S
Squiggles
Guest
[quote author=LarkLaner link=topic=46714.msg1393453#msg1393453 date=1314971876]
While we're on the subject of justifying the Carroll transfer fee...
An interesting thing, which I'm sure went largely unnoticed, occurred on Wednesday night as *adopts Jim White pose* the transfer window slammed shut. 30 1/2 year old Peter Crouch moved from Tottenham to Stoke City for £12m plus signing on fees/agents fees etc. The same Peter Crouch who has his best years behind him, will soon be entering the twighlight of his career and can surely not be looked upon as providing any more than 3yrs service of any worth at Stoke, after which he will have little or no residual value.
If Crouchie is deemed to be a £12m man then surely Carroll looks good value at £35m given his near 10 year age advantage over Crouch, his greater potential and residual value, which no matter what dips in forms he has will never drop below £15-20m over the next few years.
[/quote]
'It's okay lads, Stoke have fucked up too! Not to worry'.
While we're on the subject of justifying the Carroll transfer fee...
An interesting thing, which I'm sure went largely unnoticed, occurred on Wednesday night as *adopts Jim White pose* the transfer window slammed shut. 30 1/2 year old Peter Crouch moved from Tottenham to Stoke City for £12m plus signing on fees/agents fees etc. The same Peter Crouch who has his best years behind him, will soon be entering the twighlight of his career and can surely not be looked upon as providing any more than 3yrs service of any worth at Stoke, after which he will have little or no residual value.
If Crouchie is deemed to be a £12m man then surely Carroll looks good value at £35m given his near 10 year age advantage over Crouch, his greater potential and residual value, which no matter what dips in forms he has will never drop below £15-20m over the next few years.
[/quote]
'It's okay lads, Stoke have fucked up too! Not to worry'.