Arf.
No, Del, I would not. For one thing I really don't think the "premeditated" point stands at all - tackles like the most recent ones I've referred to are at least as premeditated as Suarez' actions at the weekend. For another - and this is the crucial point as far as I'm concerned - what Suarez did was nowhere near as dangerous. It's more unusual, but so what? AFAIC the more dangerous act is the one which deserves the greater disapproval, period. Otherwise you're treating the less dangerous act as the more heinous one merely because it's seen less often and that, to me, is indefensibly shallow.
Typical bluenose response. I just got forwarded this so dunno if it's real.
If it is I expect him to be in some shit.
Typical bluenose response. I just got forwarded this so dunno if it's real.
If it is I expect him to be in some shit.
You started off by saying you weren't comparing incidents. Now that's all you're doing.
What's more, I can't tell whether you're missing the point or just deliberately ignoring it. The "danger" parameters you've introduced seem like a convenient way of explaining away appalling behaviour to me. Perhaps we can look forward to footballers biting, spitting, and defecating on opponents, safe in the knowledge that they're not endangering them in any way. Presumably none are as bad as a potentially harmful mistimed tackle.
Anyway, I'm finding all of these attempts to brush biting under the carpet a bit embarrassing, so you'll forgive me if I bow out now. Clearly I'm in the minority with regards to biting. I do hope we show the same support to Flanagan should he ever become embroiled in a biting scandal.
Typical bluenose response. I just got forwarded this so dunno if it's real.
If it is I expect him to be in some shit.
Ah. Cool. It did seem unlikely he'd call someone a sewer rat like!
You started off by saying you weren't comparing incidents. Now that's all you're doing.
What's more, I can't tell whether you're missing the point or just deliberately ignoring it. The "danger" parameters you've introduced seem like a convenient way of explaining away appalling behaviour to me. Perhaps we can look forward to footballers biting, spitting, and defecating on opponents, safe in the knowledge that they're not endangering them in any way. Presumably none are as bad as a potentially harmful mistimed tackle.
Anyway, I'm finding all of these attempts to brush biting under the carpet a bit embarrassing, so you'll forgive me if I bow out now. Clearly I'm in the minority with regards to biting. I do hope we show the same support to Flanagan should he ever become embroiled in a biting scandal.
I'm not winding anyone up, instead of moaning about the FA and how bad they are people should be considering why he keeps ending up in front of them
Without getting in an argument with you, how exactly do you feel you are in a minority as regards to biting? Has somebody condoned it?. Certainly some ( not me) have made comparisons to other types of offences but I would say there has been a very high %age condemnation on here of the incident
Obviously its worse than an accidental challenge, but I think the point folks are making is - is it worse than a premeditated tackle carried out with a specific aim to impart injury on the other player?I mean that I clearly think it's worse than many people seem to on here, and much harder to justify than a mistimed tackle. Although I certainly wouldn't describe the general reaction on here as one of "condemnation" myself. Many are trying very hard to trivialise it.
I mean that I clearly think it's worse than many people seem to on here, and much harder to justify than a mistimed tackle. Although I certainly wouldn't describe the general reaction on here as one of "condemnation" myself. Many are trying very hard to trivialise it.
I mean that I clearly think it's worse than many people seem to on here, and much harder to justify than a mistimed tackle. Although I certainly wouldn't describe the general reaction on here as one of "condemnation" myself. Many are trying very hard to trivialise it.
You started off by saying you weren't comparing incidents. Now that's all you're doing.
What's more, I can't tell whether you're missing the point or just deliberately ignoring it. The "danger" parameters you've introduced seem like a convenient way of explaining away appalling behaviour to me. Perhaps we can look forward to footballers biting, spitting, and defecating on opponents, safe in the knowledge that they're not endangering them in any way. Presumably none are as bad as a potentially harmful mistimed tackle.
Anyway, I'm finding all of these attempts to brush biting under the carpet a bit embarrassing, so you'll forgive me if I bow out now. Clearly I'm in the minority with regards to biting. I do hope we show the same support to Flanagan should he ever become embroiled in a biting scandal.
I mean that I clearly think it's worse than many people seem to on here, and much harder to justify than a mistimed tackle. Although I certainly wouldn't describe the general reaction on here as one of "condemnation" myself. Many are trying very hard to trivialise it.
Typical bluenose response. I just got forwarded this so dunno if it's real.
If it is I expect him to be in some shit.
I have found the winner, I'm lost for words.
That daily mail article is unbelievable.
'his cannibalisation' really. He ate someone? Riiighhhtt.
Fuck me that article is complete shite.