You don't get paid millions of pounds with the specific remit of not taking drugs
I'm a pharmacist. That is actually part of my annual relicensing.
Minus the millions of pounds. Of course.
Last edited:
You don't get paid millions of pounds with the specific remit of not taking drugs
I also find the notion that he failed a drugs test for taking something that isn't on the banned list to be a bit fanciful.
If its not banned they wouldn't test for it.
Best case scenario is he was taking something that he could/ should have gotten a TUE for.
So.... "It was just a fat burn supplement; the fact that it contains the same juice several world class 100m athletes have jacked up on and been banned for is just coincidence" being one, errrrrm, 'defence'?oxilofrine is the rumour.
You reckon Henry is down the canteen spiking the gravy?Since 2009, at least six athletes have been caught taking the drug—most recently Red Sox pitching prospect Michael Kopech.
Hmmm......
Dunno, if it was a stimulant and he was taking non-prescription fat burners from GNC or whatever fitness chains or from the Internet it's quite possible it contained something on the banned list. I remember a big fuss when NHL players joined the Olympics in 1998 because of the widespread use of pseudoephrine nasal decongestant pills in hockey for their stimulant effect.
I'm not sure what EUFA's stance is, whether intent matters when determining guilt and/or punishment or if presence of the substance is sufficient regardless of the circumstances.
My understanding is that it's relatively tough to get a TUE. Certainly "I want my abs to pop" isn't going to get it done.
Therapeutic Use Exemption.What is TUE?
Therapeutic Use Exemption.
Banned Stimulant Oxilofrine Hiding in at Least 14 Supplements - The Daily BeastSince 2009, at least six athletes have been caught taking the drug—most recently Red Sox pitching prospect Michael Kopech.
Hmmm......
If you Google 'oxilofrine fat burner' you'll see its actually a fairly reasonable explanation (or at least a decent excuse to reduce any potential sanction).So.... "It was just a fat burn supplement; the fact that it contains the same juice several world class 100m athletes have jacked up on and been banned for is just coincidence" being one, errrrrm, 'defence'?
The story coming out in the papers now is that Rodgers dropped Sakho at the start of the season for being overweight. He was told he'd be out until he lost a certain amount. That's when he first got into this stuff.
Sounds like a pathetic reason. The dickhead should have just trained 1 hour extra everyday.The story coming out in the papers now is that Rodgers dropped Sakho at the start of the season for being overweight. He was told he'd be out until he lost a certain amount. That's when he first got into this stuff.
Sounds like a pathetic reason. The dickhead should have just trained 1 hour extra everyday.
It is believed Rodgers dropped Sakho against Stoke City and Bournemouth at the start of the season for being overweight. (Andy Hunter)
Sakho has had struggles with his weight at LFC & lost his place at the start of season under Rodgers because of his condition. (Dom King)
Sakho was out of shape when he reported back for pre-season with concerns raised by staff about his diet & lifestyle. (James Pearce)
When the club starts briefing the press like this, I think it is over for Sakho at LFC.
FSG did the same for some of the players and manager at Red Sox whom they wanted out of the club.
Do we not have nutritionists or dieticians at the club?
As a multi -million pound business in his own right he should have been much more careful about anything he takes.
Players are at the club loads and are fed by the club right? just tell the greedy git no seconds.
The info on his weight problems came from someone who rang Rodgers. I don't think the club as such is briefing anyone at the moment.