• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

'That Divok Banner'

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think Delinquent is essentially saying that if you're a white cis-het male, if you don't marry someone ethnic, you're essentially part of the problem and probably racist.

On a separate note, I would like to thank his wife for inadvertently providing me with the funniest thread in recent 6CM history.
 
As usual, you're wrong, and have massively over-complicated things. The issue was about whether using a racial stereotype in a banner at a televised football match, and in the nickname for a black football player, was appropriate. Some sensible people said that it wasn't and that it could cause offence, and some ignorant people disagreed. When the sensible people tried to explain why some might find it offensive, the ignorant people got defensive and lashed out. And then a well-known narcissist who works for Rupert Murdoch and is on record as reading The Lying Rag and The Times newspapers every day, showed up and proved, yet again, what a massive cunt he is. And a chauvinist to boot.

In a nutshell.

"Appropriate " is an entirely different conversation to "racist"
 
As usual, you're wrong, and have massively over-complicated things. The issue was about whether using a racial stereotype in a banner at a televised football match, and in the nickname for a black football player, was appropriate. Some sensible people said that it wasn't and that it could cause offence, and some ignorant people disagreed. When the sensible people tried to explain why some might find it offensive, the ignorant people got defensive and lashed out. And then a well-known narcissist who works for Rupert Murdoch and is on record as reading The Lying Rag and The Times newspapers every day, showed up and proved, yet again, what a massive cunt he is. And a chauvinist to boot.

In a nutshell.

No. I'm arguing from the perspective of the actual people involved, and what did happen between them. You're arguing from the perspective of theoretical people you have invented, and then played out what could have happened on the basis of your theory. I understand this game very well because I still am the best god damn scientist in the city.

What you and your wife fail to take into account is if your theoretical people actually existed, by virtue of their existence they will look at what actually happened between people, and not be offended, or realise the offence they felt in the fist place was for no reason. The end. However, the fake news has brainwashed you into taking such a dim view of human intelligence, that you are happy to assume this theoretical offended person is incapable of sussing out what is what and arriving at the correct read of the most basic of situations.
 
No. I'm arguing from the perspective of the actual people involved, and what did happen between them. You're arguing from the perspective of theoretical people you have invented, and then played out what could have happened on the basis of your theory. I understand this game very well because I still am the best god damn scientist in the city.

What you and your wife fail to take into account is if you're theoretical people actually exists, by virtue of their existence they will look at what actually happened between people, and not be offended, or realise the offence they felt in the fist place was for no reason. The end. However, the fake news has brainwashed you into taking such a dim view of human intelligence, that you are happy to assume this theoretical offended person is incapable of sussing out what is what and arriving at the correct read of the most basic of situations.

TL;DR

Delinquent has a small penis
 
Answer me this. If you are happy to accept there was no racism intended or implied by the banner (hopefully you're not so utterly brainwashed as to disagree), then what on god's green earth, what possible mechanism do you suppose, will make any other human being consider that banner propagates a racial stereotype (whatever propagation means in this context). How can something everyone knows is not racist, possibly propagate racism? Explain that to me. I think you can only believe that if you think other people are retarded. Genuinely retarded. Like B4 from star trek retarded. Which if you believe, then guess what, that is far worse than racism. It's humanism. Anti-humanism. Not sure of the nomenclature.
 
Answer me this. If you are happy to accept there was no racism intended or implied by the banner (hopefully you're not so utterly brainwashed as to disagree), then what on god's green earth, what possible mechanism do you suppose, will make any other human being consider than banner propagates a racial stereotype (whatever propagation means in this context). How can something everyone knows is not racist, possibly propagate racism? Explain that to me. I think you can only believe that if you think other people are retarded. Genuinely retarded. Like B4 from star trek retarded. Which if you believe, then guess what, that is far worse than racism. It's humanism. Anti-humanism. Not sure of the nomenclature.

It's very telling that dantes uses an example of a fictional prototype android from Star Trek: The Next Generation as his only highlighted example.
 
As a white male with a big dick I feel offended by some statements in this thread.

Who can I report this to?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom