• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

No More transfers..

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, I got that but he's primarily a winger from what I've seen and his strengths are also geared towards playing on the wing.

Well, we won't be buying him as a winger. He wants to play centrally and, if we do happen to sign him, I imagine that's what's would have been discussed. It's why he wants to leave Arsenal in the first place.
 
Well, we won't be buying him as a winger. He wants to play centrally and, if we do happen to sign him, I imagine that's what's would have been discussed. It's why he wants to leave Arsenal in the first place.
If that's the case, then bring him on cause I'm not at all confident that we're gonna keep Coutinho.
 
Most forums are going ape about transfers, Meltdown Monday as someone put it.

I still think there are deals on hold until we have played the 2 Hoffenheim ties. If we are in the Champions League on 24th August we will have a busy week ahead but if we crash out then that could be curtains for us. No pressure then.
 
I would really like a big combative CM (pretty much like everyone else) but where does all this guff about being thin on resources in midfield come from?

Assuming were playing the same way as last year we have 3 spots up for grabs, for which Henderson, Can, Coutinho, Lallana, Grujic and Wijnaldum will all compete. Im not sure were keeping them all happy even with the increased number of games - and that's before we even throw Milner, Ejaria and Wilson into the mix (clearly not likely midfield personnel, but certainly options for cup games).

So isnt it more "not the right type", than "not the right number" of options.
 


Coates was fresh off being awarded the most promising young player of the Copa America tournament as well. Really had high hopes for him then.

And Sahin was a weird one from Rodgers. Seems that the club loaned him in with Rodgers not really knowing which position he was most efficient at (Klopp criticized this too back then

).
 
Thanks for summarizing, and yes we do know that all these players, and plenty more, have been monitored and linked at some stage.

However taking that as proof for how they were ranked at a potential wishlist is unserious. Branding Mane a second choise to Teixeira and Goetze based on newspaper reports on all of them is speculative. Goetze were available for free, and is a versatile forward that could add strength to our forward line. Klopp has worked With him before and thought he could do it again. That doesn't mean he was higher ranked than Mane in who we looked at. They are different players, comes With different packages and add different strengths to the team. One doesn't exclude the other. As for Teixeira, it was reported that we denied spending € 38 Mill on him. Still we spent that sum on Mane. Hence it is at very best pure speculation to say who we wanted more. Klopp has allways been talking about doing business only on right terms, so when paying for Mane at 32 M pounds, and leaving the hunt for Teixeira at the same price it shows that Mane was a first Choice, but Teixeira could have been an alternative at a lower price (but was maybe not for sale at the lower price).

We probably seriously montiored Dahoud, and my Guess is that we haven't completely left him out yet. But he is a long term prospect were Gini comes With PL experience and is a differnt player. Zielinski Ahead of Gini? Specualtive reports from the polish guy and his agent that we have been interested... Hmm I am not sure if they are correct. We would be able to compete With Napoli on salaries, probably outbid them seriously if we really wanted him. Again nothing to bombastic conclude that we ended up With a Third Choice?

Brandt Ahead of Salah? Were is the proof for that? We were linked to him in January or so. But that link just died out and there is nothing saying we actually bid for him. Noone knows how serious that link actually were. And we nailed Down Salah quite early in this window, so there is not much suggesting we had many others on the radar. The Pulisic link is real, but died long ago when he stated he was staying With Dortmund. After Klopp having a full year With this Squad who knows what he felt was right for his wide position? Salah seem very much a early target, and not ranked behind many others.

And so we can look at all dubious links to players, without knowing the motivation behind the link, and Draw bombastic conclussion on how Things work and how we are screwed. It doesn't make it accurate at all. I think Klopp has shown that he is purchasing players he wants, and that he feel can strentghten the team. The Keita and VVD saga's are examples that if he doesn't get who he wants he neccessarily doesn't just buy another guy. Hence that strengthen the argumentation that Mane and Salah is not some kind of third sortiment that we just had to settle with.

Each transfer lives a separate life, and where some rules out others, other will not. But I am damned sure that when Klopp has identified Keita and VVD as the ones he want it is done on a far broader basis than someone sitting behind a computer, looking at youtube, and then being baffled that Klopp and the staff doesn't realize that there are better options out there.

I think most of us were pointing out that there were and will be alternative signings. The reason behind listing the links was not to discuss or argue about which signings would have worked or speak in hindsight but rather to point out that we have moved on from previous targets before.

As @keniget pointed out the TC's work is questionable if they are unable to come out with a comprehensive list of alternatives or find it so difficult to find players who can improve the current squad. That's our, or at least, my main concern. To anyone who suggest/thinks that it's Klopp who insists on those two names only, my reply is the list of queries I raised in my previous post 1-2 page earlier.
 
I think most of us were pointing out that there were and will be alternative signings. The reason behind listing the links was not to discuss or argue about which signings would have worked or speak in hindsight but rather to point out that we have moved on from previous targets before.

As @keniget pointed out the TC's work is questionable if they are unable to come out with a comprehensive list of alternatives or find it so difficult to find players who can improve the current squad. That's our, or at least, my main concern. To anyone who suggest/thinks that it's Klopp who insists on those two names only, my reply is the list of queries I raised in my previous post 1-2 page earlier.

I see that. My point was that a player mentioned as a target for Liverpool is not neccesary a target for Liverpool after all. He might catch our interest, and the interest is leaked to the press from somewhere, and then we have a closer look at him and decides that he ain't something we will spend time on.

When it comes to VVD and Keita it is quite obvious that Klopp have decide don that he really wants them. You don't prepare a world record bid for a defender, or smash the Club record by 100% if they were just to odd alternatives. They are most probably two names that we have decied a all or nothing on. We have failed in our bids (and it is easy to Call us amateurs but the clubs just don't want to sell them) so we will have to reshuffle the mindset and see what we do. Do we find another midfielder covering the same amount of grass or whatever key skill Klopp look for, then I am sure they will be considered.
 
You left out Klopp's challenge :


'Look out there and tell me five that would make us stronger. Five. Then you win a prize. It’s difficult how it is,” said Klopp.'

Thats either complete horseshit or very worrying

It's pretty much how I hear Klopp speak most of the time... mumbled garbage.
 
Most forums are going ape about transfers, Meltdown Monday as someone put it.

I still think there are deals on hold until we have played the 2 Hoffenheim ties. If we are in the Champions League on 24th August we will have a busy week ahead but if we crash out then that could be curtains for us. No pressure then.


Flip side to this argument has already been discussed.
 
I see that. My point was that a player mentioned as a target for Liverpool is not neccesary a target for Liverpool after all. He might catch our interest, and the interest is leaked to the press from somewhere, and then we have a closer look at him and decides that he ain't something we will spend time on.

When it comes to VVD and Keita it is quite obvious that Klopp have decide don that he really wants them. You don't prepare a world record bid for a defender, or smash the Club record by 100% if they were just to odd alternatives. They are most probably two names that we have decied a all or nothing on. We have failed in our bids (and it is easy to Call us amateurs but the clubs just don't want to sell them) so we will have to reshuffle the mindset and see what we do. Do we find another midfielder covering the same amount of grass or whatever key skill Klopp look for, then I am sure they will be considered.
You can't pick and choose which press reports you believe
 
I see that. My point was that a player mentioned as a target for Liverpool is not neccesary a target for Liverpool after all. He might catch our interest, and the interest is leaked to the press from somewhere, and then we have a closer look at him and decides that he ain't something we will spend time on.

When it comes to VVD and Keita it is quite obvious that Klopp have decide don that he really wants them. You don't prepare a world record bid for a defender, or smash the Club record by 100% if they were just to odd alternatives. They are most probably two names that we have decied a all or nothing on. We have failed in our bids (and it is easy to Call us amateurs but the clubs just don't want to sell them) so we will have to reshuffle the mindset and see what we do. Do we find another midfielder covering the same amount of grass or whatever key skill Klopp look for, then I am sure they will be considered.

Which brings us back to my questioning of the TC's work. Were these 2 players only identified as main targets in July? So the TC only works during transfer windows? Are we saying that from the various league across the world and thousands of players there aren't any single player better or suitable? Prepared the bid but no official bidding, why though? It is convenient to point the finger or analysis from Klopp's point of view because the likes of Mike Gordon and Michael Edwards hasn't been mentioned as often in the press. It will be naive to think Klopp has the 100% say in everything relating to transfers.

Anyway, to reiterate my point, its not like Football Manager where you just scout, make a bid, offer a contract and seal the deal. The Sporting Director and TC's work is much more than that and I think it is quite clear the performance hasn't been encouraging.

Sure you can. SoccerItalia revealing sensational stuff on Zielinki is a report you can choose to take with a pinch of salt. While others are more reliable.

Worth noting that there were quotes in Zielinski's case. Anyway I think @Fabio is referring more to how you refer to the press to the advantage of your post/argument. 😛 Is there an official barometer of which tabloid is most accurate?
 
The players himself saying we were negotiating?

The player Saud (again according to a unreliable Source, and I spend a lot of time in Italy so I know the meaning of the Word unreliable!!)

"There is a lot of truth in rumours about Liverpool,” Zielinski told Sportowe Fakty in Poland.
“Jurgen Klopp is interested in me, we had some talks"


This is an Empoli player looking to use the Euro's to find a path away from Empoli. A statement that Klopp has talked to him (God knows in what context they talked... For all we know they met in a football dinner or something were Klopp gave him a compliment). A bit far away from negotiating?
 
The player Saud (again according to a unreliable Source, and I spend a lot of time in Italy so I know the meaning of the Word unreliable!!)

"There is a lot of truth in rumours about Liverpool,” Zielinski told Sportowe Fakty in Poland.
“Jurgen Klopp is interested in me, we had some talks"


This is an Empoli player looking to use the Euro's to find a path away from Empoli. A statement that Klopp has talked to him (God knows in what context they talked... For all we know they met in a football dinner or something were Klopp gave him a compliment). A bit far away from negotiating?
It's also a massive leap to assume at the time of links that there was nothing in it

Perhaps klopp met with Van dijk to see how his family is?
 
Which brings us back to my questioning of the TC's work. Were these 2 players only identified as main targets in July? So the TC only works during transfer windows? Are we saying that from the various league across the world and thousands of players there aren't any single player better or suitable? Prepared the bid but no official bidding, why though? It is convenient to point the finger or analysis from Klopp's point of view because the likes of Mike Gordon and Michael Edwards hasn't been mentioned as often in the press. It will be naive to think Klopp has the 100% say in everything relating to transfers.

Anyway, to reiterate my point, its not like Football Manager where you just scout, make a bid, offer a contract and seal the deal. The Sporting Director and TC's work is much more than that and I think it is quite clear the performance hasn't been encouraging.



Worth noting that there were quotes in Zielinski's case. Anyway I think @Fabio is referring more to how you refer to the press to the advantage of your post/argument. 😛 Is there an official barometer of which tabloid is most accurate?

The TC is dubious. I don't like it at all. As I assume the manager, and his staff which he often describes as parts of him, probably have quite in depth analysis of each player they want. If we i.e. identified lack of goals as a huge challenge a transfer comitee should look at goalscorers like i.e. Lukaku. Maybe even look at the idea of financing the deal. While Klopp and staff would look at Lukaku and see that he never has covered more then 8,5 K pr game in any season (It is a number I made up for the eaxample). Hence for Klopp and staff Lukaku is not the answer to more goals (in this example) as we can't have one player playing different system than the others.

PS Italian Sources are officially bottom of all barometers ;-)
 
Klopp is putting a brave face on it (I hope).

I can't imagine he wanted to be in this position. Perhaps it's just not in his nature to moan to the press a la Rafa, Mourinho and the like.

We've been relatively quiet in the transfer market under Klopp, we finished in the top four and this is the right time (perhaps only time) to try and make the leap with this squad. We all hoped and expected that we would use this window to push on and do what needed to be done.

IF we don't (and history is not on our side) I can't say I'll have much faith left in FSG.
But does he need to be over the board positive and defensive about everything we do. I guess that is his personality. At this tate, when Coutinho leaves and we struggle for replacement, he is going to walk up to the press conference grinning and assure us that Ojo is better than him.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom