New Football Rules from June 1st

Status
Not open for further replies.

6TimesaRed

Not a Bot....
Administrator
The International Football Association Board (IFAB) has published changes to the laws of the game for the 2016/17 season, the most notable altering sending-off offences inside the penalty area and England are set to trial them in their pre-Euro 2016 friendlies.

The previous 'triple-punishment' rule meant that a player who denied a goal-scoring opportunity was automatically red-carded and handed a suspension, as well as giving away a penalty.

However, the law has now changed so that players committing accidental fouls, that deny a goal-scoring opportunity, are not automatically sent off, but cautioned instead.

Players will still be sent off for holding, pulling or pushing, not playing the ball or having no possibility to play the ball, serious foul play, violent conduct or deliberate handball.

Referees' powers have also been extended so that they can send off a player before kick-off, from the official's pre-match pitch inspection onwards. If a player is sent off prior to kick off that player can then be replaced by a substitute so the team can start with 11 players, but they will only have 2 substitute remaining..

Announced in April, the new laws also state the ball will be able to move in any direction from kick-off, rather than only move forward.

Players who are injured by a challenge punishable by a yellow or red card can now have quick treatment on the field, rather than having to leave, which previously gave the offending team temporary numerical advantage.

The IFAB announced last month their intentions to change the laws following a comprehensive, 18-month review, led by former English Premier League referee David Elleray.

The game's law-making body also unanimously approved the revision, which they identified as a 'once in a generation' opportunity to address anomalies and inconsistencies in the laws.

It was recently revealed that England's friendlies leading up to Euro 2016 will be the first games to feature the new laws.

The changes do not come into effect until June 1, however, the Football Association has agreed with their Turkish, Australian and Portuguese counterparts to use them in their friendlies on May 22, 27 and June 2 respectively.

Meanwhile, the IFAB has also approved a two-year trial period of video technology to assist referees, to be used in four cases: to determine if a goal has been scored, red cards, penalties and mistaken identity.
 
Ha, I am. You have to wonder what the next comprehensive review of the rules will yield.
 
They'd have been wiser to have kept the goal scoring opportunity foul rule as it is. Those fouls are usually committed far ahead of the ref, so he's looking from distance at the back of it. To now leave him to judge whether it's an intentional or unintentional foul is to ask for trouble. I'm not even sure what would count as unintentional in that situation anyway.
 
Genuine attempt at a tackle that goes wrong.

Very subjective. Probably brought in so loads of stupid decisions get made and the argument for TV is won. Sorta like what these lizard cunts are doing with the NHS and privatisation
 
Arent they testing video replay in the Bundesliga next season? That will help the ref with those decisions.
 
Arent they testing video replay in the Bundesliga next season? That will help the ref with those decisions.

I don't think that replays help establishing intention. Quite the opposite. People stare at super slo-mo and project about two minutes' deliberation into an action that actually happened in a nano-second. Hence all of that 'he goes down too easily...You can see him thinking he's losing his balance so he's decided to wrap his foot around the opponent's ankle...He's moved away but he's thought he'll just move his arm so it'll hit the ball..' Most of it's bollocks. Video support will help refs to know if contact's been made, stuff like that, but if anything, it'll cloud the issue when it comes to judging accidental and intentional fouls.
 
I only have to see the name "Elleray" to start feeling murderous. That grotesquely overrated ponce really had it in for us when he was still reffing.

Wasn't there some talk of them introducing a rule awarding a goal if the ball is prevented from crossing the line only by a clearly intentional handball?
 
I don't think that replays help establishing intention. Quite the opposite. People stare at super slo-mo and project about two minutes' deliberation into an action that actually happened in a nano-second. Hence all of that 'he goes down too easily...You can see him thinking he's losing his balance so he's decided to wrap his foot around the opponent's ankle...He's moved away but he's thought he'll just move his arm so it'll hit the ball..' Most of it's bollocks. Video support will help refs to know if contact's been made, stuff like that, but if anything, it'll cloud the issue when it comes to judging accidental and intentional fouls.

It will also help with wronlgy given onside/offside goals and penalty decisions.
Intention is as you say maybe difficult to spot but it could also help in a lot of situations.
I'd rather the technology is introduced than not.
 
It will also help with wronlgy given onside/offside goals and penalty decisions.
Intention is as you say maybe difficult to spot but it could also help in a lot of situations.
I'd rather the technology is introduced than not.

Me too.
 
They'd have been wiser to have kept the goal scoring opportunity foul rule as it is. Those fouls are usually committed far ahead of the ref, so he's looking from distance at the back of it. To now leave him to judge whether it's an intentional or unintentional foul is to ask for trouble. I'm not even sure what would count as unintentional in that situation anyway.


You'd like to think in that situation one of the other 3/5 officials around the pitch could catch it. If not it'll be fine in the next year or so when video comes in.
 
I couldn't get the kick off rule until my son pointed out you would only need to have one player at the center spot, so maybe, just maybe, it gives a slightly higher possibility of going straight on the attack. Cant wait til next season to see how that pans out
 
You'd like to think in that situation one of the other 3/5 officials around the pitch could catch it. If not it'll be fine in the next year or so when video comes in.

I'm not sure either will help. I've already said video is rarely that enlightening on that count, and even if assistants see an incident better, at high speed, it would surely have to be really obvious before they'll commit a decision either way. I'm not even sure the distinction makes much sense in that last man context. If anything I guess it will suggest to players that they will escape a red card unless they're incredibly blatant, which would hardly be an improvement,
 
I don't see why they're changing the triple punishment one. A foul is a foul anywhere else on the pitch regardless of intent. Why should the rule be any different when denying a certain goal scoring opportunity? It's just another step in the "lack of consistency" route.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom