[quote author=Ryan link=topic=37882.msg1014946#msg1014946 date=1260933299]
Honestly Drizzt, I'd actually like to have this conversation with you, but you seem to not have a fucking clue, so that's a problem.
You're suggesting it was fine for Agger to follow Arshavin halfway up the pitch because "zonal marking in open play" allows it.
I'm here to tell you it doesn't, because otherwise you'd have Agger (and everyone else) running all over the fucking park*.
* Don't get me wrong, I'm down with players interchanging, swopping roles, passing on players etc. But this specific Agger issue is not that. He got drawn out of position badly, with no pereciveable cover, leaving us stretched, exposed, and fucked.
[/quote]
Seriously, are you deliberately trying to make me look good, by listing the exact opposite of the principles of zonal marking so I can correct you? Your alternative to pressuring the player on the ball is what to continually back-off until someone has to chop them down from behind or they are in the box? That's exactly what Carragher has been doing all season and it's already cost us far too many goals.
Agger did the right thing, he was closest to the ball, he HAS to pressure. The fact we didn't cover or balance properly is a problem. The fact is we ended up outnumbering them in the box is testament to the fact that there was plenty of cover at the end; there were 3 of our players between the ball and their one player? How is Agger the problem then?
If you want to see a text book example of what happens when you don't pressure players who drop off, watch the 4-4 game. Arshavin time after time dropped off of Carragher who was too scared to pressure him and hence he got the ball in space and scored.
That goal was all about Aurelio, Carragher and Johnson having a chance to clear and failing. Blaming Agger is obviously some kind of agenda crap compounded by ignorance.
Honestly Drizzt, I'd actually like to have this conversation with you, but you seem to not have a fucking clue, so that's a problem.
You're suggesting it was fine for Agger to follow Arshavin halfway up the pitch because "zonal marking in open play" allows it.
I'm here to tell you it doesn't, because otherwise you'd have Agger (and everyone else) running all over the fucking park*.
* Don't get me wrong, I'm down with players interchanging, swopping roles, passing on players etc. But this specific Agger issue is not that. He got drawn out of position badly, with no pereciveable cover, leaving us stretched, exposed, and fucked.
[/quote]
Seriously, are you deliberately trying to make me look good, by listing the exact opposite of the principles of zonal marking so I can correct you? Your alternative to pressuring the player on the ball is what to continually back-off until someone has to chop them down from behind or they are in the box? That's exactly what Carragher has been doing all season and it's already cost us far too many goals.
Agger did the right thing, he was closest to the ball, he HAS to pressure. The fact we didn't cover or balance properly is a problem. The fact is we ended up outnumbering them in the box is testament to the fact that there was plenty of cover at the end; there were 3 of our players between the ball and their one player? How is Agger the problem then?
If you want to see a text book example of what happens when you don't pressure players who drop off, watch the 4-4 game. Arshavin time after time dropped off of Carragher who was too scared to pressure him and hence he got the ball in space and scored.
That goal was all about Aurelio, Carragher and Johnson having a chance to clear and failing. Blaming Agger is obviously some kind of agenda crap compounded by ignorance.