Sack Race 22/23
- Thread starter bluebell
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Chelsea's results and performances have picked up a bit lately. I reckon Potter will survive this season but he'll defo have to be doing better next time around.
Leicester had a mini-revival themselves a while ago but it didn't last very long. One or two Leicester fans I know seem to apportion the blame about equally between Rodgers and the board for not backing him sufficiently in the market. He's on thin ice right enough.
Leicester had a mini-revival themselves a while ago but it didn't last very long. One or two Leicester fans I know seem to apportion the blame about equally between Rodgers and the board for not backing him sufficiently in the market. He's on thin ice right enough.
Rodgers gone.
Was only a matter of time. Wonder if he'll be able to go after the Spurs job.
Last edited:
Levy wants Nagelsmann in at Tottenham. If that doesn't work out Rodgers could be in the frame, as Levy doesn't seem to want to fetch Pochettino back in.
Would have been 13 if it was anyone other than Klopp at ours.
Nagelsmann is definitely the pick of the available litter. Wonder if his availability will force Chelsea into a move.
Nagelsmann to Chelsea?
Fuck sake. Could they not have held on till Wednesday
Chelsea have sacked manager Graham Potter after less than seven months in charge following Saturday's 2-0 home defeat by Aston Villa.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64205562
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64205562
You've got to think so.
They've named an interim, so I don't think we'll see a new announcement before we play them.
Premier League have to come up with a contingency plan to stop all these sackings, it's not right clubs can sack whenever they want how often they want.
In 6 months they've spent 600m and sacked 2 managers.....they've sacked about 10 managers in the last 11-12 years.
In 6 months they've spent 600m and sacked 2 managers.....they've sacked about 10 managers in the last 11-12 years.
Embarrassing league.
Most of that fortune that Chelsea spent looks appalling business. Obvs, it wasn't Potter who spent it but, still.
I suppose you have to look at the bloke's ambition but, should have stayed at Brighton.
I suppose you have to look at the bloke's ambition but, should have stayed at Brighton.
That's a great shout.
West Ham would be a better landing spot as he'll have more to spend.
Unless there's a pun that I'm getting whooshed with here.
So, Potter to Leicester, Poch to Chelsea, Nagelsman to Spurs.
If Spurs had any nouse, they'd get Poch now.
If Spurs had any nouse, they'd get Poch now.
The thing with this managerial sack race, where's the accountability on the players?
These fuckers have jack-all to do all day apart from online gamble and wipe supermodels off their D.
If they were on £100 a week with a win bonus I'm sure things would be different.
Most of them are cunts.
These fuckers have jack-all to do all day apart from online gamble and wipe supermodels off their D.
If they were on £100 a week with a win bonus I'm sure things would be different.
Most of them are cunts.
No punt intended from my end. I didnt even realize Potter had been sacked when I posted that.
Why? If Chelsea want to go through many managers it's totally upto them, but eventually they'll run out of good managers to appoint.
UEFA needs to put a spending cap on each league, so clubs don't use their wealth to mop up the best talents and the league into a farmers league.
Although it would have been nice to add Potter to our CV of managers sacked after playing us this could work in our favour because no matter who is managing them they won’t have had a chance in 3 days to do anything other than maybe introduce more confusing changes to tactics or sidelined players.
- Status
