• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Lukaku's Giant Penis Terrace Chant Is Racist

Forums Unread posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Marina Hyde is an aristocrat. Her dad is a knight and she's been given her entire life on a plate. Not that it makes her opinion worthless.
 
Hang on - Am I missing something? What the fuck is wrong with the Guardian? I usually buy it on a Saturday. I like the Ottelengi columns.
 
manwithnoname said:
Unsurprisingly, the ever-tedious Guardian agrees:
Click to expand...
For standard news reporting, I don't mind the guardian, quite enjoy a few of their pieces, but by christ the about of bullshit articles they post to Facebook of women justifying why it's not just okay, but a good thing that they fuck multiple guys that aren't their husband whilst he remains faithful to them "accepting her needs". Had to block them, occasional good pieces buried knee deep in the bullshit self congratulatory delusions of selfish whores.
 
Also, this chant, it's a bit too specific for my tastes. His bellends between his toes? A bit of a weird thing to sing if you ask me.
 
dantes said:
Those old white men have made it such that racism isn't a tangible thing. The thing in the rules is actually abusive language. Racism is at best a subset of that, a minor additional detail which can aggrevate the more important and actual thing which is the use of abusive words. It's absurd and makes it impossible for a person to be racist because no such thing exists. Fine. In fact it's more than fine as it was Kick It Out along with the papers who all enabled that absurd interpretation in their pathetic attempt to lynch Suarez.

Now all of a sudden they want to examine the meaning of words to infer what people think and what effect it can have. No, that ain't how football rolls so they should just go and fuck themselves.
Click to expand...
I can see that the humanities aren't your thing, but I really think they could help you here.
 
Delinquent said:
I can see that the humanities aren't your thing, but I really think they could help you here.
Click to expand...

I don't get the joke or understand what you're telling me. Hahahahahaha this is a first, I have no idea what is funny or why people liked this and laughed at it. I couldn't be happier with my brain right now.
 
Earlier today on TalkSh!te that pr!ck Jim White was in full Right-On mode about this, with his studio guests (whoever they were) lining up right behind him. A black guy phoned up to say neither he nor his black friends saw this as any big deal, only to be harried off the air by a studio full of white guys who thought they knew better than the black caller whether or not he should be offended. This would have been material for a comedy sketch once. The Thought Police have well and truly arrived.
 
A few years ago, a scientist produced a paper explaining the physiological reasons why black men and women were better sprinters than Caucasians. This was attacked by the race relations industry, who said that there was no physiological difference between blacks and whites. The reason for this was that if you accepted that black people were better at one thing, that opened the door to claims that they were worse at other things.
 
Portly said:
A few years ago, a scientist produced a paper explaining the physiological reasons why black men and women were better sprinters than Caucasians. This was attacked by the race relations industry, who said that there was no physiological difference between blacks and whites. The reason for this was that if you accepted that black people were better at one thing, that opened the door to claims that they were worse at other things.
Click to expand...

Everyone (at least everyone at the Guardian editorial board) knows that the fact that Kenyans have won every major marathon in living memory is nothing more than a bizarre string of coincidences.
 
Last edited:
Portly said:
A few years ago, a scientist produced a paper explaining the physiological reasons why black men and women were better sprinters than Caucasians. This was attacked by the race relations industry, who said that there was no physiological difference between blacks and whites. The reason for this was that if you accepted that black people were better at one thing, that opened the door to claims that they were worse at other things.
Click to expand...
That’s crazy. Physiological advantage = mental disadvantage? But that would be easily disproven by the number of top academics of diverse ethnicity throughout the world. Yet how many sprinters, white or Asian, have won Olympic gold medals in 200 or 100 meters in the last half century? Have there been any?
Here in Japan, it’s accepted and is a 100% given that Asians are at a disadvantage physically from the word go, and so lots of top athletes go for the technical sports from an early age as opposed to pure physical superiority contests. I can’t see how that’s wrong.
Not arguing against you of course! Just the bollocks objection to the study.
 
Rosco said:
Marina Hyde wrote the article
Click to expand...

I think it's wrong that she's sexualising men and reinforcing the stereotype that men have penises. Maybe he was asking for it because he was wearing shorts was he Marina? And how dare she assume his gender. Disgusting.
 
juniormember said:
That’s crazy. Physiological advantage = mental disadvantage? But that would be easily disproven by the number of top academics of diverse ethnicity throughout the world. Yet how many sprinters, white or Asian, have won Olympic gold medals in 200 or 100 meters in the last half century? Have there been any?
Here in Japan, it’s accepted and is a 100% given that Asians are at a disadvantage physically from the word go, and so lots of top athletes go for the technical sports from an early age as opposed to pure physical superiority contests. I can’t see how that’s wrong.
Not arguing against you of course! Just the bollocks objection to the study.
Click to expand...

Valery Borzov and Alan Wells. In all fairness the latter probably because USA boycotted the games
 
I thought it was to do with blacks having more fast twitch muscles and calves being positioned higher up their legs (most blacks have shit calves) and higher centre of gravity.
 
Portly said:
A few years ago, a scientist produced a paper explaining the physiological reasons why black men and women were better sprinters than Caucasians. This was attacked by the race relations industry, who said that there was no physiological difference between blacks and whites. The reason for this was that if you accepted that black people were better at one thing, that opened the door to claims that they were worse at other things.
Click to expand...

518ARhiy-UL._SX332_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


How courageous from football fans to finally break the silence about this
 
I guess Marina Hyde hasn't spent much time viewing blacked.com
 
Glen C said:
I thought it was to do with blacks having more fast twitch muscles and calves being positioned higher up their legs (most blacks have shit calves) and higher centre of gravity.
Click to expand...

Well, there should be a considerable difference then in muscle characteristics between East/West Africans. The former are pretty shit sprinters but dominate endurance contests.

I guess The Guardian is not the place for a comparative cock size study for another possible underlying mechanism
 
50 shades of red said:
Well, there should be a considerable difference then in muscle characteristics between East/West Africans. The former are pretty shit sprinters but dominate endurance contests.
Click to expand...

The record-breaking Kenyan distance runners come from a particular area of Kenya, the home of the Kalenjin tribe. A few years ago, there was a Kenyan studying at an American university who wasn't interested in running. Some friends realised that he originated from that tribe and ought to be a good runner. They persuaded him to take part in running competitions, and he was soon winning medals galore!

There seems to be a feeling about that it is somehow racist to enter into this kind of discussion. My own opinion is that if it is true, what is the harm in talking about it?
 
Last edited:
manwithnoname said:
Romelu Lukaku
He's our Belgium scoring genius
He's got a 24inch penis
Scoring all the goals
bellend to his toes

To the tune of "Made Of Stone" by The Stone Roses

This has been reported by "Kick It Out" to the FA and the club, as it is a racist stereotype and unacceptable.

Unsurprisingly, the ever-tedious Guardian agrees:

"The song about Romelu Lukaku’s penis is not just ‘banter’ because the trouble with supposedly positive stereotypes is that they tend to be accompanied in the minds of those who hold them by distinctly less complimentary ones.

And so with the Lukaku chant. I’m afraid we have to ask ourselves something about those Manchester United fans chanting their great big compliment at Lukaku: what’s the likelihood that the only stereotype those people hold about black people is that they have enormous penises? Honestly, what are the chances? Zero, is the answer to that, whether or not they even realise it."
Click to expand...

Kick it out and Guardian makes it racist in the exakt moment they report that it as racist.
Not the song.
 
When it comes to racism isn't intention irrelevant?

I.e. If people are offended that's enough grounds for it to be considered so?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

localny
    • Like
  • Locked
Pepe Reina on the verge of Retiring at 41
Replies
15
Views
1K
Judge Jules
Judge Jules
Red rose
  • Locked
Is Elliott the secret weapon about to explode ?
2 3 4 5
Replies
123
Views
10K
localny
localny
Hansern
  • Locked
I hear You’re a racist now, Chelsea
Replies
20
Views
2K
dantes
dantes
the count
    • Like
  • Locked
Boring Richey Rich!
Replies
22
Views
2K
the count
the count
the count
    • Like
  • Locked
In memory of @gkMacca
Replies
21
Views
2K
Roopy
Roopy
Back
Top Bottom