I wasn't happy that Owen left us and the circumstances of his departure were particularly disappointing. However, wasn't his decision (or at least the decision taken by those advising him), exactly the same as that taken by Keegan, Rush and McManaman to name but three before him? And didn't he also do exactly what Barnes and Gerrard considered doing at various stages of their Liverpool careers (in fact, wouldn't Gerrard to Chelsea have been an even more unforgivable sin?)
I have wondered if many people would have a slightly different opinion of Owen today if we hadn't won the European Cup at the end of the season in which he left us. Didn't winning that numb much of the pain of losing a worldclass striker? And therefore if we hadn't won it, wouldn't we have had cause to regret his departure all the more?
When Owen left us, he was a worldclass striker and in the limited opportunities he had in Spain I think he did enough to confirm he hadn't lost that status. Michael Owen didn't choose Newcastle, he was left with Newcastle. And to a point, I actually feel quite sorry for him tonight. The club he wants to be at doesn't want him. The club he is at has just been relegated and they can probably no longer afford him. Since the age of 18, he was destined to become England's record goalscorer. Not anymore. What would he be now, 7th or 8th choice for his country, at best?
Michael Owen left Liverpool because he wanted to further his career and his income and he thought he could best do that away from the Liverpool team of the time. He was wrong and most of us on here, myself included, would probably claim we could never do what he did as we could never turn our backs on Liverpool. But he did and he's probably regretted it ever since.
If he is back on the market again, I still maintain we could do far worse (although it's unlikely, I know). Get him fit and motivated again and Michael Owen is still a quality footballer.