It would be, but it would seem just like an accumulation of assets.
How many AMs would that give us - Coutinho, Lallana, Markovic, Ibe, Firmino, Kovacic.
Doesn't make sense. Spend on a striker, and on a DM please.
Or if you had to sign Kovacic, you should have signed him as a CM, and not signed Milner. And if you had to sign Firmino, you should have signed him as a striker, and not signed Ings.
I worry that there's no coherent plan at all. But then we should be used to that by now.
It would be, but it would seem just like an accumulation of assets.
How many AMs would that give us - Coutinho, Lallana, Markovic, Ibe, Firmino, Kovacic.
Doesn't make sense. Spend on a striker, and on a DM please.
Or if you had to sign Kovacic, you should have signed him as a CM, and not signed Milner. And if you had to sign Firmino, you should have signed him as a striker, and not signed Ings.
I worry that there's no coherent plan at all. But then we should be used to that by now.
After Depay, why would United need Firmino?
Looks like we called it right, papers say ManU have agreed to buy him
So do the mancs.We need a defensive midfielder and a striker before thinking about any attacking midfielders.
Weve got about 7 strikers already.We need a defensive midfielder and a striker before thinking about any attacking midfielders.
So do the mancs.
He can't hear youFuck me
Carrick is 42 and Fellaini is their most effective attacking player. They do have Blind but he seems to be needed at LB.they have carrick and fellaini.
Don't worry lads, Rodgers is on his way home to sort this shit out.
Sounds exciting cos he's Brazilian n all, but is he any fucking good?
He would be better if he was called Firminho.
Interest in Kovacic is meant to be hotting up with us and we're getting close to their valuation, with the already having replacements lined up. I don't think we'll get Firmino because I think one of the big guns will be in for him and we won't want to get dragged into a bidding war only to lose out again and look like chumps.