Watching the YT clips, he has the Damien Duff about him
He could be our Scott Sinclair, a bit round round the edges but has the technical ability to be a success with the right coaching.
He could be our Scott Sinclair, a bit round round the edges but has the technical ability to be a success with the right coaching.
I've nothing against a chimp house forum in principle but I think if such a sub forum becomes abusive then the bad feeling will spill over into the main forums. So yes, banter, off topic yes but abusive behavior would still cause issues IMO
Isn't all this being a bit overexaggerated? This place has always had an anarchic streak to it - that's what marks it as much more real and more fun than RAWK etc.
Recently, there's been a lack of news/info going on during a quiet pre-season (ie. no games to chat shit about) and we've a week or two of extra silliness and off-topic tomfoolery. Hardly cause for a massive re-organisation of the site and teeth gnashing.
The season will kick off and we'll all be focused on football again with the odd banter and hissy fit thrown in for good measure. Sixcrazyminutes indeed.
None of this would have happened if we got Rafa instead of Rodgers. Except that Rosco would be on suicide watch.
It doesn't?That makes no sense.
I appreciate that it's proving difficult for the mods to strike a balance between what many of us perceive to be what sixcrazyminutes is all about and what they feel they need to do to preserve order, however it seems to me that when more than a couple of the better posters start to push back it's time for pause. If nothing else, I don't think "fuck off elsewhere" is a particularly constructive attitude to take.
Personally I think the backlash against the 'excessive banter' and so called negativity was taken to ridiculous extremes and certain posters couldn't post anything without being jumped on by others. If the mods are going to try and balance things out then they have to hand out the same sort of treatment to both sides rather than just one.
Won't you feel a bit left out though?
Personally I think the backlash against the 'excessive banter' and so called negativity was taken to ridiculous extremes and certain posters couldn't post anything without being jumped on by others. If the mods are going to try and balance things out then they have to hand out the same sort of treatment to both sides rather than just one.
Lads can we try to keep this thread on topic?
I appreciate that it's proving difficult for the mods to strike a balance between what many of us perceive to be what sixcrazyminutes is all about and what they feel they need to do to preserve order, however it seems to me that when more than a couple of the better posters start to push back it's time for pause. If nothing else, I don't think "fuck off elsewhere" is a particularly constructive attitude to take.
Personally I think the backlash against the 'excessive banter' and so called negativity was taken to ridiculous extremes and certain posters couldn't post anything without being jumped on by others. If the mods are going to try and balance things out then they have to hand out the same sort of treatment to both sides rather than just one.
Until tomorrowThis forum is shit.
Nah, it's awesome.
We all love it, even the ones who have left for a break.
In my opinion, the light moderation you guys do is perfect. It's not SCM if you can't say fuck shit cunt in any thread you like though. I also think it's part of this site's dna to be slightly not safe for work. Your original stance on no hardcore porn was just right in my view.
Everyone on this site should be able to tell other posters to fuck off. And that includes the mods.
Where's Rosco gone then?