If you’re talking about my list of old attacking players that contributed well in to their 30’s - then Giggs is on it because he’s an attacking player that continued to contribute till well in to his 30’s.
And if we’re going down the road of limiting it to England.
Drogba had his best season in terms of goals at Chelsea aged 31/32 and continued for another 2 seasons.
Aguero was at City til he was 32.
Zola didn’t sign for Chelsea until he was 30 and played for 7 years with his best goal return in his last year aged way over 32.
Jermaine Defoe hit 15 goals twice in a League season for Sunderland aged 33+
Jamie Vardy had 3 seasons of 15+ goals in him from the age of 33.
Even Peter Crouch’s scoring remained consistent until he was 35.
So it’s pure nonsense to suggest that there are no players over the age of 32 that can deliver the goods.
It’s down to whether the player can maintain focus, fitness and is playing in a system that utilises him best.
Aguero was phased out in his last two seasons. If we could afford to have played Salah 30 times this season, and a dozen the next, I'd be fine with it.
Zola didn't play for an elite team, and averaged about 30 starts a season. If our team had similar ambitions and quality, sure we should keep Salah.
Drogba was one of the most physical footballers of all time. At 32 he had more strength than at 26. This one I'll definitely give you, but if Salah was great playing with his back to the goal and great at hold up play, I'd be fine keeping him for a couple more years as well. These are things he isn't good at, at all, despite being strong, because he's spent his entire career using his pace.
Vardy is the best analog, in terms of speed, as the first candidate that actually is a speed player. I'm not sure I'd say that he played for an elite club when he was old, but he won the golden boot, so I'll allow it. His overall contribution to the team toward the end was absolutely nothing other than finishing, on a team that played a counterattacking style. Salah could definitely contribute 15 goals, it's just a question of the cost. He definitely couldn't play Vardy's role though, because he isn't finding the pace to break away anymore and has lost more speed than Vardy. A model for what we should be looking to do though?
Then we are scraping the bottom of the barrel. Peter Crouch? Jermaine Defoe?
Look guys, this brings me no joy. I'm going to physical therapy for my fucking knee. You think I want being old to make you shittier? Sorry, it does. And these handful of questionable examples as a justification? Start thinking of the opposite - players who just got shittier. It's not hard to do. It's not hard to see that he's been shittier either.
Salah could be his own outlier sure, he's certainly got the drive and the professionalism. Perhaps he could be reinvigorated under the right circumstances and a new system of play. A nice indian summer. If he gets some better play around him, the rising tide will lift all boats. He can play a lethal pass, and maybe he can add more to his game. If we can control more games he won't have to defend as much. I don't think it's crazy to think that, it's just an expensive idea.
As I said before this season and before the last, I just don't see Salah being the difference maker, the reason that we succeed or fail. Maybe we can afford to just let him fizzle out with us and have a nice old send off. I don't see him being willing to accept a diminished role, coming on to the cheers and plaudits from time to time, as say an Aguero did his last season.
He could also just be a little worse next year overall after a nice start. That's my guess, and I don't see why its controversial in the least bit, given what he has looked like.