• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Italy vs England

Status
Not open for further replies.
The opinion regarding wether he played well or not is irrelevant.
You cant judge a player on 12 minutes on a pitch against a team known for their ability to shut up shop. Its something a woman or a non football fan would do.
Youre usually better than this with your battles, this is just utterly retarded.
'Lallana was wank' based on ten minutes against Italy is daft mate.

Ok granted I'm childish and a cunt for thinking that, but is it right for people who said the same about Aspas to look down on me?
That's the issue here.
 
The daily mail with their usual perfect journalism standards here:

4ejy4a7a.jpg


That would be 17.5 pints each. More than unlikely.

The level of numeracy of our journalists is shocking.

Read this one and weep.https://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news...rcelona-forward-alexis-sanchez-061505738.html
 
Ok granted I'm childish and a cunt for thinking that, but is it right for people who said the same about Aspas to look down on me?
That's the issue here.
I dont see what one has to do with the other.
Honestly I dont Modo.
People were coming down on Aspas because he fucked up twice in a game where he was actually given a final opportunity after being borderline dire all season.
The Lallana situation yesterday is not in any way comparable.

A basic comparison would be eg: Lambert comes on for his debut for 10 minutes against Chelsea leading 2-1 and doesnt score a goal or win the game and people saying he was wank.

Its just all a bit silly. And you are USUALLY smarter than giving people legitimate reasons to think youre being daft.

You are bringing in Wellbeck and Aspas to your argument to deflect from it being a pretty shitty and uneducated opinion.
Best to let it go my man.
 
Ok granted I'm childish and a cunt for thinking that, but is it right for people who said the same about Aspas to look down on me?
That's the issue here.

It's a retarded comparison, because Aspas' performance was symptomatic of his performances so far for us, albeit fleetingly. It's easier to say that Aspas performance in that game summed up his contribution to us entirely. You can't take a 10 minute England appearance and brandish it as wank, because it suits your agenda, it's a pointless comment, particularly when it's barely an indicator of how he performed for his club over the season. How did he do in his first friendly appearance? He was like a breath of fresh air, why is he being so highly rated? Because he's had a very good season.

You started off weeks ago saying he was overpriced (so did I), now the fee has become a side story to what is essentially an agenda to not just prove him to be over-priced, but to be a poor player, which is a load of fucking shit.

We shouldn't be surprised though, it's what you do, before pulling all this woe-is-me crap, while some poster who hasn't bothered reading the background to it all, inevitably starts jumping to your defense as a poor little victimised poster who "only has an opinion". Good job most people see through the bullshit and recognise you for being a self obsessed, attention seeking child. Just a shame that this shit has to play out every fucking week, ruining thread after thread, well done you.
 
It seems that a lot of folks are getting peeved with Modo, if that is the case why not just put him on 'ignore', that way he won't annoy you and the threads can continue. I've put someone on ignore and it has made my time on here a lot more enjoyable.
 
It seems that a lot of folks are getting peeved with Modo, if that is the case why not just put him on 'ignore', that way he won't annoy you and the threads can continue. I've put someone on ignore and it has made my time on here a lot more enjoyable.

It's a fair question. The answer (AFAIC anyway) is that, if you do that to someone who posts a lot, threads can seem bitty and disjointed. I haven't done it for a long time despite occasional temptations to do so, and that's why.
 
It's a fair question. The answer (AFAIC anyway) is that, if you do that to someone who posts a lot, threads can seem bitty and disjointed. I haven't done it for a long time despite occasional temptations to do so, and that's why.

fair point, i imagine Posts will be harder to follow. I suppose its a cost/benefit analysis, if it is getting too upsetting levels then maybe its worth it,
 
Unbearable, autistic, sad and Aspbergers.

Still waiting for someone to tell me why it was OK to call Aspas wank after his cameo and not Lallana.


BECAUSE ASPAS WAS FUCKING WANK WHEN HE CAME ON AND LALLANA WASN'T YOU INTOLERABLE FUCKER.
 
Anyway, let's talk more about Pirlo.

My word. My fucking word what a player.

90 minutes of that bearded Italian having sex with a football. 117 touches and everyone of them was like the feeling of your cock touching the vag lips just as you're about to slide the fucker in. Mesmerising.

I nearly blew my load all over the living room when he sashayed that free-kick off the bar in the dying minutes. In a way it was better it didn't go in, kinda made it even more iconic that it just pinged off the bar and he waltzed off non-plussed like a fucking boss.

See the way he hit the fucking thing too? Just nonchalantly flicked at it and then had the audacity to arc his leg around after it like the coolest cat in town. Here's me doing that shit any day of the week world, watch my sex. Someone get a gif of it for fuck's sake so I can get another lob on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom