• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

the future is bright ....

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like players like him. Boys that want the ball, can keep it with their heads up, and who can see things unfolding.

it's funny you say that as there was a great chance for a breakaway and he elected to shoot when a pass to his right would have sent bellamy clean through on goal. was funny when bellamy made a 'keep you head up' motion.
 
He's got great technical ability, and looks very comfortbale on the ball. His first touch is excellent, and he reads things quite well, but I take your point Gene; he's a bit loose. Maybe loose isn't the word I'm after, but it's as though he doesn't know how to play within a team. That happens quality youngsters that come from the lower leagues - they tend to hold onto it too long, to look for the difficult pass/shot/cross, and to do too much cos they've become accustomed to not wanting to rely on their teammates. Maybe it's just inexperience and naivety, but he needs to be coached how to play a more free-flowing team game, than this no guts no glory approach he has.

I like players like him. Boys that want the ball, can keep it with their heads up, and who can see things unfolding. You work with kids like that cos they've got something. Iron out the kinks and you might really have something. This isn't a criticism of Dalglish, but I'd love to see what a top class coach would do with a kid like him. Someone who could really teach him how to play as a quality midfielder.

My only concern with him is how much does he really want it? Is he desperate enough to push himself to learn to be a better player? I worry he might be a bit too comfortable in his own ability and skin. If you apply the workrate to what is quite obviously a talented kid, you'll get a player. Be interesting to see how his development goes over the next year or two.

Agree with all this. Having said that, I think many of the kinks would be ironed out with regular games. Sure, he's rough around the edges, but he's an intelligent footballer, and I'm pretty sure if he's given the opportunity to play with the likes of Gerrard and Suarez on a regular basis, he'll figure out most of it for himself. A bit of tactical guidance is all he needs (for instance when to release the ball quickly), but I wouldn't want to overload the boy with instructions. If anything, I see him in a roaming role, with very few strings attached.
 
There was a moment in injury time when we were under the cosh when he won the ball and drilled a super daisy cutter towards the corner flag that demanded our player go after it.
It was a great piece of invention.
Hes got ability and I LOVED how much he wanted the ball and how much he demands to be involved.
 
What I like about Shelvey is that he has the drive and the passion to improve himself. He's also confident about his ability.
He's the type of kid who grew being the best player in his u10 team, school team etc. You see it in the way he plays, always demands the ball, tries to find space and dictate play. I had high hopes when he joined, he hasn't disappointed yet.
 
There was a moment in injury time when we were under the cosh when he won the ball and drilled a super daisy cutter towards the corner flag that demanded our player go after it.
It was a great piece of invention.
Hes got ability and I LOVED how much he wanted the ball and how much he demands to be involved.

Exactly. He's not afraid to try. Something our entire squad has been for months.
 
I thought all our young players were excellent today, except maybe flanno but he is young and ultimately he will learn.
still think some people are far too eager to bin off johnson, selling johnson would leave us with kelly (who is injury prone) and flanno who very raw.
 
I thought all our young players were excellent today, except maybe flanno but he will learn and ultimately he will learn.
still think some people are far too eager to bin off johnson, selling johnson would leave us with kelly (who is injury prone) and flanno who very raw.
He will learn. And then he will have learned. And with that ultimately learning will be learn learned.
 
This thread is making me happy. As everyone knows, I've banged on about Jonjo for a while. Having said that, I agree with Ryan that he needs a lot more learning, and top class coaching could really bring out a top player in him.
 
He's got great technical ability, and looks very comfortbale on the ball. His first touch is excellent, and he reads things quite well, but I take your point Gene; he's a bit loose. Maybe loose isn't the word I'm after, but it's as though he doesn't know how to play within a team. That happens quality youngsters that come from the lower leagues - they tend to hold onto it too long, to look for the difficult pass/shot/cross, and to do too much cos they've become accustomed to not wanting to rely on their teammates. Maybe it's just inexperience and naivety, but he needs to be coached how to play a more free-flowing team game, than this no guts no glory approach he has.

I like players like him. Boys that want the ball, can keep it with their heads up, and who can see things unfolding. You work with kids like that cos they've got something. Iron out the kinks and you might really have something. This isn't a criticism of Dalglish, but I'd love to see what a top class coach would do with a kid like him. Someone who could really teach him how to play as a quality midfielder.

My only concern with him is how much does he really want it? Is he desperate enough to push himself to learn to be a better player? I worry he might be a bit too comfortable in his own ability and skin. If you apply the workrate to what is quite obviously a talented kid, you'll get a player. Be interesting to see how his development goes over the next year or two.


Fair points Ryan. I don't think he lacks determination, I think he has that in spades, which is why it's bewildering why he hasn't figured sooner. I get the point now re 'headless chicken' though, it kind of reminds me of how Gerrard was initially, although he could do all the spade work, off the ball he often lacked the intelligence and with the ball we know he's always tried to 'do it all'. I do think he needs to learn when to be greedy and when not to be, in the last few games he's done well to carry the ball into a good position, with options either side and chose to shoot instead, but that will come with experience. His play for the 2nd goal was more than encouraging, and against an experienced player I've always had alot of time for in Dunn.
 
Jonjo is a leading light amongst the young guns. He needs more game time to improve his decision making but we have the makings a a real playmaker right there!
 
Well yeah 'by the week' is exactly it as i doubt he was gaining too much confidence the week before when he was hauled off at half time at home to a shite Wigan team .

Patience -can you define how long we should wait ? Has the game changed so much that we have to carry an average player until he is 24/25 before he might come good.

I would say in this instance "patience" should at least mean half way into a second season. If a player comes good at 24 then you're going to get his best years.
 
Well yeah 'by the week' is exactly it as i doubt he was gaining too much confidence the week before when he was hauled off at half time at home to a shite Wigan team .

Patience -can you define how long we should wait ? Has the game changed so much that we have to carry an average player until he is 24/25 before he might come good.

I think the game has changed that we clamour for kids to play at the age of 17-19 rather than easing them into the first team at the ages of 21-23 as they did in the past. There were always some exceptions though.
 
I think the game has changed that we clamour for kids to play at the age of 17-19 rather than easing them into the first team at the ages of 21-23 as they did in the past. There were always some exceptions though.

for me to give a young player time is to see flashes of excellence and I've seen that with henderson although the majority of times he has been largly average. I see absolutely no difference in the development of henderson and lucas.
 
for me to give a young player time is to see flashes of excellence and I've seen that with henderson although the majority of times he has been largly average. I see absolutely no difference in the development of henderson and lucas.


It's not what I'm saying though. Players did their development in the reserves in the past. Now there's that many games and mis-management in the game they're thrown in at the deep end which isn't always fair on them physically and mentally. Look at Wenger and AOC. Fans are clamouring for him but he's protecting him and the moment which is the right thing for me and he's good a pretty good record of developing young talent. Same with Sterling. He's 17 but we're already screaming out for him. Just because we're playing badly doesn't mean we should panic and throw a kid in who shows promise. It should be done when they're both physically and mentally ready. Every player is different though, there's no rules to it.
 
It's not what I'm saying though. Players did their development in the reserves in the past. Now there's that many games and mis-management in the game they're thrown in at the deep end which isn't always fair on them physically and mentally. Look at Wenger and AOC. Fans are clamouring for him but he's protecting him and the moment which is the right thing for me and he's good a pretty good record of developing young talent. Same with Sterling. He's 17 but we're already screaming out for him. Just because we're playing badly doesn't mean we should panic and throw a kid in who shows promise. It should be done when they're both physically and mentally ready. Every player is different though, there's no rules to it.

the truth is liverpool have been spoilt with owen, fowler and gerrard. once in a generation player and we got three in the space of 2 decades, now people expect that type of impact from anyone younger then 21. regardless of what ryan would have you believe, lucas was decidedly average but had good technique and he has matured to the point there in 3 games he games he gave a holding midfielder masterclass.
all it took was game time and patience.
 
Development of young players is always a tricky one. People understandably want to see a young player come into the side and be amazing instantly. Sometimes that does happen, but more often it doesn't, and generally even those exceptional young players are far from the finished article.

So you either do throw them in and accept that they will make mistakes and look a bit ropey, or give them a few games here and there, maybe send them on loan for a bit, and let them gain experience that way. There is no set rule that works for every player though sadly.
 
the truth is liverpool have been spoilt with owen, fowler and gerrard. once in a generation player and we got three in the space of 2 decades, now people expect that type of impact from anyone younger then 21. regardless of what ryan would have you believe, lucas was decidedly average but had good technique and he has matured to the point there in 3 games he games he gave a holding midfielder masterclass.
all it took was game time and patience.

But Owen, Fowler and Gerrard are all good examples Neil. Brought in young due to undeniable talent but did that contribute to the many injury problems all suffered ? I don't know, I'm just suggesting it may contribute.
 
In 3 years time I expect to be seing, McLaughlin, Suso, Adorjan, Sterling and Robinson in the first team.
 
But Owen, Fowler and Gerrard are all good examples Neil. Brought in young due to undeniable talent but did that contribute to the many injury problems all suffered ? I don't know, I'm just suggesting it may contribute.

we got lucky to have such talents like many got lucky with their crop of kids. we certainly shouldn't be EXPECTING talent like that out of the gates, much young players have to have their talent natured. I look at henderson and sometimes his vision is fantastic, there has been a couple of times this season he has completely opened up the opposition with a defense splitting ball but at other times he has struggles but he DOES have a years experience under his belt so the expectation of being at a big club wont be as daunting next season.

it's also worth noting that owen, gerrard and fowler grew up at a club with expectation so didn't have to deal with moving clubs when they were introduced, making their transition from reserves to the first team a little smoother but henderson and carroll have had to deal with all this and the expectation of a big club.
 
I think Ryan put it quite well. To be honest a lot of my concern about Shelvey goes back to Gerrard and how he has been at Liverpool during his career. When it comes to central midfielders I am a bit conservative and like the central two to stay goalside and demonstrate a certain discipline, rarely getting ahead of the ball. Gerrard is one of the most amazing players we've ever had but I've always thought he was over-rated as a central midfielder - he's basically a wonderful attacking player but best deployed on the right, in an attacking three or behind a lone front man. I always thought that Gerrard was spoiled a little as a young player and not really developed properly if we really wanted him to be a top class central midfielder. He had many of the same attributes you can see now in Shelvey and I worry that Shelvey could just turn into a less effective version of Gerrard, running all over the shop and getting involved but ultimately in the wrong place when we lose the ball. One of the reasons why I like Henderson more than Shelvey is that as a central midfielder he has many of the instincts that I like to see in a central midfielder - he's extremely conservative and conscious of his own position and that of his team mates at all times. Of course, he's a bit too conservative and risk averse but I'd rather teach him to let go a little than have to teach him discipline, as we're going to have to do with Shelvey.
 
ha ha yeah. Clearly Henderson is that mate you had as a kid who was afraid of everything and wouldn't do anything, wouldn't even leave the street because his Mam told him not to and Shelvey was that mate you sort of had as a kid who would show up now and again, suggest playing in the abandoned chemical factory a few miles away, always and mysteriously showed up with new trainers on and would shit in people's gardens and gob on his chips so he wouldn't have to share them. I remember wanting a friend who was sort of inbetween the two.
 
I think Ryan put it quite well. To be honest a lot of my concern about Shelvey goes back to Gerrard and how he has been at Liverpool during his career. When it comes to central midfielders I am a bit conservative and like the central two to stay goalside and demonstrate a certain discipline, rarely getting ahead of the ball. Gerrard is one of the most amazing players we've ever had but I've always thought he was over-rated as a central midfielder - he's basically a wonderful attacking player but best deployed on the right, in an attacking three or behind a lone front man. I always thought that Gerrard was spoiled a little as a young player and not really developed properly if we really wanted him to be a top class central midfielder. He had many of the same attributes you can see now in Shelvey and I worry that Shelvey could just turn into a less effective version of Gerrard, running all over the shop and getting involved but ultimately in the wrong place when we lose the ball. One of the reasons why I like Henderson more than Shelvey is that as a central midfielder he has many of the instincts that I like to see in a central midfielder - he's extremely conservative and conscious of his own position and that of his team mates at all times. Of course, he's a bit too conservative and risk averse but I'd rather teach him to let go a little than have to teach him discipline, as we're going to have to do with Shelvey.

The thing is, you appear to be talking about ability on the one hand, and attitude/knowledge/experience on the other. You can coach someone on their positioning, tactical awareness, discipline, whatever, but you cannot teach ability to someone who doesn't have it.

Shelvey has ability, but lacks experience, and displays a degree of tactical naivety (although I thought his discipline in the withdrawn role last night was largely excellent). Henderson has discipline and greater experience, but lacks ability.

I know which one I'd rather work with if I was a coach.
 
Well, I'll have to disagree with you there Del. I don't see too much between them in terms of ability and I think it's much harder to teach tactical discipline and acumen. I reckon that for some jobs you also need to have a sort of mindset or predisposition and it can't be taught.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom