• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Salary cap proposed

Status
Not open for further replies.
I disagree with introducing a cap but what FIFA can do to limit player greed, and provide some sort of stability would be the following:-

1) Define the period like the transfer window in which players have to extend their contract, so the club does not lose out in future transfer fees, by stalling. If no extension is signed the club should have rights to sell the player, and while he is on sale - he should not have the rights to play games, AND does not get his wages paid either (or on a standared reduced wage in that waiting period that he is not playing).

2) Define rules that restrict all players/thier agents from demanding re-negotiation of their contracts while they are in a contract for X years. Or if that is too harsh then set specific times (e.g. sign on date + x years) before contract re-negotiations are allowed.

3) Ensure that any bids or interest for players is strictly done through a centralized body, possibly the footballing authority in which the player plays in under his current contract - much like a stock exchange. The authority will then inform the club holding that player of the interest from the other club.

I know it sounds very rules based but really the wages thing is something which is against the economic systems of most countries and no other proffession would tolerate it. So the next best thing is to introuce rulings that will bring stability to clubs, and organize a global system that puts rules behind player transfers and contracts.
 
Salary caps (or called something different but performing a similar role) exist in multiple sports across all geographic regions. It seems to be a success in the main.
There are sports in Europe that have salary caps (rugby), so I don't think this is anything that contravenes EU law.
Also, regarding a Salary cap in a league that competes for players, with teams in another league that doesn't have a cap - this already occurs in the Australian Rugby League (NRL). Maybe someone who follows this league can comment on the effects that this has on players drain.

Not sure the NRL is a good example as there aren't many players outside of Australia & NZ in it and I wouldn't have thought there are too many opportunities to
Play it elsewhere - lets see hhmmmm Wigan or the Gold Coast - not really much of a choice.

Rugby Union has salary caps, but the issue there is that you don't get to at international rugby if you don't play in the Super Rugby competition, so players only go overseas at the end of their career.

The A-League operates on a salary cap basis, with provision for one overseas marquee signing and one Aussie marquee signing - but players are only allowed to move within the league if they ate out of contract - although they can move overseas for a fee.
 
have a player registry and have them post up there own availabilty or desire to move and do away completely with agents at least in regard to transfers. If i want a new job I apply for it or am asked to apply there is no reason why as "professionals" footballers cannot do their own negotiation. If required their should be a fully independent advisory service available to help them.... flooding the pockets of a player is one thing flooding the pockets of some greedy shyster in the process is another and causes massive wage inflation.
 
It won't work.

What if Abu dhabi wants to sponsor man c with 1bn (or something like that) so man c could report a growth? Fair play?
 
Salary caps (or called something different but performing a similar role) exist in multiple sports across all geographic regions. It seems to be a success in the main.
There are sports in Europe that have salary caps (rugby), so I don't think this is anything that contravenes EU law.
Also, regarding a Salary cap in a league that competes for players, with teams in another league that doesn't have a cap - this already occurs in the Australian Rugby League (NRL). Maybe someone who follows this league can comment on the effects that this has on players drain.

Not sure the NRL is a good example as there aren't many players outside of Australia & NZ in it and I wouldn't have thought there are too many opportunities to
Play it elsewhere - lets see hhmmmm Wigan or the Gold Coast - not really much of a choice.

Rugby Union has salary caps, but the issue there is that you don't get to at international rugby if you don't play in the Super Rugby competition, so players only go overseas at the end of their career.

The A-League operates on a salary cap basis, with provision for one overseas marquee signing and one Aussie marquee signing - but players are only allowed to move within the league if they are out of contract - although they can move overseas for a fee.
 
It won't work.

What if Abu dhabi wants to sponsor man c with 1bn (or something like that) so man c could report a growth? Fair play?
They already did with the Etihad Campus. Uefa suggest they will investigate anything like that to make sure it 'value for money'.
 
It won't work.

What if Abu dhabi wants to sponsor man c with 1bn (or something like that) so man c could report a growth? Fair play?

What difference would that make to a salary cap? It would exploit a flaw in the current FFP system but it wouldnt help the club get around a salary cap
 
Not sure the NRL is a good example as there aren't many players outside of Australia & NZ in it and I wouldn't have thought there are too many opportunities to
Play it elsewhere - lets see hhmmmm Wigan or the Gold Coast - not really much of a choice.

Rugby Union has salary caps, but the issue there is that you don't get to at international rugby if you don't play in the Super Rugby competition, so players only go overseas at the end of their career.

The A-League operates on a salary cap basis, with provision for one overseas marquee signing and one Aussie marquee signing - but players are only allowed to move within the league if they are out of contract - although they can move overseas for a fee.

I think the Australian RU have introduced the salary cap simply to curb their clubs spending, so they don't go bust. They don't have the money to carry on paying like they are. The cap is due to decrease in value for the first 3 years running.
The cap doesn't apply to SA or NZ teams who can pay as many players as much money as they want.
It means the Aussie clubs will be more solvent but less competitive in the S15, as displayed already this year. The incentive to stay, as you mentioned, is the Wallaby jumper. Or so the ARU hopes, personally doubt it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom