• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Klopp's hamstring

Status
Not open for further replies.
The FA must be pretty confident about what was said during that exchange between Tierney and Klopp for them to release it.
That doesnt sound particularly good for us, and Klopp.

He'll probably get a ban for more than one game..
 
Martin Cassidey should shut the fuck up! Klopp will get fined and banished from the touchlines, giving a team point deduction is moronic. Cassidy a so called Liverpool fan should be banned from any home games at Anfield, that would shut the Mong up
[article]
A fine is nothing. Start giving points deductions and watch them shut up and behave': CEO of referee charity demands Liverpool are punished after Jurgen Klopp's furious outburst at Paul Tierney

  • Klopp accused Tierney of having an agenda against Liverpool in win over Spurs
  • The German was booked for his over-zealous celebration in front of John Brooks
  • Martin Cassidy believes Liverpool should now be given a points deduction
By JONATHAN ROSE FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 10:15, 2 May 2023 | UPDATED: 11:27, 2 May 2023

91
View comments

The CEO of Ref Support UK has demanded that Liverpool are punished by the Premier League with a points deduction.
Jurgen Klopp is set to be charged by the FA after he accused Paul Tierney of having an agenda against the Reds following their dramatic 4-3 win over Tottenham.

[/article]
 
Tierney had a few opportunities he could have "hurt" Liverpool yesterday. On top of a possible red for Jota, there was the Konate/Richarlson penalty claims he brushed aside. If Jota had marching orders, the 4th goal wasn't likely to come from us.
Tierney booked Robertson for the assistant ref Elbowing him

Gave a free kick against salah when salah was clearly the one who was fouled which led to the spurs equaliser and you could easily say that even if jota was sent off we should still have been leading 3-2. Always find it funny that people always look at scenarios that would have happened later in games and add them to stuff that actually happened after that incident like they would still have happened.
 
It was cringeworthy from Klopp, and I'm not overly arsed if he has to sit in the stands as a result, TBH. You might understand his actions in a high-stakes game where we had been particularly aggrieved, but neither really applied.
 
I dont agree. I can understand why he is showing this type of emotion and in all honesty he didnt even make it to the 4th official.
He should have said, as he pointed out today, what Tierney actually said to him.
 
Masterstroke by Klopp imo. He has been getting all sorts of stick from the press. Now he has revealed what he heard, while the PGMOL didn't. Now everyone can judge whether Tierney is biased or not.
 
Martin Cassidey should shut the fuck up! Klopp will get fined and banished from the touchlines, giving a team point deduction is moronic. Cassidy a so called Liverpool fan should be banned from any home games at Anfield, that would shut the Mong up
[article]
A fine is nothing. Start giving points deductions and watch them shut up and behave': CEO of referee charity demands Liverpool are punished after Jurgen Klopp's furious outburst at Paul Tierney

  • Klopp accused Tierney of having an agenda against Liverpool in win over Spurs
  • The German was booked for his over-zealous celebration in front of John Brooks
  • Martin Cassidy believes Liverpool should now be given a points deduction
By JONATHAN ROSE FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 10:15, 2 May 2023 | UPDATED: 11:27, 2 May 2023

91
View comments

The CEO of Ref Support UK has demanded that Liverpool are punished by the Premier League with a points deduction.
Jurgen Klopp is set to be charged by the FA after he accused Paul Tierney of having an agenda against the Reds following their dramatic 4-3 win over Tottenham.

[/article]

Referees Charity??! I bet that's well-supported!!
 
Masterstroke by Klopp imo. He has been getting all sorts of stick from the press. Now he has revealed what he heard, while the PGMOL didn't. Now everyone can judge whether Tierney is biased or not.

Yeah, I thought the same.
 
Masterstroke by Klopp imo. He has been getting all sorts of stick from the press. Now he has revealed what he heard, while the PGMOL didn't. Now everyone can judge whether Tierney is biased or not.
What I missing? He thought it was a red (so do I) and he changed it to a yellow because his 4th official asked him to? Just shows rules are open to interpretation and a human element.

Jota not getting sent off makes it impossible for me to see a bias. Shit ref yes. Bias no.
 
So in a nutshell

Klopp said "Tierney said something to me that's not OK"

That thing was "For me, it was a red card"

However, he listened to Brooks and gave a Yellow..

The media tried to put words into Klopps mouth. Emotive language like was it improper?

I dunno where I stand on this. If he's charged with bringing the game into disrepute, we can't really argue.

The only master stroke here is Klopp has potentially mitigated his way back from a 3+ game ban to a 1+ game ban by clarifying his remarks today.
 
I don't think Tierney is biased against Liverpool.

A brief survey of many forums show that almost every fan base thinks Tierney is biased against them.

The question for the people in charge of referees is, why? Why does everyone think Tierney hates them? Maybe he's just a shit, vindictive referee?
 
What I missing? He thought it was a red (so do I) and he changed it to a yellow because his 4th official asked him to? Just shows rules are open to interpretation and a human element.

Jota not getting sent off makes it impossible for me to see a bias. Shit ref yes. Bias no.
It's up to your interpretation. It could also mean "I dislike you", for me it should be a red, but the 4th official said yellow so be it. That shows a bias-ness to Klopp.
 
We're having the wrong discussion at this point. He's clearly getting a ban and we're relying on Pep to bring the intensity and United to drop points.

Europa League, it is.
 
Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp has been charged by the Football Association for his comments about referee Paul Tierney after his side's 4-3 win against Tottenham on Sunday.
The German, who said he regretted the headlines created by his comments, said Tierney appears to have something "against" his team.

The FA alleged Klopp's comments constitute "improper conduct".
Klopp has until Friday, 5 May to respond to the charge.
"It is alleged that the manager's comments regarding the match official during post-match media interviews constitutes improper conduct in that they imply bias, and/or question the integrity of the referee, and/or are personal/offensive, and/or bring the game into disrepute," the FA said.
 
Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp has been charged by the Football Association for his comments about referee Paul Tierney after his side's 4-3 win against Tottenham on Sunday.
The German, who said he regretted the headlines created by his comments, said Tierney appears to have something "against" his team.

The FA alleged Klopp's comments constitute "improper conduct".
Klopp has until Friday, 5 May to respond to the charge.
"It is alleged that the manager's comments regarding the match official during post-match media interviews constitutes improper conduct in that they imply bias, and/or question the integrity of the referee, and/or are personal/offensive, and/or bring the game into disrepute," the FA said.
Tolds ya. FA will want to throw the book at him.

If you are looking for precedent, Ferguson was banned for 5 games for something similar.
 
It's up to your interpretation. It could also mean "I dislike you", for me it should be a red, but the 4th official said yellow so be it. That shows a bias-ness to Klopp.
The issue with that is, the ref has final say. He could very easily have just given a red and said he believed it was a red and very few would argue against it.
He didn’t though so I’m on the fence with that interpretation.
 
It can be heard a number of ways.

For example, if cop caught you speeding, and when he said "I was going to shoot you for assault, but my partner told me not to" would that be ok?

Anyway, I hope Klopp just takes it on the chin, makes no further comment and forgets about it. It's an unnecessary distraction when we have three must win games (and a cheeky draw with Leicester) to attend to.
 
It can be heard a number of ways.

For example, if cop caught you speeding, and when he said "I was going to shoot you for assault, but my partner told me not to" would that be ok?

Anyway, I hope Klopp just takes it on the chin, makes no further comment and forgets about it. It's an unnecessary distraction when we have three must win games (and a cheeky draw with Leicester) to attend to.
Not really comparable at all. If he said I was going to give you the maximum allowable fine but my partner said to let you off with a warning that would be fair and it’s exactly the issue here.

Sending Klopp off would have been absolutely fair. He didn’t.
 
Not really comparable at all. If he said I was going to give you the maximum allowable fine but my partner said to let you off with a warning that would be fair and it’s exactly the issue here.

Sending Klopp off would have been absolutely fair. He didn’t.

What would he have been sending klopp off for?
 
What would he have been sending klopp off for?
Aggressively running at the 4th official and celebrating in his face. Inciting aggression against officials. Imagine Jota ran to the ref and celebrated that way. Klopp ticked all of the below. Officials are off limits, period.
  • using offensive, insulting or abusive language and/or action(s)
 
Not really comparable at all. If he said I was going to give you the maximum allowable fine but my partner said to let you off with a warning that would be fair and it’s exactly the issue here.

Sending Klopp off would have been absolutely fair. He didn’t.

Yeah, but you're forgetting that you and said cop have a history. He has pulled you over multiple times for no reason and not been fair in his treatment of you earlier.
 
The issue with that is, the ref has final say. He could very easily have just given a red and said he believed it was a red and very few would argue against it.
He didn’t though so I’m on the fence with that interpretation.
If he had just given the yellow or red, and said nothing, that will be that, no issues either way. But he has to say what he did, which showed a level of emotion. He should be refereeing based on facts and rules, not emotions. It's unnecessary, made worse by the fact that they had a history. It's up for interpretation yes, but it should never be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom