• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

This is more like it.....Ruud

Status
Not open for further replies.
Van Nistlenuts has never been a striker who's relied on pace.

It's his positional sense and ability to shoot on target -in the tightest of spaces - that's made him a deadly marksman throughout his career.

Strikers like him suffer far less with age, than someone like Owen.


Take strikers like Sheringham, Bergkamp, Zola or DiCanio as suitable 'ageless' attackers.
 
[quote author=Terrier link=topic=37283.msg992426#msg992426 date=1258641824]
Van Nistlenuts has never been a striker who's relied on pace.

It's his positional sense and ability to shoot on target -in the tightest of spaces - that's made him a deadly marksman throughout his career.

Strikers like him suffer far less with age, than someone like Owen.


Take strikers like Sheringham, Bergkamp, Zola or DiCanio as suitable 'ageless' attackers.
[/quote]

Thoughtful, skilful, cerebral strikers who all created as many - if not more - goals than they scored.

So absolutely FUCK ALL like RVN. Apart from being not very old, and not very quick.
 
[quote author=Sunny link=topic=37283.msg992241#msg992241 date=1258628997]
I hate him too Bunny. But he would score goals - 33 or not. And we're in desparate need of striking cover. Of course, if more suitable options came available they'd be preferable.
[/quote]

Which is exactly the point, we need to try and save our season, and by save I mean merely finishing in the top four.

regards
 
If we were interested in this type of striker, then surely Owen would have been signed in the summer (cheaper, younger and probably happier to sit on the bench).

He's old and slow + I'd suspect that he'd want to play more than just a bit part role.

I just can't see Rafa wanting a player Like RVN
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=37283.msg992429#msg992429 date=1258642392]
[quote author=Terrier link=topic=37283.msg992426#msg992426 date=1258641824]
Van Nistlenuts has never been a striker who's relied on pace.

It's his positional sense and ability to shoot on target -in the tightest of spaces - that's made him a deadly marksman throughout his career.

Strikers like him suffer far less with age, than someone like Owen.


Take strikers like Sheringham, Bergkamp, Zola or DiCanio as suitable 'ageless' attackers.
[/quote]

Thoughtful, skilful, cerebral strikers who all created as many - if not more - goals than they scored.

So absolutely FUCK ALL like RVN. Apart from being not very old, and not very quick.
[/quote]



Was more related to the age factor.


Regardless, I would take RVN in a heartbeat, especially over that hapless cunt Voronin.
 
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992436#msg992436 date=1258643465]
If we were interested in this type of striker, then surely Owen would have been signed in the summer (cheaper, younger and probably happier to sit on the bench).

He's old and slow + I'd suspect that he'd want to play more than a bit part role.
[/quote]

I think RVN would still be more effective than Owen, but we should still have gone for Owen anyway, but Rafa does not like him. We only need someone for a few months to slot some goals in.
As has been said, he may be slow now, but I still think he could score goals, and for what it would cost we don't have a lot to lose

regards
 
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=37283.msg992439#msg992439 date=1258643717]
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992436#msg992436 date=1258643465]
If we were interested in this type of striker, then surely Owen would have been signed in the summer (cheaper, younger and probably happier to sit on the bench).

He's old and slow + I'd suspect that he'd want to play more than a bit part role.
[/quote]

I think RVN would still be more effective than Owen, but we should still have gone for Owen anyway, but Rafa does not like him. We only need someone for a few months to slot some goals in.
As has been said, he may be slow now, but I still think he could score goals, and for what it would cost we don't have a lot to lose

regards
[/quote]

Well we'll only find that out if he signed Vlad, so i guess thats still open to debate.

Do you honestly think he'd even consider it though? I would have thought that one of his main reasons for moving on, would be to go to a club where he'd play.

I can't see Rafa moving SG out wide to accommodate a 33 year old personally (or leaving out Mascher or Aquilani for that matter).
 
I'm not interested.

There's other alternatives out there who aren't United hero's. The thought of the Kop going 'RUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE' makes me feel a bit sick.
 
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992448#msg992448 date=1258644458]
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=37283.msg992439#msg992439 date=1258643717]
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992436#msg992436 date=1258643465]
If we were interested in this type of striker, then surely Owen would have been signed in the summer (cheaper, younger and probably happier to sit on the bench).

He's old and slow + I'd suspect that he'd want to play more than a bit part role.
[/quote]

I think RVN would still be more effective than Owen, but we should still have gone for Owen anyway, but Rafa does not like him. We only need someone for a few months to slot some goals in.
As has been said, he may be slow now, but I still think he could score goals, and for what it would cost we don't have a lot to lose

regards
[/quote]

Well we'll only find that out if he signed Vlad, so i guess thats still open to debate.

Do you honestly think he'd even consider it though? I would have thought that one of his main reasons for moving on, would be to go to a club where he'd play.

I can't see Rafa moving SG out wide to accommodate a 33 year old personally (or leaving out Mascher or Aquilani for that matter).
[/quote]

Mate, I don't think Van Nostrilboy has a simple choice to make here. He wants to play, and if he went to some middle-ranking club he probably could still get a regular place, but he's not going to do so at a big club at his age and with his recent injury history. So yes, I think he would consider it, and if he was up for it I'd sign him. The difference between RVN and Owen, which makes RVN a better bet than Owen would have been IMO, is that RVN could play as the one up front if needed.
 
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=37283.msg992449#msg992449 date=1258644481]
I'm not interested.

There's other alternatives out there who aren't United hero's. The thought of the Kop going 'RUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE' makes me feel a bit sick.
[/quote]

Well they wouldn't.

Just like they didn't chant "BRUNO BRUNO" when Heskey scored.
 
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=37283.msg992484#msg992484 date=1258646980]
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992448#msg992448 date=1258644458]
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=37283.msg992439#msg992439 date=1258643717]
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992436#msg992436 date=1258643465]
If we were interested in this type of striker, then surely Owen would have been signed in the summer (cheaper, younger and probably happier to sit on the bench).

He's old and slow + I'd suspect that he'd want to play more than a bit part role.
[/quote]

I think RVN would still be more effective than Owen, but we should still have gone for Owen anyway, but Rafa does not like him. We only need someone for a few months to slot some goals in.
As has been said, he may be slow now, but I still think he could score goals, and for what it would cost we don't have a lot to lose

regards
[/quote]

Well we'll only find that out if he signed Vlad, so i guess thats still open to debate.

Do you honestly think he'd even consider it though? I would have thought that one of his main reasons for moving on, would be to go to a club where he'd play.

I can't see Rafa moving SG out wide to accommodate a 33 year old personally (or leaving out Mascher or Aquilani for that matter).
[/quote]

Mate, I don't think Van Nostrilboy has a simple choice to make here. He wants to play, and if he went to some middle-ranking club he probably could still get a regular place, but he's not going to do so at a big club at his age and with his recent injury history. So yes, I think he would consider it, and if he was up for it I'd sign him. The difference between RVN and Owen, which makes RVN a better bet than Owen would have been IMO, is that RVN could play as the one up front if needed.
[/quote]

I read his comments in that article, as saying that he wants to play in order to get into the national squad again mate. I'm just not convinced that he'd move from RM where he's sitting on the bench, to us where he could well be doing the same.

I do of course agree that we need a striker in January, and i guess it comes down to how much we've got to spend. I just hope we've got enough to ensure that we don't have to go for someone like RVN personally.

How much do you think he'd cost?
 
I'm sure he'd prefer to be playing, but he has to ask himself whether he's more likely to catch the eye of his national team manager as no.2 at Liverpool (or another club of similar standing) than he would at some mediocre outfit which nobody ever bothers with.

As for the fee, Real will try to stiff us if we do go in for him, but if he wants to come he can put pressure on to help get the deal done, just like Owen could have if he'd had the cojones.
 
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=37283.msg992484#msg992484 date=1258646980]
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992448#msg992448 date=1258644458]
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=37283.msg992439#msg992439 date=1258643717]
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992436#msg992436 date=1258643465]
If we were interested in this type of striker, then surely Owen would have been signed in the summer (cheaper, younger and probably happier to sit on the bench).

He's old and slow + I'd suspect that he'd want to play more than a bit part role.
[/quote]

I think RVN would still be more effective than Owen, but we should still have gone for Owen anyway, but Rafa does not like him. We only need someone for a few months to slot some goals in.
As has been said, he may be slow now, but I still think he could score goals, and for what it would cost we don't have a lot to lose

regards
[/quote]

Well we'll only find that out if he signed Vlad, so i guess thats still open to debate.

Do you honestly think he'd even consider it though? I would have thought that one of his main reasons for moving on, would be to go to a club where he'd play.

I can't see Rafa moving SG out wide to accommodate a 33 year old personally (or leaving out Mascher or Aquilani for that matter).
[/quote]

Mate, I don't think Van Nostrilboy has a simple choice to make here. He wants to play, and if he went to some middle-ranking club he probably could still get a regular place, but he's not going to do so at a big club at his age and with his recent injury history. So yes, I think he would consider it, and if he was up for it I'd sign him. The difference between RVN and Owen, which makes RVN a better bet than Owen would have been IMO, is that RVN could play as the one up front if needed.
[/quote]

I agree with that. I still think he has been one of the top strikers in the world during the last 15 years but one thing Owen has never been able to do is play up front on his own. RVN has shown himself capable of doing so.


Having said that I still think if Rafa makes a genuine attempt at signing Ruud then he demonstrates two things;

1) A failure to comprehend the depth of distaste for all things manc.
2) Allowing his personal feelings to interfere with the needs of the club. Owen in the summer would be a far better option than Ruud in January.

It's all very easy to say that Owen wasn't needed in the summer because we had Torres and he didn't have a crystal ball. 85% of this fourm knew and stated repeatedly that N'Gog, Voronin and Babel were not going to provide adequate cover for Torres. Given he was signing a key midfielder with long term injury then cover for Torres was a gimme.

RVN is obviously a bandaid cause he's not going to be around for long - certainly not as long as Owen is likely to be and it still doesn't solve our issues out wide. In short we get a very temporary, possible solution to one problem but still missing our major issue - yet it may be necessary in order for the manager to keep his job and the club to make the top 4 this season.

It really reflects a manager trying to fight spot fires all over the place rather than one implementing the overall vision and strategy the club needs. I guess that is where we are at.
 
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=37283.msg992770#msg992770 date=1258669501]
I'd be stunned if Rafa wanted Van Nistelrooy.
[/quote]
As good a reason as any......
 
What is all this talk of as a back up.

Get him in get him playing up front with Torres every game.

Put Gerrard in the middle or wide right and you have yourself an attacking trio that would shit goals.
 
They couldn't play up front togethor Dreamy, for a variety of reasons.

even if we buy him as back-up to torres alone, he'll still end up playing most games what with Fernando's injury record anyway.
 
[quote author=Wizardry link=topic=37283.msg992756#msg992756 date=1258668872]
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=37283.msg992484#msg992484 date=1258646980]
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992448#msg992448 date=1258644458]
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=37283.msg992439#msg992439 date=1258643717]
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37283.msg992436#msg992436 date=1258643465]
If we were interested in this type of striker, then surely Owen would have been signed in the summer (cheaper, younger and probably happier to sit on the bench).

He's old and slow + I'd suspect that he'd want to play more than a bit part role.
[/quote]

I think RVN would still be more effective than Owen, but we should still have gone for Owen anyway, but Rafa does not like him. We only need someone for a few months to slot some goals in.
As has been said, he may be slow now, but I still think he could score goals, and for what it would cost we don't have a lot to lose

regards
[/quote]

Well we'll only find that out if he signed Vlad, so i guess thats still open to debate.

Do you honestly think he'd even consider it though? I would have thought that one of his main reasons for moving on, would be to go to a club where he'd play.

I can't see Rafa moving SG out wide to accommodate a 33 year old personally (or leaving out Mascher or Aquilani for that matter).
[/quote]

Mate, I don't think Van Nostrilboy has a simple choice to make here. He wants to play, and if he went to some middle-ranking club he probably could still get a regular place, but he's not going to do so at a big club at his age and with his recent injury history. So yes, I think he would consider it, and if he was up for it I'd sign him. The difference between RVN and Owen, which makes RVN a better bet than Owen would have been IMO, is that RVN could play as the one up front if needed.
[/quote]

I agree with that. I still think he has been one of the top strikers in the world during the last 15 years but one thing Owen has never been able to do is play up front on his own. RVN has shown himself capable of doing so.


Having said that I still think if Rafa makes a genuine attempt at signing Ruud then he demonstrates two things;

1) A failure to comprehend the depth of distaste for all things manc.
2) Allowing his personal feelings to interfere with the needs of the club. Owen in the summer would be a far better option than Ruud in January.

It's all very easy to say that Owen wasn't needed in the summer because we had Torres and he didn't have a crystal ball. 85% of this fourm knew and stated repeatedly that N'Gog, Voronin and Babel were not going to provide adequate cover for Torres. Given he was signing a key midfielder with long term injury then cover for Torres was a gimme.

RVN is obviously a bandaid cause he's not going to be around for long - certainly not as long as Owen is likely to be and it still doesn't solve our issues out wide. In short we get a very temporary, possible solution to one problem but still missing our major issue - yet it may be necessary in order for the manager to keep his job and the club to make the top 4 this season.

It really reflects a manager trying to fight spot fires all over the place rather than one implementing the overall vision and strategy the club needs. I guess that is where we are at.

[/quote]

Your usual interesting post, but I'd take you up on a few things in it:

1. Sensitivity may not be Rafa's middle name, but I can't believe even he's in any doubt about how the Mancs are regarded by LFC and all who sail in her.

2. I genuinely don't understand your "personal feelings" point. Are you saying they prevented Rafa signing Owen or that they would in the future? Whichever, I have to say I don't agree. Either Rafa's the ultimate cold-eyed pro (which I would agree with, and which would lead him to go for players such as RVN if he thought they could do us a job) or he isn't. I don't think any criticism of him can fairly have it both ways.

3. You're assuming Rafa chose not to go for a back-up to Torres. It's possible, but I doubt it. My guess at a more likely scenario would be that such a deal was the biggest casualty of the decision by H and G to tell Rafa any proposed wage increases would have to come out of the same kitty.

4. My biggest disagreement with you is over your final para. I simply don't accept the "either/or" you set up there. To me Rafa is demonstrably trying to implement an overall vision and strategy. Along the way there are fires to fight - and yes, some of them can be traced back to errors of judgment by the man himself - but when has that not been the case in football?
 
Liverpool lining up January move for Ruud van Nistelrooy - Exclusive
Published 23:00 21/11/09 By Simon Mullock
Recommend (11)

Ruud Van Nistelrooy is being lined up for a New Year move to Liverpool.

The Dutch striker is surplus to requirements at Real Madrid as he recovers from the latest of a series of injuries that have limited him to four appearances this season.

Anfield boss Rafa Benitez is looking at the possibility of taking the former Manchester United striker on loan until the end of the season as he aims to add firepower to his team.

Van Nistelrooy, 33, is also attracting interest from Tottenham and Manchester City as he nears fitness following a thigh problem.

But he would prefer a move to Anfield because he believes Liverpool will still be fighting for the Premier League title at the end of the season – and that would help him secure a place in Holland’s World Cup squad.

It’s a move that would send shock waves all the way to Old Trafford.

Sir Alex Ferguson believed he landed a huge psychological blow on Benitez when he persuaded former Liverpool striker Michael Owen to join United in the summer. Recruiting Van Nistelrooy would give the Merseysiders a big New Year lift as they look to get back into the title race.

Van Nistelrooy scored 95 goals in 150 appearances for United before moving to Spain three years ago in a £18million deal after falling out with Ferguson.

Real signed Cristiano Ronaldo and Karim Benzema last summer, while Van Nistelrooy is also behind Bernabeu golden boy Raul in the pecking order.

Benitez will be given a limited budget for signings in January – and a loan move for Van Nistelrooy is a big attraction.

Van Nistelrooy’s goal-scoring pedigree is impressive. In three seasons he has been the Champions League top marksman. He is currently the Champions League second highest scorer – only Raul has more.

As well as having World Cup aspirations Van Nistelrooy also needs to secure a long-term contract. His current agreement with Real expires next summer.

The other big attraction for Benitez is that Van Nistelrooy can operate as a solo striker in the way he currently deploys Fernando Torres.
 
We'l probably sign him. Then he will require two months to recover from injury, and then Rafa will ease him into the team over the following two months as he need match fitness
 
(a) We're broke and so even if he were 'free' we couldn't afford the agent fee/sign-on fee/wages

(b) He is an unmitigated twat of a Manc.
 
[quote author=Dee link=topic=37283.msg995714#msg995714 date=1258918085]
(a) We're broke and so even if he were 'free' we couldn't afford the agent fee/sign-on fee/wages

(b) He is an unmitigated twat of a Manc.
[/quote]

I don't care if he's ex-manc or not. If he gets us into the top four and win cups, he's wanted.
 
[quote author=FoxForceFive link=topic=37283.msg1024636#msg1024636 date=1262368564]
Anyone who doesnt want RVN is quite quite mad.
[/quote]

x2

smug bastards too
 
According to Balague Rafa isn't interested.

If we sign him, Balague won't have much credibility regarding insider info re Rafa.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom