RAWK Gobshites

[Squiggles]

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=161305.0

It won't be massive news to anyone, but it's always good to remind yourself what a bunch of fucktards they are.

Take a read.

 

[Leo]

That sig that Red Mike had is quite ironic.

 

[Roopy]

I'm registered but barely ever post on RAWK.

Too many fucking rules to follow.

It's like the North Korea of Liverpool forums.

 

[Leo]

I've had a quick gawk over there.
Just reading the first topic on the list and it's an Arsenal discussion topic.
The last two pages Rafa is mentioned about 30 times.
They're actually mental.
Not in a good way either.

 

[Markeh]

I'm sure some of them have 6 toes

 

[Red Mullet]

I'm sure some of them have 6 toes

They also eat their first born.

 

[SummerOnions]

I'm sure some of them have 6 toes

That's something they're proud of as it's the same number of minutes as istanbul

 

[Molbystwin]

WTF

 

[Roopy]

The forum banner clearly says - SIXCRAZYMINUTES.COM ... with a picture of the players celebrating the penalty shootout win in Istanbul ... BUT WAIT! Is it possible its in reference to 6 minutes at Hillsborough?!

 

[Farkmaster]

I'm registered but barely ever post on RAWK.

Too many fucking rules to follow.

It's like the North Korea of Liverpool forums.

If you have attempted to post, but aren't permanently banned on RAWK, then there's something wrong.

 

[Red Mullet]

Do you think the Rawkites are reading this thread?

*waves at loonies*

 

[tombrown]

The forum banner clearly says - SIXCRAZYMINUTES.COM ... with a picture of the players celebrating the penalty shootout win in Istanbul ... BUT WAIT! Is it possible its in reference to 6 minutes at Hillsborough?!

Easy to scoff at RAWK, but the guy is pointing out the coincidence of 6 minutes at Istanbul vs 6 minutes at Hillsborough, he is not suggesting this site is really a reference to Hillsborough. He may have worded it badly, but it is clear it is not a swipe at this site. LSDL

 

[tombrown]

Oh, and the thread is > 8 years old and has a handful of replies ...

If RAWK dug out a Dreamie thread from 2007 I am sure they could all be justifiably as sanctimonious about the caliber of htis forum as the above are about theirs

 

[cloggypop]

Do you think the Rawkites are reading this thread?

*waves at loonies*

RAWK is a wonderful place. It is by far my favourite LFC forum that I am a member of.*

















*This post is totally unconnected to RAWK staff banning people for what they have written on other sites.

 

[Frogfish]

If you have attempted to post, but aren't permanently banned on RAWK, then there's something wrong.

I couldn't make even one post on there because I was banned as soon as I signed up (years ago). Weird - they must have read something I posted on another site, maybe anti-Lucas or something 😛

 

[Rosco]

It is easy to take a swipe at people on RAWK it's also easy to take a swipe at sad cunts who look up eight year old threads on RAWK too.

 

[gkmacca]

Eight year old threads are probably the latest threads on RAWK. They've locked or deleted all the more recent ones.

 

[Rosco]

We're not far behind

 

[gkmacca]

 

[jexykrodic]

I've been on RAWK loads of times and read plenty without being offended or bemused. I'm sure it has it's grammar Nazis, zealots and sticklers as is the case on most if not all forums. I really don't get the narrative here.

 

[Athens]

I'm tempted to sign up and see what the fuss is all about.

 

[doctor_mac]

I've been on RAWK loads of times and read plenty without being offended or bemused. I'm sure it has it's grammar Nazis, zealots and sticklers as is the case on most if not all forums. I really don't get the narrative here.

You don't know RAWK very well if you don't get the narrative. Why don't you log onto RAWK and slag off Rafa, question the Sons of Shankly, or mention a transfer rumour you've heard? For even greater clarity of the 'narrative' try doing any of the above in a non designated thread.

 

[mark1975]

Or better still, point out that Lucas hasn't always been great and that Jamie Carragher is a legend.

 

[mark1975]

I got booted off and then they pm'd me a sweet farewell. I think I said something nice about Carra or something.

 

[doctor_mac]

I got booted off and then they pm'd me a sweet farewell. I think I said something nice about Carra or something.

Indeed – being positive about Carra was once the sure mark of a troll on RAWK, such was the unorthodoxy of such a view.

Indeed, it is probably best to view RAWK as a religious cult. Certain views on certain topics are heretical, and will not be tolerated.

 

[mark1975]

It's funny, but there's a few posters round these parts who seem to have the same views embedded in them. I wonder if they came from that way? Or are they spies?!!

 

[doctor_mac]

*This post is totally unconnected to RAWK staff banning people for what they have written on other sites.

Is this actually true?

 

[jexykrodic]

You don't know RAWK very well if you don't get the narrative. Why don't you log onto RAWK and slag off Rafa, question the Sons of Shankly, or mention a transfer rumour you've heard? For even greater clarity of the 'narrative' try doing any of the above in a non designated thread.

Do you mean go on the site and deliberately wind them up?

I just read stuff on there, I don't need to be contributing all over.

 

[Rosco]

It's funny, but there's a few posters round these parts who seem to have the same views embedded in them. I wonder if they came from that way? Or are they spies?!!

We need to root them out

 

[cloggypop]

Is this actually true.

Yes.

There were at least a couple banned for saying things on Twitter.