And he is a Pikey, so will obviously end up selling Plutonium.
I like players like him. Boys that want the ball, can keep it with their heads up, and who can see things unfolding.
He's got great technical ability, and looks very comfortbale on the ball. His first touch is excellent, and he reads things quite well, but I take your point Gene; he's a bit loose. Maybe loose isn't the word I'm after, but it's as though he doesn't know how to play within a team. That happens quality youngsters that come from the lower leagues - they tend to hold onto it too long, to look for the difficult pass/shot/cross, and to do too much cos they've become accustomed to not wanting to rely on their teammates. Maybe it's just inexperience and naivety, but he needs to be coached how to play a more free-flowing team game, than this no guts no glory approach he has.
I like players like him. Boys that want the ball, can keep it with their heads up, and who can see things unfolding. You work with kids like that cos they've got something. Iron out the kinks and you might really have something. This isn't a criticism of Dalglish, but I'd love to see what a top class coach would do with a kid like him. Someone who could really teach him how to play as a quality midfielder.
My only concern with him is how much does he really want it? Is he desperate enough to push himself to learn to be a better player? I worry he might be a bit too comfortable in his own ability and skin. If you apply the workrate to what is quite obviously a talented kid, you'll get a player. Be interesting to see how his development goes over the next year or two.
The effort made all the difference today.
There was a moment in injury time when we were under the cosh when he won the ball and drilled a super daisy cutter towards the corner flag that demanded our player go after it.
It was a great piece of invention.
Hes got ability and I LOVED how much he wanted the ball and how much he demands to be involved.
He will learn. And then he will have learned. And with that ultimately learning will be learn learned.I thought all our young players were excellent today, except maybe flanno but he will learn and ultimately he will learn.
still think some people are far too eager to bin off johnson, selling johnson would leave us with kelly (who is injury prone) and flanno who very raw.
He will learn. And then he will have learned. And with that ultimately learning will be learn learned.
And then he'll be taught to be learned and schooled to be educated. Before that he was nurtered to be enlightened.learn.
He's got great technical ability, and looks very comfortbale on the ball. His first touch is excellent, and he reads things quite well, but I take your point Gene; he's a bit loose. Maybe loose isn't the word I'm after, but it's as though he doesn't know how to play within a team. That happens quality youngsters that come from the lower leagues - they tend to hold onto it too long, to look for the difficult pass/shot/cross, and to do too much cos they've become accustomed to not wanting to rely on their teammates. Maybe it's just inexperience and naivety, but he needs to be coached how to play a more free-flowing team game, than this no guts no glory approach he has.
I like players like him. Boys that want the ball, can keep it with their heads up, and who can see things unfolding. You work with kids like that cos they've got something. Iron out the kinks and you might really have something. This isn't a criticism of Dalglish, but I'd love to see what a top class coach would do with a kid like him. Someone who could really teach him how to play as a quality midfielder.
My only concern with him is how much does he really want it? Is he desperate enough to push himself to learn to be a better player? I worry he might be a bit too comfortable in his own ability and skin. If you apply the workrate to what is quite obviously a talented kid, you'll get a player. Be interesting to see how his development goes over the next year or two.
Well yeah 'by the week' is exactly it as i doubt he was gaining too much confidence the week before when he was hauled off at half time at home to a shite Wigan team .
Patience -can you define how long we should wait ? Has the game changed so much that we have to carry an average player until he is 24/25 before he might come good.
Well yeah 'by the week' is exactly it as i doubt he was gaining too much confidence the week before when he was hauled off at half time at home to a shite Wigan team .
Patience -can you define how long we should wait ? Has the game changed so much that we have to carry an average player until he is 24/25 before he might come good.
I think the game has changed that we clamour for kids to play at the age of 17-19 rather than easing them into the first team at the ages of 21-23 as they did in the past. There were always some exceptions though.
for me to give a young player time is to see flashes of excellence and I've seen that with henderson although the majority of times he has been largly average. I see absolutely no difference in the development of henderson and lucas.
It's not what I'm saying though. Players did their development in the reserves in the past. Now there's that many games and mis-management in the game they're thrown in at the deep end which isn't always fair on them physically and mentally. Look at Wenger and AOC. Fans are clamouring for him but he's protecting him and the moment which is the right thing for me and he's good a pretty good record of developing young talent. Same with Sterling. He's 17 but we're already screaming out for him. Just because we're playing badly doesn't mean we should panic and throw a kid in who shows promise. It should be done when they're both physically and mentally ready. Every player is different though, there's no rules to it.
the truth is liverpool have been spoilt with owen, fowler and gerrard. once in a generation player and we got three in the space of 2 decades, now people expect that type of impact from anyone younger then 21. regardless of what ryan would have you believe, lucas was decidedly average but had good technique and he has matured to the point there in 3 games he games he gave a holding midfielder masterclass.
all it took was game time and patience.
But Owen, Fowler and Gerrard are all good examples Neil. Brought in young due to undeniable talent but did that contribute to the many injury problems all suffered ? I don't know, I'm just suggesting it may contribute.
Good point spidey
I think Ryan put it quite well. To be honest a lot of my concern about Shelvey goes back to Gerrard and how he has been at Liverpool during his career. When it comes to central midfielders I am a bit conservative and like the central two to stay goalside and demonstrate a certain discipline, rarely getting ahead of the ball. Gerrard is one of the most amazing players we've ever had but I've always thought he was over-rated as a central midfielder - he's basically a wonderful attacking player but best deployed on the right, in an attacking three or behind a lone front man. I always thought that Gerrard was spoiled a little as a young player and not really developed properly if we really wanted him to be a top class central midfielder. He had many of the same attributes you can see now in Shelvey and I worry that Shelvey could just turn into a less effective version of Gerrard, running all over the shop and getting involved but ultimately in the wrong place when we lose the ball. One of the reasons why I like Henderson more than Shelvey is that as a central midfielder he has many of the instincts that I like to see in a central midfielder - he's extremely conservative and conscious of his own position and that of his team mates at all times. Of course, he's a bit too conservative and risk averse but I'd rather teach him to let go a little than have to teach him discipline, as we're going to have to do with Shelvey.