Tbh.. He showed more leadership in that clip where he has defended Coutinho than Henderson has done since he was given the armband
Tbh.. He showed more leadership in that clip where he has defended Coutinho than Henderson has done since he was given the armband
I guess some haven't taught, or been taught. There's nothing to be smug about by concluding that a player who has regressed under one coach will definitely not progress under another. It's not really the massively rational judgement that some have convinced themselves it is. Thank god they haven't been on the receiving end of such dogmatic cynicism.
Henderson hasn't deserved the captains arm band this year, he did after 13/14.
He had a good game where he pressed and did a lot of work around the pitch. But if he's going to be an AM he needs to offer a lot more end product than he currently is. So i don't get why the current excitement. Is it because when you go from performances which are total turd to a good hard working performance it makes you look better?
He had a good game where he pressed and did a lot of work around the pitch. But if he's going to be an AM he needs to offer a lot more end product than he currently is. So i don't get why the current excitement. Is it because when you go from performances which are total turd to a good hard working performance it makes you look better?
It’s intersting that Klopp is turning a player who mostly played wing-back into a forward, while making an attacking midfielder like Wijnaldum into a CM/DM. Hope he has better insight than these players’ previous managers. With his record of working with players so far I’d back him to be right more often than not.
And I don't get these constant references by his critics to "a good game". That suggests he's had just the one, which is simply not true. He's had a series of them and they represent a definite improvement on his earliest performances. No-one's calling him a second Messi but there's clear reason for optimism here.
Well i guess its all about opinions. His previous games IMO were ok, decent, improving but nothing special. The Bournemouth game was the first time i thought "impressive".And I don't get these constant references by his critics to "a good game". That suggests he's had just the one, which is simply not true. He's had a series of them and they represent a definite improvement on his earliest performances. No-one's calling him a second Messi but there's clear reason for optimism here.
How many starts has he had and what is your definition of good?
First question: more than he did when he first arrived, which I don't think is a coincidence.
Second question: both committed and effective.
5 league starts and he's had one standout game. The point made by the press is perfectly fine.
Alex O has been mostly excellent in the minutes he's played, so far, but he has an uphill battle to impress. Too many of my mates seem to be actively looking for negatives in his game as if to somehow justify their chagrin at Klopp's summer transfer activity.
All I know is anyone referring to this player as The Ox needs shooting in the fucking head.