a message when my wife and kids are in bed.

So yes, it does become someone else's problem. I respect the job you do and I imagine that the successes are amazing and leaving you feeling fulfilled. BUT, not every case can solved this way. Some people just don't care and don't want to be helped. These are the people who make our society nasty to live in and drag it down for the rest of us. Do I care about what happens to them? Do I care if society "forgets" them and doesn't help them? No I don't because I am content in the knowledge that these people just want to take, take and then take some more. Fuck them! Fuck them in the ear! Fuck them in the other ear!

But if they start making my life a misery, which several were, then I will follow the process to ensure that the pain is brought back to them - if they end up in a caravan, its their fucking fault for not giving a fuck in the first place. I can sleep in my bed contented knowing that I didn't get them evicted, they evicted themselves on account of not wanting to conform to a values system that is deemed acceptable to most decent people.
[/quote]

It's not about the job I do Spion, or anything like that.
I totally understand the point you and other have made with regards to this, in the area where I currently work police are looking at putting pressure on the council to re-house one of the families whose 2 boys continually cause trouble (I meet the 6 year old boy the other day and can see him pissing people off in about 5 years time, sad as that might be). I can dig this no problem, I understand the influence these guys have on others and the problems they cause and toally understand the benefit of them being kicked out of the estate.

My comment was about creating areas where all the 'bad' people are kinda dumped in a shanty town like area. There would be no (or very little) hope for those kids who grow up in the area then at all.

"These are the people who make our society nasty to live in and drag it down for the rest of us" but short of killing each person or sending them off to Australia we have to deal with them as far as I see it.
If they take take take, then they will continue to do so. Stuff like this will then become the norm and we really don't need to get dragged into this every year.

It's not about 'hug a hoodie' or some other such shite tagline, this is about getting people to understand they are responsible for their own actions if that means punishment as a form of deterrant then so be it for those involved..but Imo it should also be about using that as an opportunity to allow people to rehibilitate and reflect.
 
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=46360.msg1380245#msg1380245 date=1313393123]
[quote author=Red Mullet link=topic=46360.msg1380122#msg1380122 date=1313356896]
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=46360.msg1380117#msg1380117 date=1313356311]
A family should not be evicted for something their child has done.

That's a ridiculous state of affairs, and creates many more problems that it solves.
[/quote]


It's even more ridiculous that families and neighbourhoods should remain terrorised by a child from a family that clearly lack parenting skills.


The only problem it creates is where they go and how they'll affect their new neighbourhood.
[/quote]

Yep, been there and experienced that.

But don't worry, the rights of the terrorisers have to be respected above those of the terrorised. Perhaps we should give them a free holiday so as to understand them?
[/quote]

Bring back medieval stocks.
 
Two guys were sentenced to four years after posting something on facebook about rioting. They were inciting violence apparently!
I agree there should be sentences handed out to deter people, it shouldn't be what they stole but the fact that they were there willing to steal anything imo and so am comfortable with the guy getting a few months for stealing water.
Four years for a stupid facebook message that resulted in no
Riots no anti social behaviour and no issues is a well over the top!

I'm sure if I went on the bnp or edl or al maj type orgs facebook pages I could find something that amounted to inciting violence.
 
[quote author=Atlas link=topic=46360.msg1380955#msg1380955 date=1313508710]
[quote author=Spionkop69 link=topic=46360.msg1380902#msg1380902 date=1313501264]
It does indeed. However, when I have several families of this ilk in my neighbourhood, who do terrorise the place until someone stands up to them. I did it, they got fucked off out of the area.

Do I care? Yes, I care that my wife can walk outside the front door and not be called "cunt" by some sewer rat of kid who's parents have brought him to be like a chip off the old block. I care that my wife doesn't get told she'll get stabbed one night when she's not looking. I care that mine and my wife's cars are not vandalised for daring to ask them to behave in a civilised manner. I care that I don't have sewer rats trying to kick my front door in as a message when my wife and kids are in bed.

So yes, it does become someone else's problem. I respect the job you do and I imagine that the successes are amazing and leaving you feeling fulfilled. BUT, not every case can solved this way. Some people just don't care and don't want to be helped. These are the people who make our society nasty to live in and drag it down for the rest of us. Do I care about what happens to them? Do I care if society "forgets" them and doesn't help them? No I don't because I am content in the knowledge that these people just want to take, take and then take some more. Fuck them! Fuck them in the ear! Fuck them in the other ear!

But if they start making my life a misery, which several were, then I will follow the process to ensure that the pain is brought back to them - if they end up in a caravan, its their fucking fault for not giving a fuck in the first place. I can sleep in my bed contented knowing that I didn't get them evicted, they evicted themselves on account of not wanting to conform to a values system that is deemed acceptable to most decent people.
[/quote]

It's not about the job I do Spion, or anything like that.
I totally understand the point you and other have made with regards to this, in the area where I currently work police are looking at putting pressure on the council to re-house one of the families whose 2 boys continually cause trouble (I meet the 6 year old boy the other day and can see him pissing people off in about 5 years time, sad as that might be). I can dig this no problem, I understand the influence these guys have on others and the problems they cause and toally understand the benefit of them being kicked out of the estate.

My comment was about creating areas where all the 'bad' people are kinda dumped in a shanty town like area. There would be no (or very little) hope for those kids who grow up in the area then at all.

"These are the people who make our society nasty to live in and drag it down for the rest of us" but short of killing each person or sending them off to Australia we have to deal with them as far as I see it.
If they take take take, then they will continue to do so. Stuff like this will then become the norm and we really don't need to get dragged into this every year.

It's not about 'hug a hoodie' or some other such shite tagline, this is about getting people to understand they are responsible for their own actions if that means punishment as a form of deterrant then so be it for those involved..but Imo it should also be about using that as an opportunity to allow people to rehibilitate and reflect.
[/quote]

I think we are broadly agreeing with each other!!!
 
[quote author=Atlas link=topic=46360.msg1381164#msg1381164 date=1313570025]
Two guys were sentenced to four years after posting something on facebook about rioting. They were inciting violence apparently!
I agree there should be sentences handed out to deter people, it shouldn't be what they stole but the fact that they were there willing to steal anything imo and so am comfortable with the guy getting a few months for stealing water.
Four years for a stupid facebook message that resulted in no
Riots no anti social behaviour and no issues is a well over the top!

I'm sure if I went on the bnp or edl or al maj type orgs facebook pages I could find something that amounted to inciting violence.
[/quote]

Its another example of sentencing not being consistent with what it would be in other circumstances.

If there had been no other riots and you or I posted a notice on Facebook or Twitter calling for a riot then what would have happened? I can't find what the sentencing guidelines would be for this offence but I doubt we'd end up in prison.

Same as the person I read about today being charged with stealing a bottle of drink from a shop and being told to expect a lengthy sentence. Unless they were just trying to scare her then that is madness. If I stole a bottle of water right now I doubt it would even end up in court.
 
It's a matter of degree. Even the Howard League for Penal Reform has conceded the principle that there were aggravating circumstances surrounding these offences which justify their being dealt with more harshly than usual. The real question is "how much more harshly" and I would agree that one or two of these sentences are questionable from that point of view, though I wonder how much consistency you'd get if you asked a random sample of members of the public where the line *should* be drawn.
 
As long as accused are given a fair trial then who are we to second guess the sentences handed down by those properly appointed?

Those subject to the criminal law have the right of appeal don't they?
 
[quote author=jexykrodic link=topic=46360.msg1381217#msg1381217 date=1313577781]
As long as accused are given a fair trial then who are we to second guess the sentences handed down by those properly appointed?

Those subject to the criminal law have the right of appeal don't they?
[/quote]

They do indeed have the right to appeal, and I would imagine that many will take that right. But given that the courts have been struggling with the numbers of cases, won't that just repeat that problem when all the same cases come up for appeal?
 
[quote author=jexykrodic link=topic=46360.msg1381217#msg1381217 date=1313577781]
As long as accused are given a fair trial then who are we to second guess the sentences handed down by those properly appointed?

Those subject to the criminal law have the right of appeal don't they?


[/quote]

What sort of logic is that? By the same token should we never question Politicians? The Police? What can you question? Also, have you seen the demographic make-up of judges in this country?

To hand out a 4 year sentence over Facebook activity is clearly a Judge wanting to get in the headlines. I doubt many rioters and looters themselves will get a penalty longer than fours years, and they've committed far more serious offences.
 
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=46360.msg1381296#msg1381296 date=1313587844]
[quote author=jexykrodic link=topic=46360.msg1381217#msg1381217 date=1313577781]
As long as accused are given a fair trial then who are we to second guess the sentences handed down by those properly appointed?

Those subject to the criminal law have the right of appeal don't they?


[/quote]

What sort of logic is that? By the same token should we never question Politicians? The Police? What can you question? Also, have you seen the demographic make-up of judges in this country?

To hand out a 4 year sentence over Facebook activity is clearly a Judge wanting to get in the headlines. I doubt many rioters and looters themselves will get a penalty longer than fours years, and they've committed far more serious offences.
[/quote]

I suspect the ones who burned down shops and houses will get long sentences, and anyone who is caught organising riots that actually happened will too.

I don't know if the judge was necessarily trying to make headlines for himself but I do think that sentencing guidelines have gone out the window and judges are playing to the crowds a bit now. The majority of the general public ALWAYS want more people to be sent to prison. Normally judges can't do so, and now the opportunity is there it seems they are taking it.
 
I'm not sure this is necessarily a case of headline-hunting. There has been mention in the media of government letting it be known that it wants tougher sentences passed on these people, though I'm not aware of all the details.
 
No judge would admit to being influenced by anything a politician might say. However, I heard one senior judge today point out that the "guidelines" are just that, and not tram lines. They don't have to adhere to them.
 
Convicted nonces have been given much less.

Michael Howard was on the Today programme making the point that the public will lose confidence in the justice system if harsh sentences were not handed down.

The ex-copper on there with him made the point that it works the other way as well - the public will lose confidence in the justice system if the punishments handed out are disproportionate
 
[quote author=singlerider link=topic=46360.msg1381372#msg1381372 date=1313602121]
I reckon the Kaiser Chiefs must be shitting themselves right about now
[/quote]

Ah but they only predicted it. They didn't recruit for it! ;D
 
Back
Top Bottom