• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Manchester City fined and squad capped for FFP breach

Status
Not open for further replies.

WhyAlwaysMe?

Active
Member
Manchester City have been fined £49m, £32m of which is suspended, and can only name a 21-man Champions League squad next season after failing Uefa financial fair play rules.

The Premier League champions have agreed to "significantly limit" transfer spending for the next two years in a settlement with Europe's governing body.


Good.

social-justice.312132658_std.jpg
 
£18m fine + 4 less hangers on in the CL after spending £300m and buying the League

Big chunks
 
Manchester City fined and squad capped for FFP breach
Manchester City have been fined £49m, £32m of which is suspended, and can only name a 21-man Champions League squad next season after failing Uefa financial fair play rules.
Another sanction means City can only spend £49m on players this summer, as well as any transfer fees they receive.
And their wage bill for 2014-15 must stay the same as this season.
What is financial fair play?

• The Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) was set up in June 2012 to oversee the application of the Uefa Club Licensing System and Financial Fair Play Regulations
• Clubs cannot repeatedly spend more than their generated revenues, and clubs will be obliged to meet all their transfer and employee payment commitments at all times
• Higher-risk clubs that fail certain indicators will also be required to provide budgets detailing their strategic plans
• Teams participating in Uefa club competitions have had their transfer and employee payables monitored since the summer of 2011. The break-even assessment covering the financial years ending 2012 and 2013 will be assessed during 2013-14
Paris St-Germain, one of eight other teams to breach the rules, have been handed a similar fine and cap as City.
A City statement said that they only fielded 21 players in the Champions League this season, were not planning to spend a net amount of more than £49m on players this summer and expected their wage bill to be lower next season anyway.
"At the heart of discussions is a fundamental disagreement between the club's and Uefa's respective interpretations of the FFP regulations on players purchased before 2010," it read.
"The club believes it has complied with the FFP regulations on this and all other matters.
"In normal circumstances, the club would wish to pursue its case and present its position through every avenue of recourse. However, our decision to do so must be balanced against the practical realities for our fans, for our partners and in the interests of the commercial operations of the club."
It added: "The nature of conditions that will result in the lifting of sanctions means that the club expects to be operating without sanction or restriction at the commencement of the 2015-16 season.
"Importantly all non-financial sanctions agreed to would have been complied with as a natural course of the Club's planned business operations."
Clubs who breached the rules had to reach a deal with Uefa, which City have done, or else take it to an adjudicatory panel in June.
Uefa makes first FFP ruling

Uefa made its first FFP ruling based on club accounts from the past two seasons - 2011-12 and 2012-13.
Under this monitoring period, total losses of €45m (£37m) are permitted as long as clubs have owners who can cover such amounts.
The other clubs guilty of breaking the rules were Russian sides Zenit St Petersburg, Rubin Kazan and Anzhi Makhachkala, Turkish clubs Galatasaray, Bursaspor and Trabzonspor and Bulgarian club Levski Sofia.
City posted combined losses of almost £149m for the past two seasons - £97m in 2012 and £51.6m in 2013.
Uefa introduced FFP because it fears many clubs are risking their futures by spending beyond their means, while Uefa president Michel Platini also believes the big spending of some clubs is ruining the game.
PSG's failure to adhere to FFP is understood to stem from the club's controversial contract with the Qatar Tourism Authority.
The contract is said to have been ruled as valid by Uefa but the overall value of the deal - worth up to £165m per year - has been deemed excessive.
PSG are also understood to have argued with Uefa that French income tax levels in France made complying with FFP that much tougher.
Sources close to the club say that, over a three-year period, they will pay £163.9m more in wages than an equivalent club based in Germany because of taxation.
Uefa ultimately rejected the club's argument that they have to pay higher gross salaries to attract and keep their star players.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27445475
 
holy cow, can't believe it. However Platini has bottled it with PSG and in my opinion their back dated humongous sponsorship deal was blatantly taking the piss out of FFP
 
That'll teach them, what a whopping punishment. They'll not do that again.
Until they start dishing out proper punishments, these teams will continue to spend 100mill every summer.
 
so city only have a budget of £49 million plus sales, poor guys


But that's probably half what they would have spent, plus no increase in wages. The City supporters I know expected their enormously well payed lawyers to tell UEFA where to go, and it's much harsher than I expected.
 
It is, but it's pretty much a drop in an ocean really, they can sell a fair few players this Summer to top up £49m, that's still alot to compound an already heavily talented squad.
 
But that's probably half what they would have spent, plus no increase in wages. The City supporters I know expected their enormously well payed lawyers to tell UEFA where to go, and it's much harsher than I expected.


They could do with missing a couple of windows and making do with their current squad though.

Nobody seems to come through their youth setup and they stockpile English players they don't really intend to play so they make up the numbers for the home grown rule. Maybe a year out of the market would have them looking within their current playing staff for solutions.
 
They'd have been looking to make 1 marquee forward signing that'd take up most, if not all of that of that figure. That means they'll have to find a lot of cash to buy the players they've been linked with
 
Melbourne Heart or some other club they own or hold an interest in will probably start signing fringe players for tens of millions to get around it.
 
Waiting for City to announce a brand new sponsorship deal with an Arab company no-one has ever heard of worth 100 million plus per season.
 
It is a shot across the bows for us though. With our losses the past few seasons, we could run foul of the FFP rules ourselves at the end of next season (we dodged it for this coming CL as we were not in Europe). It's why I regard rumours of our supposed much larger transfer budget with some caution as I'm unsure where we stand in terms of our profit/loss for next season, even with the increased revenue stream from this season.
 
It is a shot across the bows for us though. With our losses the past few seasons, we could run foul of the FFP rules ourselves at the end of next season (we dodged it for this coming CL as we were not in Europe). It's why I regard rumours of our supposed much larger transfer budget with some caution as I'm unsure where we stand in terms of our profit/loss for next season, even with the increased revenue stream from this season.

I don't think it's an issue at all for us with nearly 100M from the PL alone, new sponsorship deals coming in this and next season, the new TV deal and the CL money, and probably why we can spend big this Summer.
 
Justice????? Hardly. Suspended fine, any fines are irrelevant to clubs like city with bottomless pockets. 21 players, they've only used 21 in past seasons, so hardly a punishment. Uefa have bottled it. These clubs should be banned from competitions
 
I think they've missed a trick big time.

Everyone said they can't ban teams cos they'll lose too much from their own competition, however the first two offenders in PSG & City would be the ideal example, cos neither have the worldwide fan base to create a huge headache for them & it'd send a clear message.
 
Apparently the fine can be paid by the owner rather than the club accounts, which makes a mockery of the 'punishment'.
 
But that's probably half what they would have spent, plus no increase in wages. The City supporters I know expected their enormously well payed lawyers to tell UEFA where to go, and it's much harsher than I expected.

The wage restriction does not include performance related bonuses, so any decent accountant could sidestep that. Basically its a slap on the wrist and I guess City are far more concerned with the damage to the image they are trying to promote than this supposed " punishment "
 
Worth noting too that an unlimited no. of players is available for the List B squad (i.e. players under 21 and have been eligible to play for the club for any uninterrupted period of two years since their 15th birthday)

Registered 24 men last season and used 21, 1 of whom (Rodwell) played in only 1 match.

Hart, Pantilimon, Johansen, Zabaleta, Richards, Kompany, Demichelis, Boyata, Nastasic, Lescott, Clichy, Kolarov, Fernandinho, Rodwell, Toure, Garcia, Navas, Milner, Silva, Nasri, Aguero, Jovetic, Negredo, Dzeko.
 
It doesn't matter now anyway. Chelsea, City and PSG have already established themselves. It's too late on that front.

As for the punishment, it's still better than anyone was expecting.
 
Elsewhere...
[article=http://www.marca.com/2014/05/18/en/football/international_football/1400438147.html]The PSG Chairman ruled out Edinson Cavani's transfer, in spite of the player's unhappiness with his position on the pitch.

As for the UEFA sanction, which prevents PSG from spending more than €60 million on signings on account of their breaking Fair Play finance regulations, Al-Khelaifi was adamant this wouldn't hold them back.

"We'll sign whoever we want. We've already got a great team, we don't need much more, but we'll look at where we can improve. No-one will stop us. I'll have the players that I want. How? That's our business," he said.[/article]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom