• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Swingers & swinging...

Oncey's Poll


  • Total voters
    39
[quote author=Delinquent link=topic=24077.msg589568#msg589568 date=1212737336]
Swinging is surely for people who are not fully satisfied with their partners and need something extra to maintain the relationship. I think it is basically an indication that the relationship would not survive without it. Which inevevitably raises questions over a couple's commitment to one another.
[/quote]

Ha ha you would have had a big debate on your hands if you posted that 33 pages ago!
 
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589853#msg589853 date=1212751885]
[quote author=foureyes link=topic=24077.msg589557#msg589557 date=1212736852]
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=24077.msg589516#msg589516 date=1212729499]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589313#msg589313 date=1212691745]
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589230#msg589230 date=1212689250]


The first thing that strikes me when reading through, is the fact that Foureyes, for most of the thread has had to justify/explain why he's offended, like it requires a rationalisation.
[/quote]

Not you too.

Nobody and I mean nobody is questioning his right to be offended. This is about whether or not what was said was racist and it clearly is not.

Anyways back on topic.

Would you swing Anita?
[/quote]

How is a jibe that is based around the cultural background of the target "clearly" NOT racist?

Why can you not understand that you do not get to tell somebody that a racially based comment aimed at them wasn't really racist, even if they took it that way, because they're too thin skinned.

Roger may not be a racist. But his comment was of a racial nature. As Anita said somewhere back there, he wouldn't have used that particular phrase, where 4Is an Italian. So the comment was based around his background. His culture. His RACE.

Therefore...

Question: Were 4Is openly gay, and roger had said "are you gonna throw your handbag at me?" or something similar, would you be arguing the same basic point?

Which is basically that it doesn't matter what you think, just toughen up about it.
[/quote]

Good point. Now if I were to make that jibe at a gay person and they took offence to it, do I really have the right to tell them to shut up and be less sensitive? I don't think so personally. That person may have had the 'handbag' jibe thrown at them constantly for the last 30years or so, so of course they will be offended by it, even though some people may say the comment wasn't that offensive. I'd apologise and accept their point of view. It's not for me to judge what they do or don't find offensive.
[/quote]

F*ck me foureyes!

We have gotten past the whole offensive thing 30 pages ago. Everyone even Rog agrees you could have felt offended and nobody has the right to say you weren't.
This debate is now about racism.

And no way in f*cking hell is it racist to ask a bunch of gays if they are going to throw a handbag.

FFS.
[/quote]

I think you're confusing 'racism' and 'prejudice'. It's best to just leave it alone. It looked like it was fizzling out nicely.
 
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589584#msg589584 date=1212738612]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589159#msg589159 date=1212684308]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589058#msg589058 date=1212678839]
Ok, I don't think it's human nature to base prejudices on race, people may do so depending on their society and upbringing. I do think making judgements on people due to their appearance(height, weight, gestures etc). is inbred in us, whether we even realise them or not.
[/quote]

I think race does come into for alot of people too though from my travels.
[/quote]

I'm sure it does. But it's not natural, it's through social conditioning that people are racist.
[/quote]

I agree.
 
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589860#msg589860 date=1212752075]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589584#msg589584 date=1212738612]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589159#msg589159 date=1212684308]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589058#msg589058 date=1212678839]
Ok, I don't think it's human nature to base prejudices on race, people may do so depending on their society and upbringing. I do think making judgements on people due to their appearance(height, weight, gestures etc). is inbred in us, whether we even realise them or not.
[/quote]

I think race does come into for alot of people too though from my travels.
[/quote]

I'm sure it does. But it's not natural, it's through social conditioning that people are racist.
[/quote]

I agree.


[/quote]

But you said that everyone was racist to a certain degree? Or was that someone else?
 
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589688#msg589688 date=1212745021]
[quote author=Fox link=topic=24077.msg589682#msg589682 date=1212744887]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589675#msg589675 date=1212744531]
[quote author=Fox link=topic=24077.msg589665#msg589665 date=1212744113]
I voted for Ross, with all due respect I think the asian posters on here are too sensitive towards racism as indeed is the whole world.
[/quote]

Haha. I hope that's a joke.
[/quote]

Nope, do you not think its all gone a bit mad Gerry. Genuine racism is a terrible act and should be stamped out, no doubts. But.. some of the racism accusations are over the top IMO.

IMO of course, doesn't have to be yours
[/quote]

Problem is Fox, the likes of you are so arrogant with your ignorance, you wouldn't even realise or recognise a 'terriable act of genuine racism' is it punched you in the face.
[/quote]

Come on Anita I think everyone knows what Fox means.

'terriable act of genuine racism' is hardly asking someone if they throw vegatables.

I really think alot of people do not have to many problems if this stuff causes such a stir.

Yes a real case of Racism is a terrible act. This is not one of them.
 
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589853#msg589853 date=1212751885]
[quote author=foureyes link=topic=24077.msg589557#msg589557 date=1212736852]
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=24077.msg589516#msg589516 date=1212729499]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589313#msg589313 date=1212691745]
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589230#msg589230 date=1212689250]


The first thing that strikes me when reading through, is the fact that Foureyes, for most of the thread has had to justify/explain why he's offended, like it requires a rationalisation.
[/quote]

Not you too.

Nobody and I mean nobody is questioning his right to be offended. This is about whether or not what was said was racist and it clearly is not.

Anyways back on topic.

Would you swing Anita?
[/quote]

How is a jibe that is based around the cultural background of the target "clearly" NOT racist?

Why can you not understand that you do not get to tell somebody that a racially based comment aimed at them wasn't really racist, even if they took it that way, because they're too thin skinned.

Roger may not be a racist. But his comment was of a racial nature. As Anita said somewhere back there, he wouldn't have used that particular phrase, where 4Is an Italian. So the comment was based around his background. His culture. His RACE.

Therefore...

Question: Were 4Is openly gay, and roger had said "are you gonna throw your handbag at me?" or something similar, would you be arguing the same basic point?

Which is basically that it doesn't matter what you think, just toughen up about it.
[/quote]

Good point. Now if I were to make that jibe at a gay person and they took offence to it, do I really have the right to tell them to shut up and be less sensitive? I don't think so personally. That person may have had the 'handbag' jibe thrown at them constantly for the last 30years or so, so of course they will be offended by it, even though some people may say the comment wasn't that offensive. I'd apologise and accept their point of view. It's not for me to judge what they do or don't find offensive.
[/quote]

F*ck me foureyes!

We have gotten past the whole offensive thing 30 pages ago. Everyone even Rog agrees you could have felt offended and nobody has the right to say you weren't.
This debate is now about racism.

And no way in f*cking hell is it racist to ask a bunch of gays if they are going to throw a handbag.

FFS.
[/quote]

mate this is gettin silly. You're just wading in without even reading the fukin post. Where the hell did i say its racist to make comments about gays. For fuks sake
 
DB fuck off trawling through the old pages and picking out posts, you're the reason why this'll have another 5 pages by 5pm tonight! 😉
 
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589861#msg589861 date=1212752229]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589860#msg589860 date=1212752075]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589584#msg589584 date=1212738612]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589159#msg589159 date=1212684308]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589058#msg589058 date=1212678839]
Ok, I don't think it's human nature to base prejudices on race, people may do so depending on their society and upbringing. I do think making judgements on people due to their appearance(height, weight, gestures etc). is inbred in us, whether we even realise them or not.
[/quote]

I think race does come into for alot of people too though from my travels.
[/quote]

I'm sure it does. But it's not natural, it's through social conditioning that people are racist.
[/quote]

I agree.


[/quote]

But you said that everyone was racist to a certain degree? Or was that someone else?
[/quote]

Paddy.
 
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=24077.msg589796#msg589796 date=1212749234]
You're all fucking nuts.

This has to be the most tedious, groundhog day, going round in circles, I'm going to repeat myself again and again and again so I can have the last word pile of shite I've had the misfortune to read on this site.

Fucking shut up and go and shag someone's Mr or Mrs.
[/quote]

Your Mrs was busy last night.
 
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589872#msg589872 date=1212753352]
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=24077.msg589796#msg589796 date=1212749234]
You're all fucking nuts.

This has to be the most tedious, groundhog day, going round in circles, I'm going to repeat myself again and again and again so I can have the last word pile of shite I've had the misfortune to read on this site.

Fucking shut up and go and shag someone's Mr or Mrs.
[/quote]

Your Mrs was busy last night.
[/quote]

Ha
 
[quote author=Delinquent link=topic=24077.msg589831#msg589831 date=1212751013]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589826#msg589826 date=1212750564]
[quote author=Roger REDerer link=topic=24077.msg589396#msg589396 date=1212696977]
I once shagged an Israeli girl in Phuket, Thailand.

You lot are hot.
[/quote]

Isreal's women are indeed very very hot.

How the fuck did this rack up another 5 pages?
[/quote]

I dunno. They're like dogs with a bone.

Or is it Indians with an onion bhagi? I forget......

*runs*
[/quote]

Ha ha *runs after Del dropping Spuds everywhere**
 
[quote author=Delinquent link=topic=24077.msg589844#msg589844 date=1212751636]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589836#msg589836 date=1212751271]
[quote author=Asim link=topic=24077.msg589480#msg589480 date=1212707492]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589323#msg589323 date=1212692242]
[quote author=Asim link=topic=24077.msg589245#msg589245 date=1212689691]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=24077.msg589236#msg589236 date=1212689422]

We've already established that something can't be racist unless it infers that you are inferior on account of your race.
[/quote]

You decided that Ross...not 'we'
[/quote]

So the law counts for nothing.

WTF?

If we do not define what is right or wrong by using our laws what the hell do we use?

[/quote]

I didnt say that, there are many things that are 'law' that I may disagree with DB.
I will abide by it, cos I dont wish to end up in prison etc but I dont agree with everything.
[/quote]

You may not agree with it but in terms of the laws of society which keep everything somewhat together it is correct.
[/quote]

I think you may be opening up another can of worms here. Are you saying that all laws are socially 'correct'?
[/quote]

IMO most are.Or at least the important ones.

If they were not people would vote to change them.

In democratic ones at least!
 
[quote author=Delinquent link=topic=24077.msg589858#msg589858 date=1212752060]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589853#msg589853 date=1212751885]
[quote author=foureyes link=topic=24077.msg589557#msg589557 date=1212736852]
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=24077.msg589516#msg589516 date=1212729499]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589313#msg589313 date=1212691745]
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589230#msg589230 date=1212689250]


The first thing that strikes me when reading through, is the fact that Foureyes, for most of the thread has had to justify/explain why he's offended, like it requires a rationalisation.
[/quote]

Not you too.

Nobody and I mean nobody is questioning his right to be offended. This is about whether or not what was said was racist and it clearly is not.

Anyways back on topic.

Would you swing Anita?
[/quote]

How is a jibe that is based around the cultural background of the target "clearly" NOT racist?

Why can you not understand that you do not get to tell somebody that a racially based comment aimed at them wasn't really racist, even if they took it that way, because they're too thin skinned.

Roger may not be a racist. But his comment was of a racial nature. As Anita said somewhere back there, he wouldn't have used that particular phrase, where 4Is an Italian. So the comment was based around his background. His culture. His RACE.

Therefore...

Question: Were 4Is openly gay, and roger had said "are you gonna throw your handbag at me?" or something similar, would you be arguing the same basic point?

Which is basically that it doesn't matter what you think, just toughen up about it.
[/quote]

Good point. Now if I were to make that jibe at a gay person and they took offence to it, do I really have the right to tell them to shut up and be less sensitive? I don't think so personally. That person may have had the 'handbag' jibe thrown at them constantly for the last 30years or so, so of course they will be offended by it, even though some people may say the comment wasn't that offensive. I'd apologise and accept their point of view. It's not for me to judge what they do or don't find offensive.
[/quote]

F*ck me foureyes!

We have gotten past the whole offensive thing 30 pages ago. Everyone even Rog agrees you could have felt offended and nobody has the right to say you weren't.
This debate is now about racism.

And no way in f*cking hell is it racist to ask a bunch of gays if they are going to throw a handbag.

FFS.
[/quote]

I think you're confusing 'racism' and 'prejudice'. It's best to just leave it alone. It looked like it was fizzling out nicely.
[/quote]

Would it be prejudice yes, racist no.

Yep I think 37 pages is enough.

*Goes off to check Santa Cruz thread*
 
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589861#msg589861 date=1212752229]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589860#msg589860 date=1212752075]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589584#msg589584 date=1212738612]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589159#msg589159 date=1212684308]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589058#msg589058 date=1212678839]
Ok, I don't think it's human nature to base prejudices on race, people may do so depending on their society and upbringing. I do think making judgements on people due to their appearance(height, weight, gestures etc). is inbred in us, whether we even realise them or not.
[/quote]

I think race does come into for alot of people too though from my travels.
[/quote]

I'm sure it does. But it's not natural, it's through social conditioning that people are racist.
[/quote]

I agree.


[/quote]

But you said that everyone was racist to a certain degree? Or was that someone else?
[/quote]

I was wrong, I should have said everyone makes intial judgements with people based on appearance.
 
[quote author=foureyes link=topic=24077.msg589867#msg589867 date=1212752951]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589853#msg589853 date=1212751885]
[quote author=foureyes link=topic=24077.msg589557#msg589557 date=1212736852]
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=24077.msg589516#msg589516 date=1212729499]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589313#msg589313 date=1212691745]
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589230#msg589230 date=1212689250]


The first thing that strikes me when reading through, is the fact that Foureyes, for most of the thread has had to justify/explain why he's offended, like it requires a rationalisation.
[/quote]

Not you too.

Nobody and I mean nobody is questioning his right to be offended. This is about whether or not what was said was racist and it clearly is not.

Anyways back on topic.

Would you swing Anita?
[/quote]

How is a jibe that is based around the cultural background of the target "clearly" NOT racist?

Why can you not understand that you do not get to tell somebody that a racially based comment aimed at them wasn't really racist, even if they took it that way, because they're too thin skinned.

Roger may not be a racist. But his comment was of a racial nature. As Anita said somewhere back there, he wouldn't have used that particular phrase, where 4Is an Italian. So the comment was based around his background. His culture. His RACE.

Therefore...

Question: Were 4Is openly gay, and roger had said "are you gonna throw your handbag at me?" or something similar, would you be arguing the same basic point?

Which is basically that it doesn't matter what you think, just toughen up about it.
[/quote]

Good point. Now if I were to make that jibe at a gay person and they took offence to it, do I really have the right to tell them to shut up and be less sensitive? I don't think so personally. That person may have had the 'handbag' jibe thrown at them constantly for the last 30years or so, so of course they will be offended by it, even though some people may say the comment wasn't that offensive. I'd apologise and accept their point of view. It's not for me to judge what they do or don't find offensive.
[/quote]

F*ck me foureyes!

We have gotten past the whole offensive thing 30 pages ago. Everyone even Rog agrees you could have felt offended and nobody has the right to say you weren't.
This debate is now about racism.

And no way in f*cking hell is it racist to ask a bunch of gays if they are going to throw a handbag.

FFS.
[/quote]

mate this is gettin silly. You're just wading in without even reading the fukin post. Where the hell did i say its racist to make comments about gays. For fuks sake
[/quote]

The point we have been argueing is racism. Whapp made the point that if we made a gay comment would we argue the same point? IE Racism.

And then you replied saying good point which I would take as you agreeing.

Am I wrong?
 
[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=24077.msg589868#msg589868 date=1212752952]
DB fuck off trawling through the old pages and picking out posts, you're the reason why this'll have another 5 pages by 5pm tonight! 😉
[/quote]

Ha ha ha. Ya well I'm starting work now so its all gravy!
 
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589881#msg589881 date=1212753751]
[quote author=foureyes link=topic=24077.msg589867#msg589867 date=1212752951]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589853#msg589853 date=1212751885]
[quote author=foureyes link=topic=24077.msg589557#msg589557 date=1212736852]
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=24077.msg589516#msg589516 date=1212729499]
[quote author=Dreambeliever link=topic=24077.msg589313#msg589313 date=1212691745]
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589230#msg589230 date=1212689250]


The first thing that strikes me when reading through, is the fact that Foureyes, for most of the thread has had to justify/explain why he's offended, like it requires a rationalisation.
[/quote]

Not you too.

Nobody and I mean nobody is questioning his right to be offended. This is about whether or not what was said was racist and it clearly is not.

Anyways back on topic.

Would you swing Anita?
[/quote]

How is a jibe that is based around the cultural background of the target "clearly" NOT racist?

Why can you not understand that you do not get to tell somebody that a racially based comment aimed at them wasn't really racist, even if they took it that way, because they're too thin skinned.

Roger may not be a racist. But his comment was of a racial nature. As Anita said somewhere back there, he wouldn't have used that particular phrase, where 4Is an Italian. So the comment was based around his background. His culture. His RACE.

Therefore...

Question: Were 4Is openly gay, and roger had said "are you gonna throw your handbag at me?" or something similar, would you be arguing the same basic point?

Which is basically that it doesn't matter what you think, just toughen up about it.
[/quote]

Good point. Now if I were to make that jibe at a gay person and they took offence to it, do I really have the right to tell them to shut up and be less sensitive? I don't think so personally. That person may have had the 'handbag' jibe thrown at them constantly for the last 30years or so, so of course they will be offended by it, even though some people may say the comment wasn't that offensive. I'd apologise and accept their point of view. It's not for me to judge what they do or don't find offensive.
[/quote]

F*ck me foureyes!

We have gotten past the whole offensive thing 30 pages ago. Everyone even Rog agrees you could have felt offended and nobody has the right to say you weren't.
This debate is now about racism.

And no way in f*cking hell is it racist to ask a bunch of gays if they are going to throw a handbag.

FFS.
[/quote]

mate this is gettin silly. You're just wading in without even reading the fukin post. Where the hell did i say its racist to make comments about gays. For fuks sake
[/quote]

The point we have been argueing is racism. Whapp made the point that if we made a gay comment would we argue the same point? IE Racism.

And then you replied saying good point which I would take as you agreeing.

Am I wrong?
[/quote]

i think he was just making an analogy with gay people. So yeh i think you have the whole thing confused.
 
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589744#msg589744 date=1212746658]
[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=24077.msg589734#msg589734 date=1212746368]

ER, but it's natural Anita, look around you. Im not saying it's right, nor did I defend it like you said, but literally within any species/race whever they are, you'll see it.

If you weren't the minority, you wouldn't encounter this racial descrimination and whatever that you mentioned earlier in this thread and if you were the majority you wouldn't come across as half as emotionally charged on this subject as you do as a Minority in the UK. No doubt, your a good person and you'd still have strong values on the matter....
[/quote]



Apologies if my initial post was brash HC. But the two points I was trying to make were:

* If something is wrong, I don't think I should accept it. Even if the majority of people are going to persist with it anyway, I still find the need to challenge it. Of 100 people, you might make 1 person think twice: that's still something IMO.

* The last bit of your post. Even if the ignorance is not aimed at me, it's the act of ignorance in itself that would upset me. In all Black/Asian company, I have challenged racism towards white people with the exact same commitment.
[/quote]

I think you're naive.

If you think that your inability to accept prejudice will make the blindest bit of difference you're deluded.

It's human nature to point out differences between race, creed or culture. Just look at the sub-continent for a history lesson.

There are times when you have to go along to get along. A less thin skinned, more humorous outlook would help.

Being indulged by pseudo-intellectual liberals doesn't mean you can have any expectation (and even less rights) to complain and expect results, especially from less sensitive, less educated members of society, of whom there are million in the UK and multi-millions elsewhere.

If you want to make change, use the law. If you want to spend less time being offended, get a sense of humour.
 
[quote author=jexykrodic link=topic=24077.msg589963#msg589963 date=1212758489]
It's human nature to point out differences between race, creed or culture.
[/quote]


It's not human nature to think of people of different races/creeds/culture as inferior. It's social conditioning that does that,
 
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589966#msg589966 date=1212758702]
It's not human nature to think of people of different races/creeds/culture as inferior. It's social conditioning that does that,
[/quote]

He was talking about pointing out differences. Nothing about inferiority.
 
[quote author=jexykrodic link=topic=24077.msg589963#msg589963 date=1212758489]
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589744#msg589744 date=1212746658]
[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=24077.msg589734#msg589734 date=1212746368]

ER, but it's natural Anita, look around you. Im not saying it's right, nor did I defend it like you said, but literally within any species/race whever they are, you'll see it.

If you weren't the minority, you wouldn't encounter this racial descrimination and whatever that you mentioned earlier in this thread and if you were the majority you wouldn't come across as half as emotionally charged on this subject as you do as a Minority in the UK. No doubt, your a good person and you'd still have strong values on the matter....
[/quote]



Apologies if my initial post was brash HC. But the two points I was trying to make were:

* If something is wrong, I don't think I should accept it. Even if the majority of people are going to persist with it anyway, I still find the need to challenge it. Of 100 people, you might make 1 person think twice: that's still something IMO.

* The last bit of your post. Even if the ignorance is not aimed at me, it's the act of ignorance in itself that would upset me. In all Black/Asian company, I have challenged racism towards white people with the exact same commitment.
[/quote]

I think you're naive.

If you think that your inability to accept prejudice will make the blindest bit of difference you're deluded.

It's human nature to point out differences between race, creed or culture. Just look at the sub-continent for a history lesson.

There are times when you have to go along to get along. A less thin skinned, more humorous outlook would help.

Being indulged by pseudo-intellectual liberals doesn't mean you can have any expectation (and even less rights) to complain and expect results, especially from less sensitive, less educated members of society, of whom there are million in the UK and multi-millions elsewhere.

If you want to make change, use the law. If you want to spend less time being offended, get a sense of humour.


[/quote]

I think you've taken my post very literally, as opposed to within the context of this thread.

Clearly, I'm talking aout prejudice that is manifested in treating/percieving a group/individual less favourably.

And as for the less 'cultured' aspect of society you've mentioned, I see it as the role of the enlightened to spread the wisdom, you may not have the same socialist view, fair enough.
 
[quote author=keniget link=topic=24077.msg589970#msg589970 date=1212759008]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589966#msg589966 date=1212758702]
It's not human nature to think of people of different races/creeds/culture as inferior. It's social conditioning that does that,
[/quote]

He was talking about pointing out differences. Nothing about inferiority.
[/quote]

This whole thread is about inferiority caused by comments about race. So I assumed that's what he meant.
 
[quote author=Cassady link=topic=24077.msg589981#msg589981 date=1212759971]

1). Have any of you met up yet for a good old shag?

2). This thread's title needs changing.
[/quote]

Pete tried, but I declined.

He's too thin for my taste.
 
[quote author=jexykrodic link=topic=24077.msg589963#msg589963 date=1212758489]
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589744#msg589744 date=1212746658]
[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=24077.msg589734#msg589734 date=1212746368]

ER, but it's natural Anita, look around you. Im not saying it's right, nor did I defend it like you said, but literally within any species/race whever they are, you'll see it.

If you weren't the minority, you wouldn't encounter this racial descrimination and whatever that you mentioned earlier in this thread and if you were the majority you wouldn't come across as half as emotionally charged on this subject as you do as a Minority in the UK. No doubt, your a good person and you'd still have strong values on the matter....
[/quote]



Apologies if my initial post was brash HC. But the two points I was trying to make were:

* If something is wrong, I don't think I should accept it. Even if the majority of people are going to persist with it anyway, I still find the need to challenge it. Of 100 people, you might make 1 person think twice: that's still something IMO.

* The last bit of your post. Even if the ignorance is not aimed at me, it's the act of ignorance in itself that would upset me. In all Black/Asian company, I have challenged racism towards white people with the exact same commitment.
[/quote]

I think you're naive.

If you think that your inability to accept prejudice will make the blindest bit of difference you're deluded.

It's human nature to point out differences between race, creed or culture. Just look at the sub-continent for a history lesson.

There are times when you have to go along to get along. A less thin skinned, more humorous outlook would help.

Being indulged by pseudo-intellectual liberals doesn't mean you can have any expectation (and even less rights) to complain and expect results, especially from less sensitive, less educated members of society, of whom there are million in the UK and multi-millions elsewhere.

If you want to make change, use the law. If you want to spend less time being offended, get a sense of humour.


[/quote]

Great post imo.

**awaits Andy backlash**
 
[quote author=jexykrodic link=topic=24077.msg589963#msg589963 date=1212758489]
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589744#msg589744 date=1212746658]
[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=24077.msg589734#msg589734 date=1212746368]

ER, but it's natural Anita, look around you. Im not saying it's right, nor did I defend it like you said, but literally within any species/race whever they are, you'll see it.

If you weren't the minority, you wouldn't encounter this racial descrimination and whatever that you mentioned earlier in this thread and if you were the majority you wouldn't come across as half as emotionally charged on this subject as you do as a Minority in the UK. No doubt, your a good person and you'd still have strong values on the matter....
[/quote]



Apologies if my initial post was brash HC. But the two points I was trying to make were:

* If something is wrong, I don't think I should accept it. Even if the majority of people are going to persist with it anyway, I still find the need to challenge it. Of 100 people, you might make 1 person think twice: that's still something IMO.

* The last bit of your post. Even if the ignorance is not aimed at me, it's the act of ignorance in itself that would upset me. In all Black/Asian company, I have challenged racism towards white people with the exact same commitment.
[/quote]

I think you're naive.

If you think that your inability to accept prejudice will make the blindest bit of difference you're deluded.

It's human nature to point out differences between race, creed or culture. Just look at the sub-continent for a history lesson.

There are times when you have to go along to get along. A less thin skinned, more humorous outlook would help.

Being indulged by pseudo-intellectual liberals doesn't mean you can have any expectation (and even less rights) to complain and expect results, especially from less sensitive, less educated members of society, of whom there are million in the UK and multi-millions elsewhere.

If you want to make change, use the law. If you want to spend less time being offended, get a sense of humour.


[/quote]

what a crock of shit. So basically, put up and shut up and laugh along with it. Get real.

i have laugh and a joke with other posters on this site about my colour as do others, but when its aimed as an insult as some others have since agreed, i have a right to take offence. Its attitudes like yours that give folks a reason to feel they can get away with racist remarks and blame people who are offended by it for being too sensitive. Fuk that.

i will gladly laugh and joke about my colour, but when its fired at me in a negative way, no way will i take that. Regardless of what any of you say.
 
[quote author=keniget link=topic=24077.msg589970#msg589970 date=1212759008]
[quote author=Gerry_A_Trick link=topic=24077.msg589966#msg589966 date=1212758702]
It's not human nature to think of people of different races/creeds/culture as inferior. It's social conditioning that does that,
[/quote]

He was talking about pointing out differences. Nothing about inferiority.
[/quote]

If you were better with a calculator than someone else and he said 'of course he's good,that's a Jewish piano'; would that fall under 'different' or 'inferior'?

This is a ridiculous thread; and it has uncovered a lot of feelings which I suspect would have been better left uncovered.

The best we can do is to try to treat everyone as we'd like to be treated; and celebrate what makes us similar; rather than worry about what makes us different.
 
Fuckin' ell people are still arguing over the colour of skin.

Its time to evolve peeps and start seeing beyond the physical body.
 
[quote author=foureyes link=topic=24077.msg590018#msg590018 date=1212762258]
[quote author=jexykrodic link=topic=24077.msg589963#msg589963 date=1212758489]
[quote author=Anita link=topic=24077.msg589744#msg589744 date=1212746658]
[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=24077.msg589734#msg589734 date=1212746368]

ER, but it's natural Anita, look around you. Im not saying it's right, nor did I defend it like you said, but literally within any species/race whever they are, you'll see it.

If you weren't the minority, you wouldn't encounter this racial descrimination and whatever that you mentioned earlier in this thread and if you were the majority you wouldn't come across as half as emotionally charged on this subject as you do as a Minority in the UK. No doubt, your a good person and you'd still have strong values on the matter....
[/quote]



Apologies if my initial post was brash HC. But the two points I was trying to make were:

* If something is wrong, I don't think I should accept it. Even if the majority of people are going to persist with it anyway, I still find the need to challenge it. Of 100 people, you might make 1 person think twice: that's still something IMO.

* The last bit of your post. Even if the ignorance is not aimed at me, it's the act of ignorance in itself that would upset me. In all Black/Asian company, I have challenged racism towards white people with the exact same commitment.
[/quote]

I think you're naive.

If you think that your inability to accept prejudice will make the blindest bit of difference you're deluded.

It's human nature to point out differences between race, creed or culture. Just look at the sub-continent for a history lesson.

There are times when you have to go along to get along. A less thin skinned, more humorous outlook would help.

Being indulged by pseudo-intellectual liberals doesn't mean you can have any expectation (and even less rights) to complain and expect results, especially from less sensitive, less educated members of society, of whom there are million in the UK and multi-millions elsewhere.

If you want to make change, use the law. If you want to spend less time being offended, get a sense of humour.


[/quote]

what a crock of shit. So basically, put up and shut up and laugh along with it. Get real.

i have laugh and a joke with other posters on this site about my colour as do others, but when its aimed as an insult as some others have since agreed, i have a right to take offence. Its attitudes like yours that give folks a reason to feel they can get away with racist remarks and blame people who are offended by it for being too sensitive. Fuk that.

i will gladly laugh and joke about my colour, but when its fired at me in a negative way, no way will i take that. Regardless of what any of you say.
[/quote]

I abhor racism but I learned from an early age that it is ingrained in society and no amount of preaching or 'enlightenment' as Anita puts it will change the views of someone who has grown up with deep-rooted prejudices. Essentially, we are all a product of what has gone before us. It's not just racism either, but lots of things. My dad was (and is) an acutely racist man. Fortuately, I grew up with my mum and only saw my dad a couple of times a year otherwise I'd likely be replicating his views now. Watching my brother constantly arguing with my dad as to the error of his ways was a sad reminder that these views cannot be wiped out with a brief lecture on morals or ethics. He'd been brought up that way. It wasn't his fault. As with many racist people, he didn't even realise he was. It's simply poor education and social conditioning. It was a sad truth but once I accepted it bothered me a lot less.

These days I am never offended by something someone who I care nothing for has said to me. The only people who can hurt me are those that I care for. It is on this basis that I respectfully appreciate your right to be offended but must question why the fuck it bothers you so much? Why spend so much time whinging about something (or someone) you can't change, particularly when that person is generally considered a tool anyway?

It strikes me as a whole lot of wasted effort.
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=24077.msg589543#msg589543 date=1212735554]
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=24077.msg589515#msg589515 date=1212728358]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=24077.msg589205#msg589205 date=1212688106]

Again, it is only a racial slur if it infers that you're inferior because of your race , not if it merely makes reference to your race. Why don't you get this ?

[/quote]

Sweet Jesus.

He doesn't get it because it's wrong, Ross.

Pick any racist slur. Just the word. Let's take the worst one of them all. The N word by itself does not infer inferiority. By your definition, it's ok to use it, because it's only offensive, not racial. And don't throw 'loaded word' at me... That's not mentioned anywhere in the legalese you've shared.

Nor do some of the other slurs that refer to folks of different cultures... Words that start with S or W or any other letter do not alone signify inferiority. BUt they're still as racist at Sheiky's avy.

"You (insert racial slur) prick" does not infer inferiority, so much as the fact that the subject of the sentense is a prick... So, it not really racist then. Except for the racial slur part.

That definition is insane.
[/quote]

No you're misunderstanding it.

Probably deliberately
[/quote]

Not in the slightest, mo chara.

The legal definition you have outlined is bunk, for the reasons that I outline above.

No single word other than "inferior", "lesser", "worse" or any other derivitive implies 'inferiority' by itself. Therefore, using that logic, there's not a single word that, when used alone, could be considered racist.
 
Back
Top Bottom